投资者多元化救济体系问题探析——以《证券法》第九十三条先行赔付制度为视角
A Probe into the Problem of the Diversified Relief System for Investors—From the Perspective of the Advance Compensation System in Article 93 of the Securities Law
摘要: 强化投资者保护可谓新《证券法》的重要修订内容。为了拓宽投资者民事救济渠道以保护中小投资者权益,曾在实践中操作的先行赔付通过《证券法》第九十三条在法律层面上得以明确。然而,推动先行赔付发挥积极功能,需要构建激励机制。借鉴于证券市场实践,先行赔付与行政和解的制度衔接以及先行赔付主体向其他责任主体追偿预期性的提高有利于激励责任主体进行先行赔付。对于受损投资者,参与赔付方案拟定程序以及通过投资者保护机构保障赔付则是提高其接受先行赔付协议意愿的关键。
Abstract:
The strengthening of investor protection is one of the important revisions in the new Securities Law. To broaden the civil remedy channel for investors and protect the rights and interests of investors, Advance Compensation System is clarified from the legal level through Article 93 of the Securities Law of the People’s Republic of China. However, in order to promote the Advance Compensation System to play a positive role, it is necessary to set up an incentive mecha-nism. Referring to the practice of the securities market, the connection between the advance com-pensation and the administrative settlement system, and the increase of the anticipatory recovery by the advance compensation body will help to encourage the responsibility body to conduct the advance payment. For injured investors, participation in the compensation planning process and the protection of compensation through an investor protection agency are key to increasing their willingness to accept the upfront settlement.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
肖宇, 黄辉. 证券市场先行赔付: 法理辨析与制度构建[J]. 法学, 2019(8): 160-172.
|
|
[2]
|
段丙华. 先行赔付证券投资者的法律逻辑及其制度实现[J]. 证券市场导报, 2017(8): 4-12+18.
|
|
[3]
|
岳冰. 证券欺诈民事救济的困境与出路[J]. 河南财经政法大学学报, 2016, 31(1): 102-111.
|
|
[4]
|
黄辉. 中国证券虚假陈述民事赔偿制度: 实证分析与政策建议[J]. 证券法苑, 2013, 9(2): 967-995.
|
|
[5]
|
杨城. 论我国虚假陈述民事责任主体的困境与创新[J]. 证券市场导报, 2017(7): 70-78.
|
|
[6]
|
姚一凡. 保荐人先行赔付制度的解读与反思[J]. 金融法苑, 2018(1): 62-72.
|
|
[7]
|
沈朝晖. 监管的市场分权理论与演化中的行政治理从中国证监会与保荐人的法律关系切入[J]. 中外法学, 2011, 23(4): 849-869.
|
|
[8]
|
田春雷, 朱珊珊. 论证券市场先行赔付法律制度的完善[J]. 证券法律评论, 2018(0): 368-376.
|
|
[9]
|
汤欣. 证券投资者保护新规中的先行赔付[J]. 中国金融, 2020(8): 38-40.
|