“用户创造内容(UGC)”的著作权规制
Regulation of Copyright of User Created Content (UGC)
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2022.119496, PDF,   
作者: 刘 帆:天津大学法学院,天津
关键词: 用户创造内容授权许可合理使用User-Created Content Copyright License Fair Use
摘要: 依托互联网的迅速发展,作品创作方式多样化,“用户创造内容”合法性问题为版权理论与实务界带来困扰。现阶段,授权许可调整“用户创造内容”失灵的原因不在于授权许可制度自身局限性,而在于未明确“用户创造内容”可以归入“合理使用”的范围,网络用户无法判断自身使用作品行为的性质。目前,进一步优化合理使用制度才是《著作权法》规制“用户创造内容”的应选路径。通过梳理“用户创造内容”的实践现状与自身特点,分析“用户创造内容”归入合理适用的可行性与范围。同时,提出修改《信息网络传播权保护条例》第六条,增设作品网络传播合理使用新情形的立法建议,为“用户创造内容”归入合理使用提供制度支持。
Abstract: Relying on the rapid development of the Internet, the creation methods of works are diversified, and the legality of “user-created content” has brought troubles to the copyright theory and prac-tice. At this stage, the reason for the failure of licensing adjustment of “user-created content” is not due to the limitations of the licensing system itself, but because it is not clear that “user-created content” can be classified as “reasonable use”, so that network users cannot judge their own use of nature of the behavior. At present, further optimizing the fair use system is the path that the Copyright Law should choose to regulate “user-created content”. By sorting out the practical status and characteristics of “user-created content”, it analyzes the feasibility and scope of “user-created content” being reasonably applicable. At the same time, it proposes to amend Article 6 of the “Regulations on the Protection of the Right to Disseminate Information Networks” to add new legislative proposals for the rational use of online dissemination of works, so as to provide institutional support for “user-created content” to be classified as fair use.
文章引用:刘帆. “用户创造内容(UGC)”的著作权规制[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2022, 11(9): 3621-3626. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2022.119496

参考文献

[1] 熊琦. “用户创造内容”与作品转换性使用认定[J]. 法学评论, 2017, 35(3): 64-74.
[2] 胡开忠. 论重混创作行为的法律规制[J]. 法学, 2014(12): 89-97.
[3] 华劼. 改编权权利范围及立法模式研究[J]. 南京大学学报(哲学•人文科学•社会科学), 2017, 54(6): 47-53+155.
[4] Gervais, D. (2009) The Tangled Web of “UGC”: Making Copyright Sense of Us-er-Generated Content. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 11, 841.
[5] Patterson, L.R. (1966) The Statute of Anne: Copyright Misconstrued. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 3, 223.
[6] 林楠. 三步检验法的司法适用新思路——经济分析主导下合理使用的引入[J]. 西南政法大学学报, 2016, 18(6): 37-47.
[7] 吴汉东. 著作权合理使用制度研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2013.
[8] Goold, P.R. (2014) Why the U.K. Adaptation Right Is Superior to the U.S. Derivative Work Right. Nebraska Law Review, 92, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Babiskin, L.M. (1994) Oh Pretty Parody: Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 8, 193-230.