小额诉讼中公正与效率的价值博弈
Value Game between Justice and Efficiency in Small Claims Litigation
摘要: 罗尔斯曾经说过:“一个社会无论效率多高、多大,如果它缺乏公正,则我们不会认为它比效率较差但公正的社会更理想。”作为与人们生活作为密切的民事诉讼法,兼顾公正与效率是重要原则之一,而在民事诉讼法中公正与效率的价值博弈也从未停止,作为最能反映诉讼经济性和效率的小额诉讼制度,通过探究其概念与具体实践,从而寻找到其内部所蕴含的公正与效率的关系,是法学生必不可少的必修课。
Abstract:
Rawls once said, “no matter how efficient or big a society is, if it lacks justice, we will not think it is more ideal than a less efficient but just society.” As a civil procedure law closely related to people’s lives, giving consideration to justice and efficiency is one of the important principles, and the value game between justice and efficiency in the civil procedure law has never stopped. As a small claims system that can best reflect the economy and efficiency of litigation, it is an indispensable com-pulsory course for law students to explore its internal relationship between justice and efficiency by exploring its concept and specific practice.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
赵术萍. 对我国小额诉讼制度的反思与构建[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2014.
|
|
[2]
|
顾永伟. 小额诉讼程序适用范围研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021.
|
|
[3]
|
陈娟. 小额诉讼程序制度反思与完善[J]. 人民论坛(中旬刊), 2016(1): 133-135.
|
|
[4]
|
刘春一, 张羽晓. 论小额诉讼程序的再完善[J]. 湖北经济学院学报, 2016(9): 102-103.
|
|
[5]
|
范愉. 小额诉讼程序研究[J]. 中国社会科学, 2001(3): 141-153+207.
|
|
[6]
|
陈瑞华. 刑事审判原理论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1997: 95.
|
|
[7]
|
沈德咏. 最高人民法院民事诉讼法司法解释理解与适用[M]. 北京: 人民法院出版社, 2015.
|
|
[8]
|
苏婷婷. 论小额诉讼程序之一审终审制[J]. 大东方, 2016(4): 263-265.
|