HRCLDAS气温数据在寒潮个例中的适用性评估
Applicability Assessment of HRCLDAS Air Temperature Data in Cold Wave Case
DOI: 10.12677/CCRL.2022.115074, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 孔祥宁*, 刘焕彬#, 曹 洁:山东省气象防灾减灾重点实验室,山东 济南;山东省气候中心,山东 济南;郑 娜:邹平市气象局,山东 滨州
关键词: HRCLDAS山东省寒潮适用性评估HRCLDAS Shandong Province Cold Wave Applicability Assessment
摘要: 本文选取2021年11月7~9日对山东造成较大影响的寒潮过程个例,对比HRCLDAS与观测数据在过程最低温、过程最大24小时降温幅度以及寒潮影响范围等方面的异同,评估HRCLDAS对寒潮过程的监测能力。评估结果表明:HRCLDAS气温数据对2021年11月7~9日寒潮过程的判别时间准确,与实测完全一致;使用HRCLDAS数据计算的过程最低气温、过程最大降温幅度与实测分布大致相同,且由于HRCLDAS引入了高分辨率地形数据,其对过程最低气温以及过程最大降温幅度的刻画更加细致;HRCLDAS与实测逐日寒潮影响范围变化相同,逐日寒潮影响范围均先增加,后减少,但HRCLDAS每日超强寒潮范围占比较观测偏多,其中,11月9日,观测与HRCLDAS的超强寒潮占比差异较大。
Abstract: The cold wave process from November 7 to 9, 2021 which has a great impact on Shandong was selected in this study. The difference of lowest temperature, the largest 24-hour temperature drop, and the scope of this cold wave process between HRCLDAS and observed data were analyzed to as-sess the ability of HRCLDAS in monitoring cold wave process. The evaluation results show that: the HRCLDAS temperature data is accurate for the identification time of the cold wave process, which is completely consistent with the actual measurement; the process minimum temperature and the process maximum temperature drop calculated using the HRCLDAS data are roughly the same as the measured distribution. HRCLDAS can describe the minimum temperature in more detail for taking topography into account. The daily cold wave influence range of HRCLDAS and observed was similar, with increasing first and then decreasing. The super cold wave proportion of HRCLDAS was more than observations, especially on November 9, the proportion of super cold wave between observed and HRCLDAS was quite different.
文章引用:孔祥宁, 刘焕彬, 曹洁, 郑娜. HRCLDAS气温数据在寒潮个例中的适用性评估[J]. 气候变化研究快报, 2022, 11(5): 703-708. https://doi.org/10.12677/CCRL.2022.115074

参考文献

[1] 黄炜楠, 李雪, 董胜. 基于小波分析的山东寒潮强弱变化特征研究[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2017, 26(3): 56-62.
[2] 韩帅, 师春香, 姜志伟, 等. CMA高分辨率陆面数据同化系统(HRCLDAS-V1.0)研发及进展[J]. 气象科技进展, 2018, 8(1): 102-108, 116.
[3] Wang, Q., Li, W., Xiao, C., et al. (2020) Evaluation of High-Resolution Crop Model Meteorological Forcing Datasets at Regional Scale: Air Temperature and Precipitation over Major Land Areas of China. Atmosphere, 11, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 师春香, 潘旸, 谷军霞, 等. 多源气象数据融合格点实况产品研制进展[J]. 气象学报, 2019, 77(4): 774-783.
[5] 董春卿, 郭媛媛, 张磊, 等. 基于CLDAS的格点温度预报偏差订正方法[J]. 干旱气象, 2021, 39(5): 847-856.
[6] Jiang, Y., Han, S., Shi, C., et al. (2021) Evaluation of HRCLDAS and ERA5 Datasets for Near-Surface Wind over Hainan Island and South China Sea. Atmosphere, 12, 766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 魏荣庆, 宗志平, 唐冶. GB/T 21987-2017寒潮等级[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.