公共政策在国际商事仲裁司法审查中的运用

Application of Public Policy in Judicial Review of International Commercial Arbitration

摘要: 本文以《纽约公约》第五条第二款(乙)项为起点，结合国际实践与理论中的发展趋势，分析公共政策在国际商事仲裁司法审查中的运用。其中在发展过程中呼声最高的两种观点，一是质疑“公共政策”在实践层面的现实意义；二是主张以“国际公共政策”替代“区域性公共政策”。在本文中，笔者将逐一驳斥这两种观点，并且主张地域性公共政策应当长期存续，并且其与国际公共政策的差异性具有正当性，不应当一味、盲目地主张两者趋同。

Abstract: Starting with Article V(2)(b) of the New York Convention, this article analyzes the application of public policy in judicial review of international commercial arbitration in light of the developing trends in international practice and theory. The two most vocal views in the process of development are those that question the practical significance of “public policy” in practice and those that advocate replacing “regional public policy” with “international public policy”. The second is that “international public policy” should replace “regional public policy”. In this article, author will refute each of these two views and argue that regional public policy should survive in the long term and that its differences with international public policy are justified, and that there should not be a blind convergence between the two.