论法律不能与禁止性规定的适用关系
On the Application of Legal Impossibility of Performance and Prohibitive Regulations
摘要: 现行法和学说未关注法律不能与禁止性规定的适用关系。若通过法律不能制度即可实现禁止性规定的规范目的，则无无效之必要。通过比较禁止性规定和法律不能的适用范围，归纳二者适用范围的交集。区分事实上是否履行，适用违法无效的规制进路和法律不能制度的法律效果不尽相同。优先适用法律不能制度较之违法无效进路能有效维护私法自治、防范违法行为、符合法律规定。
Abstract:
Current laws and doctrines do not pay attention to the application of legal impossibility of perfor-mance and prohibitive regulations. If the normative purpose of the prohibitive regulations can be achieved through the legal impossibility, there is no need to be invalid. By comparing the scope of application of prohibitive regulations and legal impossibility, the intersection of the scope of appli-cation of the two is summarized. To distinguish whether it has actually been performed, the legal effects of applying the prohibitive regulations and legal impossibility are not similar. Compared with the legal impossibility approach, applying the prohibitive regulations can effectively maintain the autonomy of private law, prevent illegal acts, and comply with legal regulations, so it is more le-gitimate.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
Dirk Looschelders, Schulrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 18. Aufl., München Vahlen 2020, § 21.
|
|
[2]
|
MüKoBGB/Armbrüster, 8. Aufl. 2018, BGB § 134 Rn. 20；
|
|
[3]
|
王泽鉴. 民法总则[M]. 台北: 三民书局, 2021: 333.
|
|
[4]
|
朱广新. 合同法总则研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2018: 683.
|
|
[5]
|
李宇. 民法总则要义[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2017: 641-642.
|
|
[6]
|
BeckOK BGB/Wendtland, 58. Ed. 1.5.2021, BGB § 134 Rn. 2.
|
|
[7]
|
王泽鉴. 民法总则[M]. 台北: 三民书局, 2021: 311.
|
|
[8]
|
庄加园. 债权人原因引起的给付不能[J]. 法律科学, 2018, 36(5): 143-154.
|
|
[9]
|
Staudinger/ Lorenz, 2007, §817 Rn.1ff. BGB.
|
|
[10]
|
吴至诚. 违法无效合同不当得利返还的比例分担——以股权代持为中心[J]. 中外法学, 2021, 33(3): 606-625.
|
|
[11]
|
郑晓剑. 比例原则在民法上的适用及展开[J]. 中国法学, 2016(2): 143-165.
|
|
[12]
|
胡坚明. 德国法上违反禁止性规定之法律行为的效力[J]. 华东政法大学学报, 2018, 21(2): 133-145.
|
|
[13]
|
陈兴良. 违法性认识研究[J]. 中国法学, 2005(4): 131-141.
|
|
[14]
|
车浩. 法定犯时代的违法性认识错误[J]. 清华法学, 2015(4): 22-46.
|
|
[15]
|
李宇. 民法总则要义[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2017: 636.
|