网络版权中技术措施的法律保护研究——基于USMCA、CPTPP和RCEP的比较分析
Legal Protection of Technical Measures in Network Copyright—Comparative Analysis Based on USMCA\CPTPP and RCEP
摘要: USMCA、RCEP、CPTPP是当下全球三大最具代表性的区域贸易协定,这三大协定均在知识产权篇中规定了对技术措施进行保护的义务。我国已加入RCEP,并在2020年《著作权法》第三次修正时,对技术措施保护进行了专项规定。但是,与CPTPP和USMCA的标准相比较,我国有关技术措施的法律保护还是不够完善。因此,本文立足于我国积极加入CPTPP的大背景,采取对比分析的方法,通过比较USMCA、RCEP、CPTPP有关技术措施的规定,试图总结三大协定确立的技术措施保护标准对我国的影响,在此基础上为完善我国技术措施法律制度提出相关建议。
Abstract: USMCA, RCEP and CPTPP are the three most representative regional trade agreements in the world, all of which stipulate the obligation to protect technical measures in the intellectual property. Our country has joined the RCEP, and in 2020, “Copyright Law” the Third Amendment, the protection of technical measures for a special provision. However, compared with the standards of CPTPP and USMCA, the legal protection of technical measures in our country is not perfect. Therefore, based on the background of our country’s active participation in CPTPP, this paper adopts the method of comparative analysis and compares the relevant technical measures of USMCA, RCEP and CPTPP, this paper tries to sum up the influence of the technical measures protection standards established in the three agreements on our country, and on this basis, puts forward some suggestions for perfecting our legal system of technical measures.
文章引用:张文瑶. 网络版权中技术措施的法律保护研究——基于USMCA、CPTPP和RCEP的比较分析[J]. 法学, 2022, 10(5): 900-905. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJLS.2022.105117

参考文献

[1] 李娟娟. TRIPS时代网络版权保护技术措施研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 上海: 复旦大学, 2012.
[2] 张乃根. 与时俱进的RCEP知识产权条款及其比较[J]. 武大国际法评论, 2021(2): 1-25.
[3] 文碧青. 论著作权中技术保护措施的规制[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2017.
[4] 郭鹏. 网络版权立法: 全球趋同化中的利益差异——以技术措施法律保护机制为视角[J]. 学术研究, 2011(5): 54-58.
[5] 马忠法, 谢迪扬. RCEP知识产权条款的定位、特点及中国应对[J]. 学海, 2021(4): 181-191.