出淤泥而不染：自尊的心理动力作用
Getting out of the Mud without Being Stained: The Psycho-Dynamic Role of Zi Zun
摘要: “出淤泥而不染”是儒家理想人格的重要外在表现，是道德教育的目标之一。由于对人格尊严神圣性的强调，自尊作为儒家理想人格能抵御利益得失对个体道德认知的负面影响，从而削弱他人作弊对个体作弊态度的影响，使得个体在不良学术环境中做到“出淤泥而不染”。研究对1681名在校大学生进行调查发现：1) 自尊对他人作弊与社会损失的关系无显著调节作用；2) 自尊负向调节社会损失与作弊态度的关系。研究结果支持了儒家的人性假设，支持了儒家自尊理论关于自尊能抵御利益得失对道德品质的侵蚀作用的基本论述，对“培养什么人”和“怎么培养人”有重要的启示。
Abstract: “Getting out of the mud without being stained” is an important external expression of Confucian ideal personality, and is one of the goals of moral education. Due to the emphasis on the sanctity of personal dignity, Zi Zun, as the Confucian ideal personality, can resist the negative influence of gain and loss of interests on individual moral cognition, thereby weakening the influence of others’ cheating on individual cheating attitude, so that individuals can “get out of the mud without being stained” in the bad academic environment. A sample of 1681 undergraduates was recruited for the study. They were required to complete a battery of questionnaires, including Others’ Cheating Questionnaire, Social Loss Questionnaire, Attitude toward Cheating Questionnaire, and Zi Zun Questionnaire for College Students. The research found that: 1) Zi Zun negatively moderated the relationship between social loss and attitude toward cheating; 2) Zi Zun not negatively moderated the relationship between others’ cheating and social loss. The results support the Confucian hypothesis of human nature, support the Confucian theory of Zi Zun that Zi Zun can resist the erosion of gain and loss of interests on moral character, and have important implications for “what kind of person to cultivate” and “how to cultivate the ideal person”.
文章引用：舒首立, 孙婷婷, 苏懿, 桑青松 (2022). 出淤泥而不染：自尊的心理动力作用. 心理学进展, 12(9), 3185-3191. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2022.129385

参考文献

[1] 高德胜(2012). 人的尊严与教育的尊严. 高等教育研究, (2), 1-12.
[2] 龙静云, 吴涛(2018). 论法治社会的道德规范建构. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 57(2), 65-73.
[3] 沈嘉祺(2002). 基础性道德情感的教育价值及其培养. 中国教育学刊, (2), 16-19.
[4] 舒首立, 郭永玉, 黄希庭(2015). 中国人的自尊结构初探. 心理学探新, 35(5), 425-431.
[5] 舒首立, 桑青松, 郭永玉, 黄希庭(2018). 作弊为什么会传染? 社会损失和作弊态度的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(6), 664-671.
[6] 舒首立, 杨沈龙, 白洁, 郭永玉(2017). 他人作弊与自己作弊: 社会损失的中介作用和自尊的调节作用. 心理学探新, 37(1), 48-53.
[7] 现代汉语词典(第6版) (2012). 商务印书馆.
[8] 肖群忠(2004). 论自爱. 道德与文明, (4), 17-22.
[9] 袁贵仁(1993). 试论人格. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (5), 43-52.
[10] 邹德谨, 蒋正陆, 秦同培(1919). 人格修养法. 商务印书馆.
[11] Baron, J., & Ritov, I. (2009). Protected Values and Omission Bias as Deontological Judgments. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 50, 133-167.[CrossRef] 
[12] Becker, T. E., Atinc, G., Breaugh, J. A., Carlson, K. D., Edwards, J. R., & Spector, P. E. (2016). Statistical Control in Correlational Studies: 10 Essential Recommendations for Organizational Researchers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 157-167.[CrossRef] 
[13] Bernerth, J. B., & Aguinis, H. (2016). A Critical Review and Best-Practice Recommendations for Control Variable Usage. Personnel Psychology, 69, 229-283.[CrossRef] 
[14] Brodie, S., Hunter, S., McNeilly, V., Takla, S., & Zirk, A. (2014). To Cheat or Not to Cheat: A Study Focused on Student and Professor Perspectives about Academic Dishonesty. MacEwan University Student eJournal, 1, 53-80.[CrossRef] 
[15] Callahan, D. (2006). On Campus: Author Discusses the “Cheating Culture” with College Students. Plagiary: Cross-Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism, Fabrication, and Falsification, 1, 1-8.
[16] Cooper, J., Blackman, S., & Keller, K. (2016). The Science of Attitudes. Routledge.[CrossRef] 
[17] Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.
[18] Tanner, C., Medin, D. L., & Iliev, R. (2008). Influence of Deontological versus Consequentialist Orientations on Act Choices and Framing Effects: When Principles Are More Important than Consequences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 757-769.[CrossRef] 
[19] Williams, P., Kern, M. L., & Waters, L. (2016). Inside-Out-Outside-In: A Dual Approach Process Model to Developing Work Happiness. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6, 30-56.[CrossRef] 
[20] Wray, B. A., Jones, A. T., Schuhmann, P. W., & Burrus, R. T. (2016). Determining the Propensity for Academic Dishonesty Using Decision Tree Analysis. Ethics & Behavior, 26, 470-487.[CrossRef]