人教版高中数学立体几何新、旧教材对比分析——以“空间点、直线、平面之间的位置关系”为例
A Comparative Analysis of the New and Old Textbooks on Mathematical Solid Geometry in the High School Version of the People’s Education Edition—Taking the “Positional Relationship between Spatial Points, Straight Lines, and Planes” as an Example
DOI: 10.12677/CES.2022.1010371, PDF,   
作者: 李 丹:伊犁师范大学数学与统计学院,新疆 伊宁
关键词: 线面位置关系教材分析教学研究Line-Surface Position Relationship Textbook Analysis Teaching Research
摘要: 立体几何是继平面几何后更深层次几何内容的学习,亦是学生在中学阶段学习的难点之一。本文通过分析新课标下高中立体几何部分的课标要求,对比人教版新版教材(2019年教育部审定)与旧版教材(2017年教育部审定)之间的异同。以点线面位置关系为中心,围绕点线面位置关系分析教材设置的意图与作用,从而进一步根据自己的理解与思考设计线面平行课题的引入与探究环节,在其对比思考中得到高中立体几何部分的教学实践认识。
Abstract: Solid geometry is the study of deeper geometric content after plane geometry, and it is also one of the difficulties for students to learn in middle school. By analyzing the curriculum standard requirements of the solid geometry part of high school under the new curriculum standard, this paper compares the similarities and differences between the new version and the old version of the teaching materials. Focusing on the positional relationship between points, lines and surfaces, the intention and In order to further design the introduction and exploration of the parallel topic of line and plane according to his own understanding and thinking, and obtain the teaching practice understanding of the solid geometry part of high school in his comparative thinking.
文章引用:李丹. 人教版高中数学立体几何新、旧教材对比分析——以“空间点、直线、平面之间的位置关系”为例[J]. 创新教育研究, 2022, 10(10): 2358-2363. https://doi.org/10.12677/CES.2022.1010371

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部. 普通高中数学课程标准(2017版2020修订版) [M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2020
[2] 赵艳芳. 《标准》与《大纲》下高中几何教材比较与分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 首都师范大学, 2009.
[3] 郭芳. APOS理论下立体几何线面位置关系的教学研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 河南大学, 2019.
[4] 王海伴. 基于高中数学核心素养主题教学设计的实践与思考——以“直线、平面位置关系的判定与性质”为例[J].课程教育研究, 2019(25): 142-143.
[5] 宋书君. 普通高中数学新课程标准中“几何与代数”主题解读[J]. 考试周刊, 2020(77): 70-71.
[6] 陈小娟. 点线面位置关系学习的主导思想方法研究——以《空间点、直线、平面之间的位置关系》一节为例[J].数理化解题研究, 2019(4): 27-28.