飞行学员训练筛选考试科目研究
Research on the Subjects of the Screening Test for Pilot Training
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2022.1110735, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 任 丹*, 孙 宏, 胡慧昀, 刘 欣:中国民用航空飞行学院,四川 广汉
关键词: 飞行训练筛选考试课程教学评价方法核心胜任力Flight Training Screening Test Course Teaching Evaluation Method Core Competency
摘要: 13小时筛选考试是评估学员是否具备继续飞行培养潜质的关键环节,科学准确地评价该考试至关重要。本文首先介绍飞行筛选考试评分模型,利用平均值、相关性、难度、区分度、信度等统计指标对筛选考试质量进行统计分析,并就考试中反映的学员核心胜任力水平进行统计。结果显示:试题信度尚可,难度、区分度均设置合理。正常和侧风进近、着陆目测、着陆条件、低空操纵、正常和侧风着陆、假设迫降此类科目学员考试成绩整体偏低,且实际掌握水平较低,是影响筛选考试结果的关键难点科目。胜任力要素分析表明,技能要素是在后续训练中需注重加强的。据资深教员说明,文章研究结果具有较强的现实意义。
Abstract: The 13-hour screening test is the key link to evaluate whether the students have the potential of continuing flight training. It is very important to evaluate the screening test scientifically and accu-rately. Firstly, this paper introduces the scoring model of flight screening test, makes statistical analysis on the quality of screening test by using statistical indicators such as average value, corre-lation, difficulty, discrimination reliability, etc., and makes statistics on the core competency level of students reflected in the test. The results show that the reliability of the test questions is acceptable, and the difficulty and discrimination are set reasonably. Normal and crosswind approach, landing visual inspection, landing conditions, low altitude control, normal and crosswind landing, and hy-pothetical forced landing are the key and difficult subjects that affect the screening of test results, because the students’ test scores are generally low and their actual mastery level is low. The analy-sis of competency elements shows that skill elements need to be strengthened in follow-up training. According to senior teachers, the research results of this paper have strong practical significance.
文章引用:任丹, 孙宏, 胡慧昀, 刘欣. 飞行学员训练筛选考试科目研究[J]. 应用数学进展, 2022, 11(10): 6934-6941. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2022.1110735

参考文献

[1] 向导. 中国民航飞行员培训现状与展望[J]. 科学咨询(教育科研), 2020(2): 18-19.
[2] 夏吉祥, 翟海亭. 舰载战斗机飞行员专项力量素质训练研究[J]. 体育科技文献通报, 2021, 29(4): 151-153.
[3] 武国城. 军事飞行员心理选拔研究进展[J]. 航空军医, 2002, 30(3): 129-132.
[4] 李秀易, 伍伟. 全过程管理视角下民航飞行学员核心胜任能力评价体系研究[J]. 民航学报, 2021, 5(2): 94-97+88.
[5] 姚裕盛, 徐开俊. 基于BP神经网络的飞行训练品质评估[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(S1): 23-31.
[6] 罗凤娥, 李娜. 民航飞行员情景意识影响因素研究[J]. 科技和产业, 2021, 21(3): 311-315.
[7] 陈熙, 吴成秋, 贺栋梁. 试卷分析与评价的指标体系及其应用[J]. 西北医学教育, 2006, 14(5): 542+589.
[8] 韦美成. Excel 2016在试卷质量分析中的应用[J]. 办公自动化, 2021, 26(4): 63-64+37.
[9] 魏蕾, 董传仁, 李瑾, 王保华, 杨海鹭, 涂淑珍, 欧阳静萍. 病理生理学期末考试试卷分析与评价[J]. 中国病理生理杂志, 2000, 16(7): 670-671.
[10] 黄光扬, 等, 编. 教育测量与评价[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2012.
[11] 赵柳林. 警察院校体育训练模式的创新研究[J]. 人民论坛, 2015(33): 161-162
[12] 民航局出台《关于全面深化运输航空公司飞行训练改革的指导意见》[J]. 民航管理, 2019(7): 74.