基于Geofluv模型的土壤改良和植物措施对粤北某废弃离子型稀土矿山联合修复研究
A Joint Restoration Study on Soil Improvement and Plant Measures Based on the Geofluv Model on a Waste Ionic Rare Earth Mine in Northern Guangdong
DOI: 10.12677/ME.2022.104046, PDF,   
作者: 于 波, 李建和, 尤永春:广东省环境地质勘查院,广东 广州;明俊男, 莫国浩, 郝银龙, 李红图, 余少嘉, 陈宇航, 万 茂绿, 陈 森*:广东省地质建设工程集团公司,广东 广州;符加方, 张 慧:南雄市自然资源局,广东 南雄
关键词: 离子型稀土矿山近自然地貌重塑土壤重构植被重建生态修复Ionic Rare Earth Mine Near-Nature Landform Remodeling Soil Reconstruction Vegetation Reconstruction Ecological Restoration
摘要: 为探究离子型稀土矿山生态修复有效的治理方法和措施,本文通过对粤北某典型稀土矿山的生态调查与问题识别,提出采用近自然地貌重塑模型(Geofluv模型)的土壤重构与植被重建联合修复措施。通过对比治理前后水样和土壤的理化性状以及土壤动物和植被群落的变化组成,表明联合修复措施可以明显改善治理区的水土气生条件,在免养护条件下生态环境恢复效果明显。
Abstract: In order to explore the effective treatment methods and measures for ecological restoration of ionic rare earth mines, through the ecological investigation and problem identification of a typical rare earth mine in northern Guangdong, the soil reconstruction and vegetation reconstruction joint restoration measures of the near-nature landform remodeling model (Geofluv model) are proposed. By comparing the physicochemical characteristics of water samples and soils before and after treatment, as well as the variation composition of soil fauna and vegetation communities, it is shown that the joint remediation measures can significantly improve the water and soil gas conditions in the treatment area, and the ecological environment restoration effect is obvious under the condition of no maintenance.
文章引用:于波, 明俊男, 莫国浩, 李建和, 尤永春, 符加方, 郝银龙, 李红图, 张慧, 余少嘉, 陈宇航, 万茂绿, 陈森. 基于Geofluv模型的土壤改良和植物措施对粤北某废弃离子型稀土矿山联合修复研究[J]. 矿山工程, 2022, 10(4): 412-420. https://doi.org/10.12677/ME.2022.104046

参考文献

[1] 王友生. 稀土开采对红壤生态系统的影响及其废弃地植被恢复机理研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2016.
[2] 陈敏, 张大超, 朱清江, 聂锦霞. 离子型稀土矿山废弃地生态修复研究进展[J]. 中国稀土学报, 2017, 35(4): 461-468.
[3] 刘天祥. 粤北某一离子吸附型稀土矿床地质特征分析[J]. 甘肃冶金, 2019, 41(5): 40-44.
[4] 吴华, 朱柱, 徐冬冬. 矿山工业场地生态治理修复研究——以某铜矿为例[J]. 有色冶金节能, 2022, 38(3): 86-89+94.
[5] Whittaker, R.J., Willis, K. and Field, R. (2001) Scale and Species Richness: Towards a General Hierarchical Theory of Species Diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 453-470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Glaser, B., Turrion, M.B., Solomon, D., et al. (2000) Soil Organic Matter Quantity and Quality in Mountain Soils of the Alay Range, Kyrgyz, Affected by Land Use Change. Bi-ology and Fertility of Soils, 31, 407-413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 王长庭, 曹广民, 王启兰, 等. 三江源地区不同建植期人工草地植被特征及其与土壤特征的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2007, 18(11): 2426-2431.
[8] 戴全厚, 刘国彬, 姜峻, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同植被恢复模式对土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(9): 429-434.
[9] Srinivasan, M.P., Bhatia, S. and Shenoy, K. (2015) Vegetation-Environment Relationships in a South Asian Tropical Montane Grassland Ecosystem: Restoration Implications. Tropical Ecology, 56, 201-217.
[10] 张艳, 赵廷宁, 史常青, 等. 坡面植被恢复过程中植被与土壤特征评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(3): 124-131.
[11] McDonald, D.J., Cowling, R.M. and Boucher, C. (1996) Vegetation-Environment Relationships on a Species-Rich Coastal Mountain Range in the Fynbos Biome. Plant Ecology, 123, 165-182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Zhang, J.T., Xi, Y. and Li, J. (2006) The Relationships between Environment and Plant Communities in the Middle Part of Taihang Mountain Range, North China. Community Ecology, 7, 155-163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Canton, Y., Del Barrio, G., Sole-Benet, A., et al. (2004) Topo-graphic Controls on the Spatial Distribution of Ground Cover in the Tabernas Badlands of SE Spain. Catena, 55, 341-365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Fu, B.J., Liu, S.L., Ma, K.M., et al. (2004) Rela-tionships between Soil Characteristics, Topography and Plant Diversity in a Heterogeneous Deciduous Broad-Leaved Forest near Beijing, China. Plant and Soil, 261, 47-54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Zuo, X.A., Zhao, H.L., Zhao, X.Y., et al. (2008) Plant Distribution at the Mobile Dune Scale and Its Relevance to Soil Properties and Topographic Features. Environmental Geology, 54, 1111-1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] 寇晓蓉, 白中科, 杜振州, 等. 黄土区大型露天煤矿企业土地复垦质量控制研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(5): 957-965.
[17] 胡振琪, 赵艳玲. 矿山生态修复面临的主要问题及解决策略[J]. 中国煤炭, 2021, 47(9): 2-7.
[18] Martín, M.C., Martín, D.J.F., Nicolau, I.J.M., et al. (2016) Effects of Topography and Surface Soil Cover on Erosion for Mining Reclamation: The Experimental Spoil Heap at El Machorro Mine (Central Spain). Land Degradation & Development, 27, 145-159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 林洪, 周伶杰, 王继琮. 无人机倾斜摄影技术在大比例尺测图中的应用[J]. 中国金属通报, 2021(11): 118-119.
[20] 蔡煜, 王景燕, 龚伟, 等. 柑橘林下养鸡对土壤团粒结构分形特征的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2017, 34(2): 225-232.
[21] 陈航. 草原露天煤矿内排土场近自然地貌重塑模拟研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2019.
[22] 韩扬眉. “好邻居”豆科树木的“利己主义” [N]. 中国科学报, 2020-07-14(003).
[23] 赵昱, 喻武. 不同株龄紫穗槐对退化黑土土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 高原农业, 2021, 5(4): 353-360.
[24] 张莉, 王金满, 刘涛. 露天煤矿区受损土地景观重塑与再造的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(12): 1235-1246.
[25] 韩建文, 郭生新, 李光耀, 等. 张唐铁路路基边坡防护工程应用及其效果分析[C]//2017年第九届边坡工程大会论文集. 2017: 21-23.
[26] 张琳. 不同植物组合对稀土矿场土壤生态修复的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 仲恺农业工程学院, 2017.
[27] 肖培青, 姚文艺, 李莉, 等. 植被影响下坡面流阻力变化特征研究[J]. 泥沙研究, 2013(3): 1-5.
[28] 中华人民共和国生态环境部. GB 3838-2002地表水环境质量标准[S]. 北京: 国家环境保护总局、国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 2002.
[29] 丁齐. 喷播基材的力学性质及生态功能研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 武汉: 湖北工业大学, 2014.
[30] 辽宁省人民政府办公厅关于印发辽宁省深入推进结构调整“三篇大文章”三年行动方案(2022-2024年)的通知[J]. 辽宁省人民政府公报, 2022(8): 2-48.
[31] 张新平. 土壤改良和植物对赣南某离子型稀土尾矿联合修复研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 南昌: 江西农业大学, 2021.
[32] 邓铭江. 旱区水资源集约利用内涵探析[J]. 中国水利, 2021(14): 8-11+14.