二语句子加工中的歧义消解研究综述
A Critical Review of Research on Second Language Disambiguation in Syntactic Processing
摘要: 句法加工是语言理解的核心所在，因此也成为心理语言学研究领域的重要问题。研究者基于大量相关实验提出了各种句法加工模型和相关假设。其中几个比较主要的有浅层结构假说和Ferreira等学者提出的“足够好”理论。本文将梳理句法加工领域的主要理论，并针对句法加工下的歧义消解做出更详细的阐释，并进一步讨论近几年来相关的实验研究对以上模型和假设的验证、发展，或否定，最后做出总结并对该领域的发展前景做出了展望。
Abstract: Syntactic processing is the core of language, thus an important field in the study of psychological linguistics. Based on numerous experiments and their results, researchers have proposed all kinds of models and hypotheses about syntactic processing. Among them are shallow structure hypothesis and good-enough approach developed by Ferreira and others. This essay is to, by combing through the major theories on syntactic processing, give a detailed explanation on disambiguation, and to discuss how the models and hypotheses are supported, denied, or developed by recent experiments. Finally, this essay offers a conclusion and a prospect of the future research in this field.
文章引用：吴玥琳. 二语句子加工中的歧义消解研究综述[J]. 现代语言学, 2022, 10(10): 2178-2184. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2022.1010294

参考文献

[1] Clahsen, H. and Felser, C. (2006) Grammatical Processing in Language Learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[2] 张辉, 卞京. 二语习得和加工假说与模式:主要观点与分歧[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2016(4): 10-20+147.
[3] 王同顺, 李海龙, 张莉. 中国双语与三语学习者的句法歧义消解研究[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2016(4): 1-9+147.
[4] 胡琳, 陈宝国. 汉-英双语者对英语长距离主谓一致性结构加工的不敏感性[J]. 心理与行为研究, 2014(1): 8-14.
[5] Ferreira, F., Bailey, K.G.D. and Ferraro, V. (2002) Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] Yuan, B. (2017) Can L2 Sentence Processing Strategies Be Native-Like? Evidence from English Speakers’ L2 Processing of Chinese Base-Generated-Topic Sentences. Lingua, 191-192, 42-64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[7] Stepanov, A., Andreetta, S., Stateva, P., Zawiszewski, A. and Laka, I. (2020) Anomaly Detection in the Processing of Complex Syntax by Early L2 Learners. Second Language Research, 36, 371-397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Schwartz, B.D. and Sprouse, R.A. (1996) L2 Cognitive States and the Full Transfer/Full Access Model. Second Language Research, 12, 40-72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Pozzan, L. and Trueswell, J.C. (2016) Second Language Processing and Revision of Garden-Path Sentences: A Visual Word Study. Bilingualism, 19, 636-643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Nakamura, C., Arai, M., Hirose, Y. and Flynn, S. (2020) An Extra Cue Is Beneficial for Native Speakers But Can Be Disruptive for Second Language Learners: Integration of Prosody and Visual Context in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Fujita, H. and Cunnings, I. (2020) Reanalysis and Lingering Misinterpretation of Linguistic Dependencies in Native and Non-Native Sentence Comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 115, Article ID: 104154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] Jacob, G. and Felser, C. (2016) Reanalysis and Semantic Persistence in Native and Non-Native Garden-Path Recovery. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 907-925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Gerth, S., Otto, C., Felser, C. and Nam, Y. (2017) Strength of Garden-Path Effects in Native and Non-Native Speakers’ Processing of Object-Subject Ambiguities. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21, 125-144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Tan, M. and Foltz, A. (2020) Task Sensitivity in L2 English Speakers’ Syntactic Processing: Evidence for Good-Enough Processing in Self-Paced Reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article ID: 575847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]