基于STEAM教育对跨学科背景下工程人才培养的启示探究
Exploring the Implications of STEAM Education on the Cultivation of Engineering Talents in an Interdisciplinary Context
DOI: 10.12677/AE.2022.1210618, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈睿绮：北京工业大学，北京
关键词: STEAM教育；跨学科；工程教育；STEAM Education； Interdisciplinary； Engineering Education
摘要: 跨学科教育是我国工程教育改革发展的新阶段，其发展对我国工科人才提出了新的诉求。然而当前我国工程教育仍存在部分弊端，跨学科人才培养改革亟不可待。STEAM教育作为真实情境下的跨学科教育，其特征为跨学科、创新性、实践性、人文性。通过探讨STEAM教育的发展脉络、教育框架和麻省理工实际案例，为我国开展跨学科人才培养提供切实建议。最终为我国跨学科背景下工程人才培养提出重塑人才培养目标，着重跨学科能力培养、引入项目式教学方法，结合教育技术，提升学生创新思维能力、建设校企合作平台，强化实践能力及人文精神培育、拓宽工程人才的国际化视野，加快工程教育国际化的建议。
Abstract: Interdisciplinary education is a new stage in the reform and development of China’s engineering education, and its development has put forward new demands on China’s engineering talents. However, there are still some shortcomings in China’s engineering education, and the reform of interdisciplinary talent cultivation is urgently needed. STEAM education, as interdisciplinary education in real-life situations, is characterised by interdisciplinarity, innovation, practicability and humanism. By exploring the development of STEAM education, its educational framework and MIT’s actual cases, we provide practical suggestions for the development of interdisciplinary talents in China. Ultimately, it proposes recommendations for the cultivation of engineering talents in the interdisciplinary context in China to reshape the objectives of talent cultivation, focus on the cultivation of interdisciplinary capabilities, introduce project-based teaching methods, combine educational technology to enhance students’ innovative thinking ability, build a school-enterprise cooperation platform to strengthen the cultivation of practical skills and humanistic spirit, broaden the international perspective of engineering talents and accelerate the internationalisation of engineering education.
文章引用：陈睿绮. 基于STEAM教育对跨学科背景下工程人才培养的启示探究[J]. 教育进展, 2022, 12(10): 4041-4048. https://doi.org/10.12677/AE.2022.1210618

参考文献

[1] 彭俊松. 工业4.0驱动下的制造业数字化转型[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2016.
[2] Carayannis, E.G. and Campbell, D.F.J. (2011) Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2, Article No. 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[3] 陈洪捷. 知识生产模式的转变与博士质量的危机[J]. 高等教育研究, 2010, 31(1): 57-63.
[4] 陆国栋, 李拓宇 新工科建设与发展的路径思考[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2017(3): 20-26.
[5] 宋余庆, 陈权, 刘哲, 朱轶, 潘天红, 刘会霞. 新工科背景下工程创新人才国际培养的探索与实践——基于“双跨”团队体验混合式学习模式的建构[J]. 高校教育管理, 2018, 12(3): 102-108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] 王梅, 李梦秀. 斯坦福大学工程学院的跨学科教育及启示[J]. 教育评论, 2018(4): 160-164.
[7] 郝莉, 冯晓云, 宋爱玲, 李君. 新工科背景下跨学科课程建设的思考与实践[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2020(2): 31-40.
[8] 余胜泉, 胡翔. STEM教育理念与跨学科整合模式[J]. 开放教育研究[J]. 开放教育研究, 2015, 21(4): 13-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] 胡天助. STEAM及其对新工科建设的启示[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2018(1): 118-124.
[10] 种楠楠. 新工科背景下STEAM教育理念培养创新应用型工程师探析——以物联网工程专业为例[J]. 物联网技术, 2021, 11(8): 123-125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[11] Connor, A.M., Karmokar, S. and Whittington, C. (2015) From STEM to STEAM: Strategies for Enhancing Engineering & Technology Education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 5, 37-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[12] 吕达, 周满生. 当代外国教育改革著名文献: 美国卷[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 2004.
[13] Domestic Policy Council Office of Science and Technology Policy (2006) American Competitiveness Initiative: Leading the World in Innovation. Domestic Policy Council, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Washington DC.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503266.pdf
[14] 赵慧臣, 陆晓婷. 开展STEAM教育,提高学生创新能力——访美国STEAM教育知名学者格雷特•亚克门教授[J].开放教育研究, 2016, 22(5): 4-10.
[15] 魏晓东, 于冰, 于海波. 美国STEAM教育的框架、特点及启示[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2017, 35(4): 40-46+134-135.
[16] 范文翔, 张一春. STEAM教育: 发展、内涵与可能路径[J]. 现代教育技术, 2018, 28(3): 99-105.
[17] Sochacka, N.W. (2016) Learning Together: A Collaborative Auto Ethnographic Exploration of STEAM (STEM + the Arts) Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 105, 15-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[18] Liao, C. (2016) From Interdisciplinary to Transdisciplinary: An Arts-Integrated Approach to STEAM Education. Art Education, 69, 44-49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[19] 许江. 产品设计专业“递进项目驱动式”教学模式研究[D]: [博士学位论文]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2017.
[20] Reid, R., Bruce, D., Allstaff, K. and McLernon, D. (2006) Vali-dating the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) in the postgraduate context: are health care profession-als ready for IPL? Medical Education, 40, 415-422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] 蒙庆华, 方锦烘, 李一凡, 黄志群. 基于STEAM的机器人教育课程探究与实践[J]. 中国教育信息化, 2020(4): 43-45+49.
[22] https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/electrical-engineering-and-computer-science/6-270-autonomous-robot-design-competition-january-iap-2005/study-materials/notes.pdf
[23] https://www.mghpcc.org/
[24] https://manufactur-ing.mit.edu/careers
[25] https://www.eecs.mit.edu/people/faculty-advisors
[26] http://web.mit.edu/research/topic/
[27] 李丽娟, 杨文斌, 肖明, 章云. 跨学科多专业融合的新工科人才培养模式探索与实践[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2020(1): 25-30.
[28] 赵慧臣, 周昱希, 李彦奇, 刘亚同, 文洁. 跨学科视野下 “工匠型”创新人才的培养策略——基于美国STEAM教育活动设计的启示[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2017, 35(1): 94-101.
[29] 柴干, 郭建华. 新型交叉学科工程人才培养的协同模式探究[J]. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 21(S2): 137-141.
[30] Reif, R., et al. (2014) Institute-Wide Task Force on the Future of MIT Education—Final Report. Massachusetts Institute of Tech-nology, Massachusetts.
[31] Kamp, A. (2016) Engineering Education in the Rapidly Changing World. Delft University of Technology, Delft.
[32] 钟登华. 新工科建设的内涵与行动[J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2017(3): 1-6.

为你推荐