三种山茶属植物的木材解剖学研究
Wood Anatomy Research of Three Plants of Camellia L.
DOI: 10.12677/WJF.2022.114027, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 陈沂章*, 李 芳, 石文婷, 吴 宪:东莞植物园,广东 东莞;王露露, 王 军:中国热带农业科学院海南热带农业资源研究院,中国热带农业科学院热带生物技术研究所,农业农村部热带作物生物学与遗传资源利用重点实验室,海南 海口
关键词: 山茶属大苞白山茶杜鹃叶山茶茶梅木材解剖学研究>br< Camellia L. C. granthamiana C. azalea C. sasanqua Wood Anatomy Research
摘要: 为更好地识别山茶属(Camellia L.)大苞白山茶(Camellia granthamiana Sealy)、杜鹃叶山茶(Camellia azalea C. F. Wei)及茶梅(Camellia sasanqua Thunb.)的木材解剖学特征,本文从植物树皮、木材宏观及微观构造进行了详细观测。研究表明:树皮:大苞白山茶干燥时灰白色;光滑,纵向裂纹肉眼下不明显,偶见有瘤状小突起;杜鹃叶山茶和茶梅干燥时分别为褐色和棕色;粗糙,纵向裂纹明显。三者树皮较薄,厚度约0.5 mm,心边材区别不明显;有或略有光泽;无气味和滋味;生长轮略明显;髓心黄色至金黄色,具有白色内含物,富含晶体;轴向薄壁组织无或不明显。大苞白山茶为散孔材至似半环孔材,单管孔或短径列复管孔(多为2个,稀3个),杜鹃叶山茶和茶梅为散孔材,以单管孔为主,其次短径列复管孔(多为2个);管孔形状呈不规则多角形或椭圆形、近圆形;管间纹孔式梯列,数目甚多,220~390个/mm2,径切面上明显,弦切面上可见;导管分子穿孔板横列,偶见斜列。木射线:非叠生,以异形I型为主,其次为异形III型(大苞白山茶)、异形单列(杜鹃叶山茶和茶梅),常见多列射线融成单列;木射线密度(大苞白山茶15~20条/mm、杜鹃叶山茶和茶梅20~25条/mm);射线宽度1~2细胞;射线高度(大苞白山茶5~15个细胞、杜鹃叶山茶3~30个细胞、茶梅2~36个细胞);射线细胞较大,内含有树胶,常见巨型菱形、长方形或不规则形晶体,存在晶体的细胞常膨大;径切面上,横卧射线细胞垂直壁节状(其中大苞白山茶可见细胞核);木纤维为纤维状管胞,在横切面上呈不规则多角形。髓心细胞呈圆形或椭圆形,边缘稍规则;细胞直径15~60 μm;大多细胞富含树胶;部分细胞富含晶体。综上所述,大苞白山茶与杜鹃叶山茶、茶梅的木材解剖结构具有较大差异,而后两者非常接近,与其他山茶属植物比较研究发现,差别较小。本研究旨在为该属植物的木材鉴定、系统分类和植物保护提供依据。
Abstract: In order to better identify the wood anatomical charac-teristics of Camellia granthamiana Sealy, Camellia azalea C. F. Wei and Camellia sasanqua Thunb., this paper has carried out detailed observation on the macro-structure and micro-structure of plant wood and bark. The experiment results indicated that: The bark of C. granthamiana was gray when dry; smooth, longitudinal crack not obvious under the naked eye, and occasionally with protuber-ances like tumor; the bark of C. azalea and C. sasanqua was sepia and brown respectively when dry; rough, longitudinal crack obvious. The bark of three species were relatively thin, with a thickness of about 0.5 mm, and the difference between the heart-sapwood was not obvious; wood with or slightly glossy, no smell or taste, the growth ring was slightly obvious, the pith was yellow to golden yellow with white inclusions and abundant crystals; Axial parenchyma was absent or not obvious. C. gran-thamiana: Diffuse-porous wood to near semi-ring-porous wood, Single pore or short radial multiple pore (mostly 2, rarely 3), C. azalea and C. sasanqua: Diffuse-porous wood, mainly single pore, sec-ondly short radial multiple pore (mostly 2); the shape of pore was irregular polygonal or elliptical, nearly round; Intervessel pitting scalariform, numerous, 220~390/mm2. It’s obvious on radial sec-tion and visible on tangential section; Perforation plate of vessel element transverse, occasionally oblique. The timber rays: Non-overlapping, mainly heterogeneous I type, secondly heterogeneous III type (C. granthamiana) or heterogeneous single type (C. azalea and C. sasanqua), multiple rays merge into a single commonly; timber ray density (C. granthamiana 15~20/mm, C. azalea and C. sasanqua 20~25/mm); timber ray width 1~2 cells; Timber ray height (C. granthamiana 5~15 cells, C. azalea 3~30 cells, C. sasanqua 2~36 cells); timber ray cells are large and contain gum, usually with giant rhombic, rectangular or irregular crystals, the cells with crystals are often enlarged; On radial section, vertically wall of recumbent ray cells are nodal (nucleus visible in C. granthamiana com-monly); Wood fibers are fibrous tracheids with irregular polygonal shapes in cross sections. Pith core cells round or elliptic, the edges lightly regular. Cell diameter 15~60 μm; Most cells are rich in gum; Some cells are rich in crystals. To sum up, the timber anatomical structure of C. granthamiana was quite different from that of C. azalea and C. sasanqua, the latter two were similar, compared with other camellia plants: The difference is small. The aim of this study was to provide a basis for the research on the wood identification, systematic classification and plant conservation.
文章引用:陈沂章, 李芳, 石文婷, 吴宪, 王露露, 王军. 三种山茶属植物的木材解剖学研究[J]. 林业世界, 2022, 11(4): 215-226. https://doi.org/10.12677/WJF.2022.114027

参考文献

[1] Von Linnaeus, C. (1753) Camellia. Species Plantarum. Vol. 2, Impensis Laurentii Salvii, Stockholm, 698.
[2] 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志: 第49卷第三分册. 山茶科[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998: 1-251.
[3] 王俐娟, 曾秋梅, 王晓琴. 3组山茶属植物油脂研究进展[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2017, 32(11): 165-171.
[4] 魏佳, 陈小龙, 孙华, 等. 油用山茶属植物育种与利用研究进展[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2012, 24(3): 533-540.
[5] 王钰彤. 三种山茶属植物叶片降脂活性评价及差异物质挖掘[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2018.
[6] 牟继平, 徐峰. 广西山茶属木材解剖构造研究[J]. 广西农业生物科学, 2004, 23(2): 122-126.
[7] 牟继平, 徐峰, 梁宏温. 广西山茶属木材解剖分子研究[J]. 广西林业科学, 2007, 36(2): 78-81.
[8] 徐峰, 谢福惠, 梁盛业. 广西金花茶木材解剖研究[J]. 广西植物, 1989, 9(3): 249-254.
[9] 陈朋, 杨蕾蕾, 张苏州, 等. 大苞白山茶胚性愈伤的诱导及植株再生[J]. 植物生理学报, 2019, 55(6): 767-773.
[10] Editorial Committee of Flora of China (2007) Flora of China: Camellia. Vol. 12, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 367-412.
[11] Li, W.X., Shi, X.G., Guo, W.X., et al. (2018) Characterization of the Complete Chloroplast Genome of Camellia granthamiana (Theaceae), a Vulnerable Species En-demic to China. Mitochondrial DNA Part B, 3, 1139-1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 黄万坚, 刘信凯, 高继银. 杜鹃红山茶(Camellia azalea)生物学特性及园林应用价值[C]// 2008年全国植物园学术年会论文集. 中国植物学会植物园分会编辑委员会: 中国林业出版社, 2008: 81-87.
[13] 王霜, 王仲朗, 梁静, 等. 濒危植物杜鹃红山茶的细胞学研究[J]. 云南植物研究, 2007, 29(6): 655-658.
[14] 罗晓莹, 莫罗坚, 庄雪影. 杜鹃红山茶大小孢子发生及雌雄配子体发育研究[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2010, 31(4): 68-71+75.
[15] 李辛雷. 杜鹃红山茶遗传多样性及其濒危机制[D]: [博士学位论文]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2012: 1-108.
[16] 刘就, 陈考科, 林喜珀, 等. 杜鹃红山茶的栽培技术[J]. 中国热带农业, 2007(1): 61-62.
[17] 章丹峰, 齐鸣, 楼晓明, 等. 25个茶梅品种生物学特性及直立型筛选评析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2021, 62(10): 2011-2013+2119.
[18] 马俊蓉, 薛春迎, 李永梅. 两种山茶属植物化学成分的HPLC-MS分析[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2015, 30(6): 974-981.
[19] 吴迪迪, 朱启航, 蒋加树, 等. 鲜茶梅花挥发油化学成分的分析及清楚DPPH自由基的能力[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2015, 29(1): 65-69.
[20] 王洁, 李辛雷, 范正琪, 等. 不同茶梅品种花朵挥发性成分研究[J]. 广西植物, 2018, 38(7): 934-942.
[21] 杨建芬, 张寿洲, 刘金梅, 等. 大苞白山茶组培、保育及推广应用[Z]. 国家科技成果, 2014.
[22] 刘雅思. 广东省珍稀植物DNA条形码与分子鉴定[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 广州: 仲恺农业工程学院, 2019: 1-121.
[23] 罗晓莹, 庄雪影, 杨跃生. 杜鹃红山茶遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2007, 15(2): 93-100.
[24] 钟乃盛, 严丹峰, 柯欢, 等. 杜鹃红山茶与29个山茶属原生种间的杂交亲和性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(7): 140-145+148.
[25] 王江英, 朱朋波, 葛金涛, 等. 杜鹃红山茶ACO1的克隆及其表达分析研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(8): 2175-2182.
[26] 林田, 李天菲, 杨华, 等. 茶梅品种资源的收集保存、鉴定评价及种质创新[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2012, 13(2): 207-211.
[27] 李辛雷, 孙振元, 李纪元, 等. 广东鹅凰嶂自然保护区杜鹃红山茶种群结构与空间分布格局[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(8): 2115-2121.
[28] 朱启航, 赵秀玲. 茶梅茎叶中挥发油化学成分的分析[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2015, 29(1): 61-64+69.
[29] 马俊蓉, 薛春迎, 李永梅. 两种山茶属植物化学成分的HPLC-MS分析[J]. 云南农业大学学报, 2015, 30(6): 974-981.
[30] 王洁, 李辛雷, 殷恒福, 等. 茶梅品种‘冬玫瑰’不同花期及花器官的香气组成成分分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2018, 27(1): 37-43.
[31] 韩国勇. 不同茶梅品种杂交亲和性分析[J]. 热带作物学报, 2018, 39(12): 2377-2382.
[32] 马翔, 李辉, 郭霄, 等. 不同氮沉降对耐冬山茶和茶梅生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 38(4): 262-272.
[33] 环境保护部和中国科学院. 中国生物多样性红色名录——高等植物卷[EB/OL].
https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/bgg/201309/t20130912_260061.htm, 2013-09-02.
[34] 林草局农业农村部. 国家重点保护野生植物名录[EB/OL].
http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-09/09/content_5636409.htm, 2021-09-07.
[35] 王军, 段瑞军, 黄圣卓, 等. 西沙群岛4种木材的解剖学研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2020, 41(3): 603-608.
[36] 成俊卿, 杨家驹, 刘鹏. 中国木材志[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1992: 449.
[37] 成俊卿, 李秾, 孙成志, 等. 中国热带及亚热带木材识别、材性和利用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1980.
[38] 张宏达. 山茶属植物的系统研究[Z]. 广东: 中山大学学报, 1981.
[39] 喻诚鸿. 次生木质部的进化与植物系统发育的关系[J]. 植物学报, 1954, 3(2): 183-196.
[40] Ruiz, N., Ward, D. and Saltz, S. (2002) Calcium Oxalate Crystals in Leaves of Pancratium sickenbergeri: Constitutive or Induced Defence? Functional Ecology, 16, 99-105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[41] Li, Z.L. and Li, R.A. (1981) Anatomical Observations of Assimilating Branches of Nine Xerophytes in Gansu. Chinese Bulletin of Bota-ny, 23, 181-185.
[42] Liu, J.Q. (1982) Xerophilous Structures of Desert Plants in Different Ecological Types. Journal of Plant Ecology, 6, 314-319.
[43] Su, P.X., An, Z.L., Ma, R.J., et al. (2005) Wreath Structure and C4 Photosynthetic Characteristics of Desert Plants Ammodendron and Calligonum mongolicum. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 29, 1-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[44] Xu, J.J., Ci, H.C., He, X.D., et al. (2012) The Calcium Crystals and Calcium Component Characteristics of 54 Plants in Salinization Habitat in Tianjin. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 23, 1247-1253.