隐性适应不良风格问卷在基层军官中的信效度检验
Reliability and Validity Testing of Looming Maladaptive Style Questionnaire in the First-Line PLA Officers
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.1210418, PDF,   
作者: 田 彬:上海建桥学院心理健康教育与咨询中心,上海;海军军医大学心理学系,上海;陈 曦:国防大学政治学院,上海;蔡文鹏, 严 进:海军军医大学心理学系,上海
关键词: 隐性认知风格隐性适应不良风格问卷焦虑抑郁基层军官Looming Cognitive Style Looming Maladaptive Style Questionnaire Anxiety Depression First-Line PLA Officer
摘要: 目的:检验隐性适应不良风格问卷在基层军官中的信效度。方法:采用隐性适应不良风格问卷对464名陆、海、空军的基层军官进行了调查,其中陆军的32人3周后进行了重复测量。被试同时还完成了焦虑敏感指数量表-3、社会交往焦虑量表、抑郁–焦虑–应激量表、状态–特质焦虑问卷(特质部分)的测量。结果:隐性认知风格问卷具有良好的项目区分度;总量表、生理威胁和社交威胁两个分量表的内部一致性信度为0.930、0.887和0.892,分半信度和重测信度也介于0.691~0.906之间;因素分析结果表明,问卷可分为6个因子,与原问卷6个情境的设置相一致。结论:隐性适应不良风格问卷具合理的结构。中文版问卷在中国基层军官中具有良好的信、效度,可以作为测量基层军官隐性认知风格的一种有效工具使用。
Abstract: Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the Reliability and Validity Testing of the Looming Maladaptive Style Questionnaire (LMSQ-R) in first-line PLA officers. Method: A total of 464 Army, Navy and Air Force first-line PLA officers were assessed with LMSQ-R, which was re-peated three weeks later in 32 army officers. Meanwhile, the participants also completed meas-ures of Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3, Social Interaction Anxiety Scale, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (trait part). Results: Looming Maladaptive Style Ques-tionnaire has good item discrimination; the internal consistency reliability of the total scale, phy-siological threat subscale and social threat subscale were 0.930, 0.887 and 0.892, and the split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were also between 0.691 and 0.906. The results of factor analysis show that the questionnaire can be divided into 6 factors, which is consistent with the setting of the original questionnaire in 6 situations. Conclusion: The structure of the LMSQ-R is reasonable. The Chinese version of the LMSQ-R has shown good reliability and validity in first-line PLA officers and can be used as an effective tool to measure the looming cognitive style of first-line PLA officers.
文章引用:田彬, 陈曦, 蔡文鹏, 严进 (2022). 隐性适应不良风格问卷在基层军官中的信效度检验. 心理学进展, 12(10), 3434-3441. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2022.1210418

参考文献

[1] 蔡文鹏, 肖婕, 等(2015). 中国青年军人社会期望现况凋查及其对情绪状态和心理健康的影响. 第三军医大学学报, 37(22), 2244-2248.
[2] 李小玲, 唐海波, 等(2012). 抑郁-焦虑-压力量表信效度研究述评. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20(3), 350-352.
[3] 刘家鑫(2014). 不同社交焦虑水平大学生注意偏向特点的眼动研究. 硕士学位论文, 保定: 河北大学.
[4] 王雷, 刘婉婷, 等(2014). 焦虑敏感指数量表3版中文版测评健康成年女性的效度和信度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 28(10), 767-771.
[5] 王玉婷, 朱熊兆, 等(2013). 焦虑敏感指数-3中文版在乳腺癌患者中的应用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(6), 974-976.
[6] 心理学名词审定委员会(2014). 心理学名词(第2版). 科学出版社.
[7] 叶冬梅, 钱铭怡, 等(2007). 社会交往焦虑量表和社交恐惧量表的修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 15(2), 115-117.
[8] 张迪, 崔胜宇, 等(2019). 抑郁-焦虑-压力量表中文版在临床医学本科生中应用的信效度评价. 护理研究, 33(9), 1494-1497.
[9] 郑晓华, 李延知(1997). 状态-特质焦虑问卷. 中国心理卫生杂志, 11(4), 28-29.
[10] Adler, A. D., & Strunk, D. R. (2010). Looming Maladaptive Style as a Moderator of Risk Factors for Anxiety. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 34, 59-68.[CrossRef
[11] Beck, R., & Perkins, T. S. (2001). Cognitive Content-Specificity for Anxiety and Depression: A Meta-Analysis. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 25, 651-663.[CrossRef
[12] Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (2009). Cognitive Therapy of Anxiety Disorders: Science and Practice. The Guilford Press.
[13] Heidenreich, T., Schermelleh-Engel, K. et al. (2011). The Factor Structure of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 579-583.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2011). The Short-Form Version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct Validity and Normative Data in a Large Non-Clinical Sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227-239.[CrossRef
[15] Riskind, J. H., Sica, C. et al. (2021). Looming Cognitive Style More Consistently Predicts Anxiety than Depressive Symptoms: Evidence from a 3-Wave Yearlong Study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 45, 745-758.[CrossRef
[16] Riskind, J. H., Tzur, D. et al. (2007). Short-Term Predictive Effects of the Looming Cognitive Style on Anxiety Disorder Symptoms under Restrictive Methodological Conditions. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 45, 1765-1777.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Riskind, J. H., Williams, N. L. et al. (2000). The Looming Maladaptive Style: Anxiety, Danger, and Schematic Processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 837-852.[CrossRef
[18] Williams, N. L., Shahar, G. et al. (2005). The Looming Maladaptive Style Predicts Shared Variance in Anxiety Disorder Symptoms: Further Support for a Cognitive Model of Vulnerability to Anxiety. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 19, 157-175.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Yeo, G. C., Hong, R. Y. et al. (2020). Looming Cognitive Style and Its Associations with Anxiety and Depression: A Meta-Analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 44, 445-467.[CrossRef