有图有真相？网络谣言如何影响老年人的判断
Is There Truth with Picture? How Internet Rumors Affect the Judgment of the Elderly
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2022.1210430, PDF,   
作者: 杨 琰：辽宁师范大学心理学院，辽宁 大连
关键词: 老年人；认知流畅性；真实性效应；The Aged； Cognitive Fluency； Effect of Truthiness
摘要: 在当今的数字时代，网络谣言层出不穷。本文通过分析后真相时代的老年人受骗现状和原因，结合认知流畅性与真实性效应的相关研究文献，探讨网络谣言如何影响老年人的信息判断的问题，为老年人诈骗受害研究开辟了新的研究视角与思路。可在一定程度上揭示老年人网络受骗的影响因素，为实现对老年诈骗被害的精准预测与防范起到一定参考作用。
Abstract: In today’s digital age, online rumors are endless. By analyzing the current situation and reasons of the elderly fraud in the post-truth era, combined with the relevant research literature on cognitive fluency and authenticity effect, this paper discusses how network rumors affect the information judgment of the elderly, and opens up a new research perspective and ideas for the research of fraud victims of the elderly. To a certain extent, it can reveal the influencing factors of the elderly network fraud, and play a certain reference role in realizing the accurate prediction and prevention of the elderly fraud murder.
文章引用：杨琰 (2022). 有图有真相？网络谣言如何影响老年人的判断. 心理学进展, 12(10), 3538-3543. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2022.1210430

参考文献

[1] 敖玲敏, 吕厚超, 黄希庭(2011). 社会情绪选择理论概述. 心理科学进展, 19(2), 217-223.
[2] 李媛媛, 单承芸(2020). 我国中老年人金融受骗影响因素研究——基于CHARLS2015的实证分析. 南方人口, 35(1), 13-26.
[3] 吴玲, 程叶青(2015). 公共空间内犯罪被害性别差异的阐释: 基于整合性的理论视角. 人文地理, 30(1), 45-49.
[4] Brashier, N. M., Umanath, S., Cabeza, R., & Marsh, E. J. (2017). Competing Cues: Older Adults Rely on Knowledge in the Face of Fluency. Psychology and Aging, 32, 331-337.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Cansino, S., Estrada-Manilla, C., Hernández-Ramos, E., MartínezGalindo, J. G., Torres-Trejo, F., Gómez-Fernández, T., AyalaHernández, M., Osorio, D., Cedillo-Tinoco, M., Garcés-Flores, L., Gómez-Melgarejo, S., Beltrán-Palacios, K., Guadalupe García-Lázaro, H., García-Gutiérrez, F., Cadena-Arenas, Y., Fernández-Apan, L., Bärtschi, A., Resendiz-Vera, J., & Rodríguez-Ortiz, M. D. (2013). The Rate of Source Memory Decline across the Adult Lifespan. Developmental Psychology, 49, 973-985.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Cassidy, B. S., Hedden, T., Yoon, C., & Gutchess, A. H. (2014). Age Differences in Medial Prefrontal Activity for Subsequent Memory of Truth Value. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 87.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Cassidy, B., & Gutchess, A. (2012). Social Relevance Enhances Memory for Impressions in Older Adults. Memory, 20, 332-345.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Derksen, D. G., Giroux, M. E., Newman, E. J., & Bernstein, D. M. (2022). Stable Truthiness Effect across the Lifespan. Developmental Psychology, 85, 913-922.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Fenn, E., Newman, E. J., Pezdek, K., & Garry, M. (2013). The Effect of Nonprobative Photographs on Truthiness Persists Over Time. Acta Psychologica, 144, 207-211.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Newman, E. J., Garry, M., Bernstein, D. M., Kantner, J., & Lindsay, D. S. (2012). Nonprobative Photographs (or Words) Inflate Truthiness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 969-974.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Newman, E. J., Garry, M., Unkelbach, C., Bernstein, D. M., Lindsay, D. S., & Nash, R. A. (2015). Truthiness and Falsiness of Trivia Claims Depend on Judgmental Contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 41, 1337-1348.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). The Secret Life of Fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 237-241.
[13] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Reber, R., Wurtz, P., & Zimmermann, T. D. (2004). Exploring “Fringe” Consciousness: The Subjective Experience of Perceptual Fluency and Its Objective Bases. Conscious Cognition, 13, 47-60.[CrossRef] 
[15] Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332-348.[CrossRef] 
[16] Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, Misattribution, and Judgments of Well-Being: Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513-523.
[17] [CrossRef] 
[18] Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2007). Feelings and Phenomenal Experiences. In A. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social Psychology. Handbook of Basic Principles (2nd ed., pp. 385-407). Guilford.
[19] Strough, J., Karns, T. E., & Schlosnagle, L. (2011). Decision-Making Heuristics and Biases across the Lifespan. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235, 57-74.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Westerman, D. L., Lloyd, M. E., & Miller, J. K. (2002). The Attribution of Perceptual Fluency in Recognition Memory: The Role of Expectation. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 607-617.[CrossRef] 
[21] Wilson, J. C., & Westerman, D. L. (2018). Picture (Im)Perfect: Illusions of Recognition Memory Produced by Photographs at Test. Memory & Cognition, 46, 1210-1221.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Zhang, L., Newman, E. J., & Schwarz, N. (2021). When Photos Backfire: Truthiness and Falsiness Effects in Comparative Judgements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 92, Article ID: 104054.
[23] [CrossRef]