浅析醉酒型危险驾驶罪
Brief Analysis of Drunken Dangerous Driving Crime
摘要: 醉酒型危险驾驶罪的主观方面是间接故意,即主观上行为人意识到醉酒驾驶机动车就满足成立条件。客观方面的机动车应包含超标电动车;道路需具有公共性和公众性;对醉酒的认定可以在达到数值的基础上辅以其他测试,以保证准确性。在量刑规则上,该罪可以适用自首、但书规定;基于法律适用公平及效率等原因,建议扩大缓刑适用。对于两种“非典型”情形,需结合成立要件及量刑规则具体情况具体分析。
Abstract:
The subjective aspect of the crime of drunken dangerous driving is indirect intent, that is, when the actor is aware of driving a motor vehicle under the influence of intoxication, the conditions for its establishment are satisfied. Objective aspects of motor vehicles should include exceeding the standard electric vehicles; Roads should be public and common; The determination of drunkenness can be supplemented with other tests to ensure accuracy. In the sentencing rules, the crime can be applied to surrender, Proviso provisions; Based on the fairness and efficiency of law application, it is suggested to expand the application of probation. For the two “atypical” cases, it is necessary to combine the establishment requirements and the sentencing rules of the specific situation of the specific analysis.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
赵卫平, 范顺志. 对醉驾型危险驾驶罪治理的探讨[J]. 法制博览, 2020(9): 18-20.
|
|
[2]
|
单婷. “醉酒型”危险驾驶罪之认定与完善[J]. 湖北职业技术学院学报, 2020, 23(1): 106-112.
|
|
[3]
|
瞿义强, 周瑞芬. 如何理解危险驾驶罪中的“醉酒驾驶”行为[J]. 中国检察官, 2019(24): 63-64.
|
|
[4]
|
王志祥, 敦宁. 危险驾驶罪探析[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2011(7): 49-56.
|
|
[5]
|
董玉庭, 黄大威. 危险驾驶罪的规范与完善[J]. 学术交流, 2011(8): 57-62.
|
|
[6]
|
张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 第四版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2011.
|
|
[7]
|
尹彦品, 王艳荣. 醉酒型危险驾驶罪回顾与完善刍议[J]. 河北法学, 2022, 40(4): 185-200.
|
|
[8]
|
蒋运军. 浅论司法实践中醉酒型危险驾驶罪的自首情节[J]. 法制博览, 2018(21): 133.
|
|
[9]
|
李川. 论危险驾驶行为入罪的客观标准[J]. 法学评论, 2012, 30(4): 113-120.
|
|
[10]
|
杨适应. 论醉酒型危险驾驶罪排除但书出罪[J]. 山西省政法管理干部学院学报, 2019, 32(4): 75-78.
|
|
[11]
|
周光权. 论刑事一体化视角的危险驾驶罪[J]. 政治与法律, 2022(1): 14-30.
|