食管早癌ESD术后疗效评估及血清指标水平变化
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Changes of Se-rum Markers after ESD for Early Esophageal Cancer
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2022.12111439, PDF,   
作者: 于海恩:青岛大学附属青岛市市立医院,山东 青岛;高玉强*:青岛市市立医院消化内科,山东 青岛
关键词: 食管早癌ESD治疗效果血清指标Early Esophageal Cancer ESD Therapeutic Effect Serum Indicators
摘要: 目的:观察食管早癌内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)术后疗效,并对比分析血清指标水平差异。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2021年10月在青岛市市立医院消化内镜中心行ESD治疗的100例食管早癌患者,评估患者治疗效果。并选取同期100例食管良性病变及健康查体患者,对比CA199、CA125、癌胚抗原(CEA)、鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCC)、中性粒细胞–淋巴细胞比率(NLR)血清指标水平变化。结果:100例行ESD治疗的食管早癌患者平均住院时间为(8.65 ± 1.65)天,平均手术时间为(57.28 ± 15.40)天,有效切除率(89/100)%、无效切除率(11/100)%,术后出血13例,食管狭窄2例,食管穿孔0例。食管早癌组患者术前血清CA199、CA125、CEA、SCC、NLR水平明显高于食管良性病变组、健康组,而食管早癌组患者术后3个月的血清CA199、CA125、CEA、SCC、NLR水平明显低于术后1个月,通过随访检测血清指标,食管早癌无效切除患者ESD术后6个月的血清CA125、CEA、SCC、NLR水平明显高于有效切除组,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:ESD是治疗食管早癌的有效方法,食管早癌术后CA125、CEA、SCC、NLR水平明显降低,其水平变化与疗效相关,临床可应用于食管早癌的术前评估及疗效预测。
Abstract: Objective: To observe the effect of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early esophageal cancer, and compare the difference of serum markers. Methods: Retrospective analysis was made on 100 patients with early esophageal cancer who received ESD treatment in the Digestive Endos-copy Center of Qingdao Municipal Hospital from January 2017 to October 2021, and the treatment effect was evaluated. In the same period, 100 patients with benign esophageal diseases and healthy people were selected to compare the changes of serum CA199, CA125, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC) and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Results: The average hospitalization time of 100 patients with early esophageal cancer treated with ESD was (8.65 ± 1.65) days, the average operation time was (57.28 ± 15.40) days, the effective resection rate was (89/100)%, the ineffective resection rate was (11/100)%, 13 patients suffered from postoper-ative bleeding, 2 patients suffered from esophageal stenosis, and 0 patients suffered from esopha-geal perforation. The levels of serum CA199, CA125, CEA, SCC, NLR in patients with early esophageal cancer before operation were significantly higher than those in patients with benign esophageal le-sions and healthy people, while the levels of serum CA199, CA125, CEA, SCC, NLR in patients with early esophageal cancer 3 months after operation were significantly lower than those in patients with early esophageal cancer 1 month after operation. Through follow-up and detection of serum indicators, the levels of serum CA125, CEA, SCC, NLR in patients with early esophageal cancer who failed to resect ESD 6 months after operation were significantly higher than those in patients with effective resection, The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: ESD is an effec-tive method for the treatment of early esophageal cancer. The levels of CA125, CEA, SCC and NLR decreased significantly after the operation of early esophageal cancer, and their changes are related to the curative effect. It can be used in the preoperative evaluation and prognosis of early esopha-geal cancer.
文章引用:于海恩, 高玉强. 食管早癌ESD术后疗效评估及血清指标水平变化[J]. 临床医学进展, 2022, 12(11): 9983-9989. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2022.12111439

参考文献

[1] Sung, H., Ferlay, J. and Siegel, R.L. (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71, 209-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Watanabe, M., Otake, R., Kozuki, R., Toihata, T., Takahashi, K., et al. (2020) Recent Progress in Multidisciplinary Treatment for Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Surgery Today, 50, 12-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 杨怿, 李雪, 程芮, 陈炜, 陈楚岩, 等. 消化道早癌内镜成像技术的研究进展[J]. 首都医科大学学报, 2022, 43(1): 47-52.
[4] Washington, M.K., Goldberg, R.M., Chang, G.J., Limburg, P. and Lam, A.K. (2021) Diagnosis of Digestive System Tumours. International Journal of Cancer, 148, 1040-1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Misumi, Y. and Nonaka, K. (2021) Prevention and Management of Complications and Education in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10, Article No. 2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Maeda, Y., Hirasawa, D., Fujita, N., Suzuki, T. and Obana, T., et al. (2011) Mediastinal Emphysema after Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Its Prevalence and Clinical Sig-nificance. Digestive Endoscopy, 23, 221-226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Yang, X.Q., Chen, C., Wang, F.B., Peng, C.W. and Li, Y. (2011) Preoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Carbohydrate Antigen19-9 and Carbohydrate Antigen 125 as Prognostic Factors for Recurrence-Free Survival in Colorectal Cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 12, 1251-1256.
[8] 陈秀英, 陈怡舟, 徐红, 李佳芯, 肖雄. 血清及胸腔积液中CA19-9、SCC-Ag及CYFRA21-1对肺癌诊断意义的对比研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2018, 18(19): 3733-3736+3794.
[9] He, W., Yin, C., Guo, G., Jiang, C., Wang, F., et al. (2013) Initial Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio Is Superior to Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio as an Adverse Prognostic and Predictive Factor in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Medical Oncology, 30, Article No. 439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Tas, F., Faruk Aykan, N., Aydiner, A., Yasasever, V. and Topuz, E. (2001) Measurement of Serum CA 19-9 May Be More Valuable than CEA in Prediction of Recurrence in Patients with Gastric Cancer. American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24, 148-149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] 王永连, 赵英政, 徐光翠, 姚文健, 郭领, 等. 血清肿瘤标志物水平及其联合检测对食管癌的诊断意义[J]. 重庆医学, 2016, 45(3): 419-420+430.
[12] 曹红, 江华. 血清鳞状上皮细胞癌相关抗原、癌胚抗原、神经元特异性烯醇化酶及细胞角蛋白19片段抗原检测在食管癌诊断中的价值[J]. 中国医药导报, 2013, 10(14): 96-97+100.
[13] Tian, S.B., Yu, J.C., Kang, W.M., Ma, Z.Q., Ye, X., et al. (2014) Combined Detection of CEA, CA 19-9, CA 242 and CA 50 in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Resectable Gastric Cancer. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 15, 6295-6300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese Gas-tric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer, 14, 113-123.
[15] Ko, W.J., Kim, Y.M., Yoo, I.K. and Cho, J.Y. (2018) Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Early Gastric Cancer in Patients Beyond the In-dications of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Surgical Endoscopy, 32, 3798-3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Draganov, P.V., Wang, A.Y., Othman, M.O. and Fukami, N. (2019) AGA Institute Clinical Practice Update: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the United States. Clinical Gas-troenterology and Hepatology, 17, 16-25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 丁娟, 曹名波, 马志杰. 早期食管癌患者内镜下黏膜剥离术后延迟性出血的危险因素分析[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2022, 37(7): 1144-1146.
[18] 牟钊, 陈雨琳, 杨国栋. 内镜黏膜下剥离术后食管狭窄相关危险因素分析[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2021, 26(11): 1470-1474.
[19] 孙科, 吴永梅. 异常糖链糖蛋白在食管、胃、大肠癌前病变中的相关研究[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2015, 26(3): 508-510.
[20] Gao, Y., Wang, J., Zhou, Y., Sheng, S., Qian, S.Y. and Huo, X. (2018) Evaluation of Serum CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4, CA125 and Ferritin as Diagnostic Markers and Factors of Clinical Parameters for Colorectal Cancer. Scientific Reports, 8, Article No. 2732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] Siegel, R.L., Miller, K.D. and Jemal, A. (2017) Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 67, 7-30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Zhang, S., Lu, X., Hu, C., Li, Y., Yang, H., et al. (2020) Serum Metabo-lomics for Biomarker Screening of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Esophageal Squamous Dysplasia Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. ACS Omega, 5, 26402-26412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Sharaiha, R.Z., Halazun, K.J., Mirza, F., Port, J.L., Lee, P.C., et al. (2011) Elevated Preoperative Neutrophil: Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of Postoperative Disease Recurrence in Esophageal Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 18, 3362-3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] 桑怀鸣, 蒋建霞. 内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗食管高级别上皮内瘤变的疗效分析[J]. 临床消化病杂志, 2018, 30(2): 67-72.
[25] 郑家垚, 林峥嵘, 许炎钦, 陈洋洋, 郑晓玲, 等. 浅表食管癌及癌前病变内镜黏膜下剥离术后水平切缘阳性高危因素分析及随访研究[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2020, 26(8): 13-19.