国际投资仲裁中的法庭之友价值重塑与规则构建
Amicus Curiae Value Remodeling and Rule Construction in International Investment Arbitration
摘要: 法庭之友源于英美法系的国内诉讼制度,其在国际投资仲裁中的诞生并非制度的精心设计,而是实践先行,是国际投资仲裁对于透明度和民主性批评的回应。因此,法庭之友制度被赋予了提高国际投资仲裁透明度和加强民主参与,甚至是全球治理的价值期待。通过分析不同仲裁庭的实践,法庭之友制度的真正价值,仍然在于辅助仲裁庭解决投资争端,相关规则构建也应围绕这一根本目的展开。国际投资仲裁也应回归其宗旨,通过解决投资争端,同时对舆论有所回应,从而获得公众对其合法性的认同。
Abstract: Amicus curiae originated from the domestic litigation system of the common law system. The birth of amicus curiae in international investment arbitration was not an elaborate design of the system, but a practice first, a response to criticism of transparency and democracy in international investment arbitration. Thus, the amicus curiae system has been given the value ex-pectation of enhancing transparency and strengthening democratic participation in international investment arbitration, and even global governance. By analyzing the practices of different arbitral tribunals, the real value of the amicus curiae system still lies in assisting arbitral tribunals to re-solve investment disputes, and the relevant rules should be constructed around this fundamental purpose. International investment arbitration should also return to its purpose of gaining public recognition of its legitimacy by resolving investment disputes and responding to public opinion at the same time.
文章引用:周昕亮. 国际投资仲裁中的法庭之友价值重塑与规则构建[J]. 争议解决, 2022, 8(4): 792-799. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2022.84107

参考文献

[1] Salmon, J. (2001) Dictionnaire de Droit International Public. Bruylant Bruxelles, 62-63.
[2] 张泽涛. 美国“法院之友”制度研究[J]. 中国法学, 2004(1): 173.
[3] 赵骏, 刘芸. 国际投资仲裁透明度改革及我国的应对[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2014(3): 150-163.
[4] 刘璐. 论国际投资仲裁中法庭之友的参与[J]. 经贸法律评论, 2021(3): 86-102.
[5] 张庆麟. 国际投资仲裁的第三方参与问题探究[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2014(11): 70-82.
[6] 陈剑玲. 国际投资仲裁中的“法庭之友”参与问题研究[J]. 暨南学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012(7): 27-32.
[7] 黄世席. 国际投资争端中投资规则与人权规则适用的冲突与挑战[J]. 当代法学, 2018(4): 131.
[8] Choudhury, B. (2008) Recapturing Public Power: Is Investment Arbitration’s Engagement of the Public Inter-est Contributing to the Democratic Deficit. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 41, 44.
[9] 周园. 国际投资仲裁中法庭之友制度的新发展[J]. 东方法学, 2015(4): 90-98.
[10] 刘京莲. 法庭之友参与国际投资仲裁体制研究[J]. 太平洋学报, 2008(5): 6-17.
[11] 杨玲. 境外仲裁费用面面观[N]. 法治日报, 2021-06-24.