论民事司法鉴定中法官职责
On the Duties of Judges in Civil Forensic Appraisals
摘要: 司法鉴定程序得出的鉴定意见会对裁判结果产生直接影响。法官最终决定鉴定程序的启动并对鉴定意见的证据能力和证明力进行审查,确定是否以及何种程度上将其作为定案根据。在鉴定启动程序中,法官应保障当事人的鉴定启动权,并通过释明的方式帮助当事人正确启动鉴定程序,在依职权启动鉴定程序时可以考虑保护弱势方利益之目的。鉴定程序结束后,法官应对鉴定意见进行实质性审查,通过当事人对鉴定意见的异议以及质证明确鉴定争议焦点,并审慎启动重新鉴定程序。
Abstract: The appraisal opinions obtained by the forensic evaluation procedure will have a direct impact on the results of the adjudication. The judge ultimately decides on the initiation of the appraisal pro-cedure and examines the evidentiary capacity and probative power of the appraisal opinion to de-termine whether and to what extent it is used as the basis for the determination. In the appraisal initiation procedure, the judge shall safeguard the parties’ right to initiate the appraisal, and help the parties to correctly initiate the appraisal procedure through the means of explanation, and may consider the purpose of protecting the interests of the weak party when initiating the appraisal procedure ex officio. After the appraisal procedure is completed, the judge shall conduct a substan-tive review of the appraisal opinion, clarify the focus of the appraisal dispute through the parties’ objections to the appraisal opinion and cross-examination of evidence, and prudently initiate the re-appraisal procedure.
文章引用:张昕. 论民事司法鉴定中法官职责[J]. 争议解决, 2022, 8(4): 830-836. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2022.84112

参考文献

[1] 陈如超. 民事司法鉴定中的法官行为规制[J]. 法商研究, 2018, 35(2):124-137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 陈如超. 新《民事证据规定》对法官权责的制度改造——基于司法鉴定的视角[J]. 证据科学, 2020, 28(2): 179-191.
[3] 汪建成. 司法鉴定基础理论研究[J]. 法学家, 2009(4):1-27+157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 曹志勋. 对当事人鉴定申请的司法审查——兼论书证真伪鉴定的特殊性[J]. 法学, 2020(12): 112-129.
[5] 曹志勋. 民事鉴定程序启动中的职权与权利配置[J]. 当代法学, 2021, 35(2): 134-146.
[6] 宫雪. 比较法视野下鉴定启动权对诉权的保障——兼论新《民事诉讼法》第七十六条[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2013(1): 102-108.
[7] 苏青. 鉴定意见证据规则研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社. 2016: 72.
[8] 任重. 我国新诉讼资料释明的反思与重构——以《九民会议纪要》与《新证据规定》为中心的解读[J]. 当代法学, 2020, 34(5): 122-135.
[9] 郭华. 民事诉讼证据中有关鉴定的诠释与规则适用探讨[J]. 证据科学, 2020, 28(2): 159-171.
[10] 彭峰. “越位”的专家与“隐身”的法官——专家参与在司法过程中的合理定位[J]. 法学评论, 2015, 33(4): 163-167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] 李学军. 诉讼中专门性问题的解决之道——兼论我国鉴定制度和法定证据形式的完善[J]. 政法论坛, 2020, 38(6): 37-54.
[12] 季美君. 专家证据的价值与我国司法鉴定制度的修改[J]. 法学研究, 2013, 35(2): 151-172.
[13] 王元凤, 曲子函. 论民事诉讼中重新鉴定乱象的治理——以《民事诉讼证据规定》(2019版)为契机[J]. 证据科学, 2020, 28(2): 206-217.