颅底凹陷寰枢椎脱位不同材料关节间融合器力学性能的有限元分析
Finite Element Analysis of the Mechanical Properties of Different Materials of Inter-Articular Cage for Basilar Invagination with Atlantoaxial Dislocation
DOI: 10.12677/MOS.2022.116139, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 薛雅茹, 赵改平*, 宋 梅, 李富超, 夏小淇, 刘亚琪:上海理工大学健康科学与工程学院,上海;马 童:同济大学医学院附属杨浦医院骨科,上海;段婉茹, 陈 赞:首都医科大学宣武医院神经外科,北京
关键词: 颅底凹陷寰枢椎脱位关节间融合器力学性能后路内固定技术有限元分析Basilar Invagination with Atlantoaxial Dislocation Inter-Articular Cage Mechanical Properties Posterior Internal Fixation Technique Finite Element Analysis
摘要: 目的:研究颅底凹陷寰枢椎脱位(Basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation, BI-AAD)后路内固定治疗技术中不同材料寰枢椎关节间融合器对颈椎生物力学性能的影响。方法:根据BI-AAD患者寰枢椎侧方关节形态结构,结合临床后路内固定手术方案,建立枕骨–上颈椎植入寰枢椎关节间融合器结合悬臂复位技术的三维有限元模型,分析Ti/PEEK和Ti两种材料的寰枢椎关节间融合器对颈椎寰枢关节稳定性的影响、关节间融合器和C2终板的应力分布特征。结果:Ti/PEEK和纯Ti材料的寰枢椎关节间融合器结合悬臂复位技术治疗BI-AAD后,颈椎在前屈、后伸、侧弯和旋转工况下寰枢椎关节活动度(Range of motion, ROM)较BI-AAD病变模型分别降低了98.76%、97.36%、97.74%、97.97%和99.2%、97.74%、97.74%、98.07%;C2终板、关节间融合器上下撑开壳体和内支撑环的应力峰值均呈现Ti/PEEK材料最低,壳体断裂风险相对较小。结论:Ti/PEEK和纯Ti材料的寰枢椎关节间融合器均可提供BI-AAD手术后椎体的稳定性,Ti/PEEK材料关节间融合器整体结构的应力较小,使沉降风险降低,更为安全可行。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effect of different materials of atlantoaxial inter-articular cage on the biomechanical properties of the cervical spine in the posterior internal fixation technique of basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation (BI-AAD). Methods: Based on the morphological struc- ture of the lateral atlantoaxial joint of BI-AAD patients, a three-dimensional finite element model of occipital-superior cervical implantation of atlantoaxial inter-articular cage combined with cantilever repositioning technique was established, and the effects of Ti/PEEK and Ti inter-articular cage on the stability of the cervical atlantoaxial joint and the stress distribution characteristics of the inter-articular cage and C2 endplate were analyzed. Results: After the treatment of BI-AAD with Ti/PEEK and pure Ti inter-articular cage combined with cantilever repositioning technique, the range of motion (ROM) of the atlantoaxial joint in forward flexion, back extension, lateral bending and rotation in the cervical spine was reduced by 98.76%, 97.36%, 97.74%, 97.97% and 98.07%, respectively, compared with the BI-AAD lesion model. 99.2%, 97.74%, 97.74%, 98.07%; the peak stresses of the C2 endplate, the upper and lower braced shells of the inter-articular cage and the internal support ring showed the lowest Ti/PEEK material, and the risk of shell fracture was relatively small. Conclusions: Both Ti/PEEK and pure Ti inter-articular cage in the atlantoaxial spine provide stability of the vertebral body after BI-AAD surgery. The overall structure of the Ti/PEEK inter-articular cage is less stressed, making the risk of subsidence lower and safer and more feasible.
文章引用:薛雅茹, 赵改平, 宋梅, 李富超, 夏小淇, 马童, 段婉茹, 陈赞, 刘亚琪. 颅底凹陷寰枢椎脱位不同材料关节间融合器力学性能的有限元分析[J]. 建模与仿真, 2022, 11(6): 1477-1486. https://doi.org/10.12677/MOS.2022.116139

参考文献

[1] Bo, X., Wang, W., Chen, Z., et al. (2016) Compression-Distraction Reduction Surgical Verification and Optimization to Treat the Basilar Invagination and Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Finite Element Analysis. Biomedical Engineering Online, 15, 383-397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] 段婉茹, 刘振磊, 关键, 等. 应用宣武枕颈复位内固定系统一期后路手术治疗颅底凹陷寰枢椎脱位临床报告[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2019, 57(10): 782-787.
[3] 张童童, 董恩纯, 郑纪豹, 等. 3D 打印高度可调聚醚醚酮颈椎椎间融合器的优化设计与评价[J]. 医用生物力学, 2021, 36(2): 177-183.
[4] 张泓, 吴爱悯, 李俊伟, 等. 侧前方入路一体式可撑开可复位椎间融合器的生物力学特征[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2023, 27(13): 1975.
[5] Lin, G.X., Kim, J.S., Kotheeranurak, V., et al. (2022) Does the Application of Expandable Cages in TLIF Provide Improved Clinical and Radiological Results Compared to Static Cages? A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Surgery, 9, Article ID: 949938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Chang, C.C., Chou, D., Pennicooke, B., et al. (2020) Long-Term Radiographic Outcomes of Expandable versus Static Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 34, 471-480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Gabriel, J.P., Muzumdar, A.M., Khalil, S., et al. (2011) A Novel Crossed Rod Configuration Incorporating Translaminar Screws for Occipitocervical Internal Fixation: An in Vitro Biomechanical Study. The Spine Journal, 11, 30-35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Ma, X.X., Peng, X.B., Xiang, H.F., et al. (2014) A Finite Element Modeling of Posterior Atlantoaxial Fixation and Biomechanical Analysis of C2 Intralaminar Screw Fixation. Chinese Medical Journal-Peking, 127, 1266-1271.
[9] Liu, H.B., Zhang, B.C., Lei, J.Y., et al. (2016) Biomechanical Role of the C1 Lateral Mass Screws in Occipitoatlantoaxial Fixation: A Finite Element Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 41, E1312-E1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Wang, H., Ma, L., Yin, Y., et al. (2019) Biomechanical Rationale for the Development of Atlantoaxial Instability and Basilar Invagination in Patients with Occipitalization of the Atlas: A Finite Element Analysis. World Neurosurgery, 127, e474-e479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Bo, X., Wang, W., Chen, Z.A.N., et al. (2020) Research on the Strategy of Reduction Operation of Basilar Invagination Combined with Atlantoaxial Dislocation. Journal of Mechanics in Medicine and Biology, 20, Article ID: 2050028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Goel, A. (2004) Treatment of Basilar Invagination by Atlantoaxial Joint Distraction and Direct Lateral Mass Fixation. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 1, 281-286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Yoshizumi, T., Murata, H., Ikenishi, Y., et al. (2014) Occipitocervical Fusion with Relief of Odontoid Invagination: Atlantoaxial Distraction Method Using Cylindrical Titanium Cage for Basilar Invagination—Case Report. Neurosurgical Review, 37, 519-525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Patkar, S. (2016) Anterior Facetal Realignment and Distraction for Atlanto-Axial Subluxation with Basilar Invagination …. A Technical Note. Neurological Research, 38, 748-750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Lee, J.Y., Im, S.B. and Jeong, J.H. (2017) Use of a C1-C2 Facet Spacer to Treat Atlantoaxial Instability and Basilar Invagination Associated with Rheumatoid Arthritis. World Neurosurgery, 98, 874.E813-874.E816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Zhang, B., Liu, H., Cai, X., et al. (2015) Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Transoral Atlantoaxial Anchored Cage with Established Fixation Technique—A Finite Element Analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 16, Article No. 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Lee, S.H., Im, Y.J., Kim, K.T., et al. (2011) Comparison of Cervical Spine Biomechanics after Fixed- and Mobile-Core Artificial Disc Replacement: A Finite Element Analysis. Spine, 36, 700-708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] Kashii, M., Kitaguchi, K., Makino, T., et al. (2020) Comparison in the Same Intervertebral Space between Titanium-Coated and Uncoated PEEK Cages in Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery. Journal of Orthopaedic Science, 25, 565-570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Yao, Y.C., Chou, P.H., Lin, H.H., et al. (2021) Outcome of Ti/PEEK versus PEEK Cages in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Global Spine Journal. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 赵齐通, 靳林煜, 李新锋. 不同单节段颈椎前路椎间融合系统对邻近节段的生物力学影响[J]. 医用生物力学, 2018, 33(3): 212-217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Barsa, P. and Suchomel, P. (2007) Factors Affecting Sagittal Malalignment Due to Cage Subsidence in Standalone Cage assisted Anterior Cervical Fusion. European Spine Journal, 16, 1395-1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Kim, I.S., Hong, J.T. and Sung, J.H. (2011) Vertical Reduction Using Atlantoaxial Facet Spacer in Basilar Invagination with Atlantoaxial Instability. The Korean Neurosurgical Society, 50, 528-531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]