比较AMH和bFSH对卵巢功能的反映和辅助生殖结局预测价值的研究进展
To Compare the Research Progress of AMH and bFSH in the Reflection of Ovarian Function and the Predictive Value of Assisted Reproductive Outcomes
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2022.12111448, PDF,   
作者: 刘 刚:青海大学,青海 西宁;曾湘晖*:青海省人民医院,青海 西宁
关键词: 抗缪勒管激素卵泡刺激素辅助生殖技术Anti-Mullerian Hormone Follicle Stimulating Hormone Assisted Reproductive Technology
摘要: 随着辅助生殖技术(ART)的发展,越来越多的技术难题被一一攻克。为提高ART治疗结局,需要个体化评价卵巢功能,为不孕症患者选择合适的促排卵方案。因此本文通过比较AMH和FSH数值对卵巢储备功能的反映,对卵巢低反应的诊断,且研究两者对POR患者ART助孕结局的预测价值,为临床诊治提供科学依据。
Abstract: With the development of assisted reproductive technology (ART), more and more technical prob-lems have been overcome. In order to improve the outcome of ART treatment, it is necessary to in-dividually evaluate ovarian function and select an appropriate ovulation induction program for in-fertile patients. Therefore, this paper compared the reflection of AMH and FSH values on ovarian reserve function and the diagnosis of low ovarian response, and studied the predictive value of AMH and FSH values on the outcome of ART assisted pregnancy in POR patients, to provide scientific ba-sis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
文章引用:刘刚, 曾湘晖. 比较AMH和bFSH对卵巢功能的反映和辅助生殖结局预测价值的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2022, 12(11): 10040-10045. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2022.12111448

参考文献

[1] 徐潇雨, 王树玉, 张巧利, 余兰, 刘艳君, 周丽颖, 马延敏, 贾婵维. IVF-ET中不同促排卵方案的临床研究[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2019, 27(6): 758-760.
[2] Siddiqui, Q.U.A., Anjum, S., Zahra, F. and Yousuf, S.M. (2019) Ovarian Reserve Parameters and Response to Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Infertile Patients. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 35, 958-962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] 周洪梅, 董金菊, 马梦玲. AMH联合E_2、FSH/LH检测对不孕症患者卵巢储备功能及反应性的评估作用[J]. 中国性科学, 2020, 29(8): 71-75.
[4] 古芳, 徐艳文. 博洛尼亚标准——卵巢反应不良共识的解读[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2015, 31(8): 699-702.
[5] Wolff, E. and Taylor, H. (2004) Value of the Day 3 Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Measurement. Fertility and Sterility, 81, 1486-1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Kwee, J., Schats, R., McDonnell, J., Lambalk, C.B. and Schoemaker, J. (2004) Intercycle Variability of Ovarian Reserve Tests: Results of a Prospective Randomized Study. Human Reproduction, 19, 590-595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Broekmans, F., Kwee, J., Hendriks, D., Mol, B. and Lambalk, C. (2006) A Systematic Review of Tests Predicting Ovarian Reserve and IVF Outcome. Human Reproduction Update, 12, 685-718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Nelson, S. anderson, R., Broekmans, F., Raine-Fenning, N., Fleming, R. and laMarca, A. (2012) Anti-Mullerian Hormone: Clairvoyance or Crystal Clear? Human Reproduction, 27, 631-636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Durlinger, A.L.L., Visser, J.A. and Themmen, A.P.N. (2002) Regula-tion of Ovarian Function: The Role of Anti-Mullerian Hormone. Reproduction, 124, 601-609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Nelson, S. (2013) Biomarkers of Ovarian Response: Current and Fu-ture Applications. Fertility and Sterility, 99, 963-969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Li, H.W.R., Lee, V.C.Y., Lau, E.Y.L., Yeung, W.S.B., Ho, P.C. and Ng, E.H.Y. (2014) Ovarian Response and Cumulative Live Birth Rate of Women Undergoing In-Vitro Fertili-sation Who Had Discordant Anti-Mullerian Hormone and Antral Follicle Count Measurements: A Retrospective Study. PLOS ONE, 9, e108493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Nelson, S.M., Yates, R.W. and Fleming, R. (2007) Serum An-ti-Mullerian Hormone and FSH: Prediction of Live Birth and Extremes of Response in Stimulated Cycles—Implications for Individualization of Therapy. Human Reproduction, 22, 2414-2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Singer, T., Barad, D.H., Weghofer, A. and Gleicher, N. (2009) Cor-relation of Antimullerian Hormone and Baseline Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Levels. Fertility and Sterility, 91, 2616-2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Hussain, M., Cahill, D., Akande, V. and Gordon, U. (2013) Discrepancies between Anti Mullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction. Obstetrics and Gynecology International, 2013, Article ID: 383278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Amer Abed, F., Ezzat Maroof, R. and Al-Nakkash, U.M.A. (2019) Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Anti- Müllerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Detecting Prema-ture Ovarian Failure in Iraqi Women by ROC Analysis. Reports of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2, 126-131.
[16] Alipour, F., Rasekhjahromi, A., Maalhagh, M., Sobhanian, S. and Hosseinpoor, M. (2015) Comparison of Specificity and Sensitivity of AMH and FSH in Diagnosis of Premature Ovarian Failure. Disease Markers, 2015, Ar-ticle ID: 585604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] 谭嘉琦, 陈晓莉, 李予, 张清学, 王文军, 杨冬梓. 抗苗勒管激素预测卵巢反应性的价值研究[J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2015, 31(8): 583-587.
[18] Ligon, S., Lustik, M., Levy, G., et al. (2019) Low Antimüllerian Hormone (AMH) Is Associated with Decreased Live Birth after in Vitro Fertilization When Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and AMH Are Discordant. Fertility and Sterility, 1, 73-81.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Li, F., Lu, R., Zeng, C., Li, X. and Xue, Q. (2021) Develop-ment and Validation of a Clinical Pregnancy Failure Prediction Model for Poor Ovarian Responders during IVF/ICSI. Frontiers in Endocrinology (Lausanne), 12, Article ID: 717288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 张亚楠. 卵巢储备功能评价指标对生育力低下女性助孕结局的预测价值研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 北京: 中国疾病预防控制中心, 2020.[CrossRef
[21] Mutlu, M.F., Erdem, M., Erdem, A., Yildiz, S., Mutlu, I., Arisoy, O., et al. (2013) Antral Follicle Count Determines Poor Ovarian Response Better than Anti-Müllerian Hormone but Age Is the Only Predictor for Live Birth in in Vitro Fertilization Cycles. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Ge-netics, 30, 657-665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[22] Faddy, M.J., Gosden, R.G., Gougeon, A., Richardson, S.J. and Nelson, J.F. (1992) Accelerated Disappearance of Ovarian Follicles in Mid-Life: Implications for Forecasting Menopause. Human Reproduction, 7, 1342-1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Hsieh, H.C., Su, J.Y., Wang, S. and Huang, Y.T. (2020) Age Effect on in Vitro Fertilization Pregnancy Mediated by Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) and Modified by Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 20, Article No. 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Nardo, L.G., Gelbaya, T.A., Wilkinson, H., Roberts, S.A., Yates, A., Pemberton, P., et al. (2009) Circulating Basal Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels as Predictor of Ovarian Response in Women Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization. Fertility and Sterility, 92, 1586- 1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[25] Te Velde, E.R. and Pearson, P.L. (2002) The Variability of Female Reproductive Ageing. Human Reproduction Update, 8, 141-154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Shahrokh Tehraninezhad, E., Mehrabi, F., Taati, R., Kalantar, V., Aziminekoo, E. and Tarafdari, A. (2016) Analysis of Ovarian Reserve Markers (AMH, FSH, AFC) in Different Age Strata in IVF/ICSI Patients. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine, 14, 501-506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef