计算流体力学评估颅内动脉瘤破裂风险的意义及进展
Implications and Advances in Computational Fluid Dynamics for Assessing the Risk of Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2022.12111457, PDF,   
作者: 李 唐*:广西医科大学第一附属医院神经外科,广西 南宁;阳 君, 邓文娟:广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院医学影像中心,广西 南宁
关键词: 颅内动脉瘤破裂风险计算流体力学血流动力学Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Risk Computational Fluid Dynamics Hemodynamics
摘要: 颅内动脉瘤是严重危害人类健康,甚至危及生命的脑血管病变,其高致死致残率一直以来备受关注。而计算流体力学(Computational Fluid Dynamics, CFD)可以定量分析颅内动脉瘤的血流动力学,可用于研究颅内动脉瘤的发生、发展以及破裂机制,但将CFD用于评估颅内动脉瘤破裂风险仍存争议。本文旨在综述近年来计算流体力学在评估颅内动脉瘤破裂风险方面的意义和作用。
Abstract: Intracranial aneurysm is a cerebrovascular lesion that seriously endangers human health and even endangers life, and its high lethality and disability rate has been of great concern. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can quantify the hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms and can be used to study the occurrence, development and rupture mechanisms of intracranial aneurysms, but the use of CFD to assess the risk of intracranial aneurysm rupture is still controversial. The purpose of this article is to review the significance and role of computational fluid dynamics in assessing the risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms in recent years.
文章引用:李唐, 阳君, 邓文娟. 计算流体力学评估颅内动脉瘤破裂风险的意义及进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2022, 12(11): 10106-10111. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2022.12111457

参考文献

[1] Xiang, J., Tutino, V.M., Snyder, K.V., et al. (2014) CFD: Computational Fluid Dynamics or Confounding Factor Dis-semination? The Role of Hemodynamics in Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Risk Assessment. American Journal of Neu-roradiology, 35, 1849-1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Saqr, K.M., Rashad, S., Tupin, S., et al. (2020) What does Computational Fluid Dynamics Tell Us about Intracranial Aneurysms? A Meta-Analysis and Critical Review. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 40, 1021-1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Cebral, J.R., Mut, F., Weir, J., et al. (2011) Quantitative Charac-terization of the Hemodynamic Environment in Ruptured and Unruptured Brain Aneurysms. American Journal of Neu-roradiology, 32, 145-151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Xiang, J., Natarajan, S.K., Tremmel, M., et al. (2011) Hemodynam-ic-Morphologic Discriminants for Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture. Stroke, 42, 144-152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Russell, J.H., Kelson, N., Barry, M., et al. (2013) Com-putational Fluid Dynamic Analysis of Intracranial Aneurysmal Bleb Formation. Neurosurgery, 73, 1061-1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Murayama, Y., Fujimura, S., Suzuki, T., et al. (2019) Computational Fluid Dynamics as a Risk Assessment Tool for Aneurysm Rupture. Neurosurgical Focus, 47, E12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Skodvin, T.O., Evju, O., Helland, C.A., et al. (2018) Rupture Prediction of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Nationwide Matched Case-Control Study of Hemodynamics at the Time of Di-agnosis. Journal of Neurosurgery, 129, 854-860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Can, A. and Du, R. (2016) Association of Hemodynamic Factors with Intracranial Aneurysm Formation and Rupture: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neurosurgery, 78, 510-519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Xiang, J., Damiano, R.J., Lin, N., et al. (2015) High-Fidelity Virtual Stenting: Modeling of Flow Diverter Deployment for Hemodynamic Characterization of Complex Intracranial Aneurysms. Journal of Neurosurgery, 123, 832-840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Walcott, B.P., Reinshagen, C., Stapleton, C.J., et al. (2016) Pre-dictive Modeling and in Vivo Assessment of Cerebral Blood Flow in the Management of Complex Cerebral Aneurysms. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 36, 998-1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Valen-Sendstad, K., Piccinelli, M., Krishnankuttyrema, R., et al. (2015) Estimation of Inlet Flow Rates for Image-Based Aneurysm CFD Models: Where and How to Begin? Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 43, 1422-1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Jing, L., Fan, J., Wang, Y., et al. (2015) Morphologic and He-modynamic Analysis in the Patients with Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms: Ruptured versus Unruptured. PLOS ONE, 10, e0132494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] Baharoglu, M.I., Schirmer, C.M., Hoit, D.A., et al. (2010) An-eurysm Inflow-Angle as a Discriminant for Rupture in Sidewall Cerebral Aneurysms: Morphometric and Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis. Stroke, 41, 1423-1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Kono, K. and Terada, T. (2014) Treatment Strategy and Follow-Up Evaluation for an Unruptured Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysm Associated with Pseudo-Occlusion of the Internal Carotid Artery Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations. Turkish Neurosurgery, 24, Article No. 6.
[15] Omodaka, S., Sugiyama, S., Inoue, T., et al. (2012) Local Hemodynamics at the Rupture Point of Cerebral An-eurysms Determined by Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 34, 121-129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Fukazawa, K., Ishida, F., Umeda, Y., et al. (2015) Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis to Characterize Local Hemodynamic Features of Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm Rupture Points. World Neurosurgery, 83, 80-86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Xiang, J., Yu, J., Snyder, K.V., et al. (2016) Hemodynam-ic-Morphological Discriminant Models for Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture Remain Stable with Increasing Sample Size. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 8, 104-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Lu, G., Huang, L., Zhang, X.L., et al. (2011) Influence of Hemodynamic Factors on Rupture of Intracranial Aneurysms: Patient-Specific 3D Mirror Aneurysms Model Computa-tional Fluid Dynamics Simulation. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 32, 1255-1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Meng, H., Tutino, V.M., Xiang, J., et al. (2014) High WSS or Low WSS? Complex Interactions of Hemodynamics with Intracranial Aneurysm Initiation, Growth, and Rupture: Toward a Unifying Hypothesis. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 35, 1254-1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[20] Qian, Y., Takao, H., Umezu, M., et al. (2011) Risk Analysis of Unruptured Aneurysms Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Technology: Preliminary Results. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 32, 1948-1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Takao, H., Murayama, Y., Otsuka, S., et al. (2012) Hemodynamic Differ-ences between Unruptured and Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms during Observation. Stroke, 43, 1436-1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Kadasi, L.M., Dent, W.C. and Malek, A.M. (2013) Colo-calization of Thin-Walled Dome Regions with Low Hemodynamic Wall Shear Stress in Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms Clinical Article. Journal of Neurosurgery, 119, 172-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Suzuki, T., Takao, H., Suzuki, T., et al. (2017) Variability of He-modynamic Parameters Using the Common Viscosity Assumption in a Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of In-tracranial Aneurysms. Technology and Health Care, 25, 37-47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef