大沽河流域辇止头村水生态规划研究
Research on Water Ecological Planning of Nianzhitou Village in Dagu River Basin
摘要: 乡村水生态环境质量影响流经的河流水质,是保障河流水质需要解决的关键问题。利用ArcGIS空间分析功能,水文分析模块和最小耗费距离模型,分析了辇头村水生态环境质量的现状,得出了生态源斑块数量占比少,生态廊道不足,无法形成生态网,生态韧性差。生活污水和农田径流直接进入大沽河引发河流水质超标。依据生态连通性原理,规划了21条生态廊道,形成了村庄的生态网,增强了村域的生态韧性。对村庄生活污水进行集中处理和深度净化,在大沽河沿岸规划了宽度为100 m的缓冲带,减少农田径流污染,保障了河流水质。
Abstract: The quality of rural water ecological environment affects the water quality of the river nearby, which is the key problem to be solved to ensure the water quality of the river. ArcGIS spatial anal-ysis function, hydrological analysis module and minimum cost distance model were used to analyze the current situation of water ecological environment quality in the Qiantou Village. The results showed that the number of ecological source patches were small, ecological corridors were insufficient, ecological network could not be formed, and ecological resilience was poor. Domestic sewage and farm runoff directly enter the Dagu River, causing water quality to exceed standards. According to the principle of ecological connectivity, 21 ecological corridors are planned to form the ecological network of the village and enhance the ecological resilience of the village. Centralized treatment and deep purification of village domestic sewage have been carried out, and a buffer zone of 100 m width has been planned along the Dagu River to reduce runoff pollution from farmland and ensure the water quality of the river.
文章引用:孔祥榮, 仝闻一, 刘通, 刘洋, 张羽丰. 大沽河流域辇止头村水生态规划研究[J]. 世界生态学, 2022, 11(4): 417-425. https://doi.org/10.12677/IJE.2022.114050

参考文献

[1] Rao, J., Ji, X.T., Ouyang, W., Zhao, X.C. and Lai, X.H. (2012) Dilemma Analysis of China Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution Based on Peasants’ Household Surveys. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13, 2169-2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 黄为. 中小河流河道治理探析[J]. 东北水利水电, 2016(5): 64-65.
[3] Díaz, F.J., Ó’Geen, A.T. and Dahlgren, R.A. (2012) Agricultural Pollutant Removal by Constructed Wet-lands: Implications for Water Management and Design. Agricultural Water Management, 104, 171-183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Bhattarai, R., Kalita, P.K. and Patel, M.K. (2009) Nutrient Transport through a Vegetative Filter Strip with Subsurface Drainage. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1868-1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] 周广礼. 大沽河生态化治理对策的研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 青岛理工大学, 2014.
[6] 邹桂红. 基于Ann AGNPS模型的非点源污染研究——以大沽河典型小流域为例[D]: [博士学位论文]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2007.
[7] 李彬. 农村环境整治相关问题探讨[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2014(13): 122.
[8] 陈为, 朱小娇. 浅析我国南方农业面源污染现状与治理对策[J]. 中国资源综合利用, 2020, 38(4): 133-136.
[9] 李伟娜, 田建茹, 李亚男, 宁海丽, 李昊伦. 大沽河农业面源污染核算及防控对策[J]. 青岛职业技术学院学报, 2022, 35(2): 46-50.
[10] 于丽华. 大沽河莱西段水质污染现状调查及改善对策研究[J]. 山东化工, 2020, 49(15): 229-231.
[11] 孙贤斌, 刘红玉. 基于生态功能评价的湿地系统景观格局优化及其效应——以江苏盐城海滨湿地为例[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(5): 1157-1166.
[12] 刘杰, 叶晶, 杨婉. 基于GIS的滇池流域景观格局优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2012, 27(5): 801-808.
[13] 张远景, 俞滨洋. 城市生态网络空间评价及其格局优化[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(21): 6969-6984.
[14] 陈利顶, 傅伯杰, 赵文武. “源” “汇”景观理论及其生态学意义[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 1(5): 1444-1449.
[15] 邓文洪, 赵匠, 高玮. 破碎化次生林斑块面积及栖息地质量对繁殖鸟类群落结构的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(6): 1087-1094.
[16] 谢高地, 肖玉, 甄霖. 我国粮食生产的生态服务价值研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(3): 10-13.
[17] Fischer, R.A. (2001) Wild-Link, Connecting Fragmented Habitats with Ecological Corridors in Northern Michigan. Conservation Resource Alliance, Traverse City.
[18] 朱强, 俞孔坚, 李迪华. 景观规划中的生态廊道宽度[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(9): 2406-2412.
[19] 姚小琴, 窦华港. 天津河道廊道的生态修复[J]. 城市规划, 2009, 33(9B): 69.
[20] 中华人民共和国环境保护部. 关于加强农村环境保护工作的意见[Z]. 2007.
[21] Pinay, G. and Decamps, H. (1988) The Role of Riparian Woods in Regulating Nitrogen Fluxes between the Alluvial Aquifer and Surface Water: A Conceptual Model. River Research and Applications, 2, 507-516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Lena, B.M., Gilles, P. and Charles, R. (1995) Structure and Function of Buffer Strips from a Water Quality Perspective in Agriculture Landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 31, 323-331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef