一次高温事件的GRAPES对流尺度模式预报能力评估
Evaluation of the GRAPES Convective Scale Model Prediction Capability for a High Temperature Event
摘要: 为了评估GRAPES对流尺度模式对高温事件的预报能力,本文选取成都市及其周边区域(102˚E~105˚E, 30˚N~31.5˚N),7月28日至8月4日的GRAPES 3 km模式温度预报资料、ERA5温度再分析资料和成都市各测站常规资料中的温度资料,利用图像识别的特征区域提取算法提取出温度高于30℃的区域,通过计算相关系数等对此次成都市的高温事件进行GRAPES对流尺度模式高温事件预报能力评估。本文从四个方面进行讨论:高温事件的开始时间、结束时间、高温区域面积和高温强度。结果表明:1) GRAPES对流尺度模式预报高温区域中心变化趋势与ERA5再分析资料的高温区域中心变化趋势相一致,但GRAPES对流尺度模式对高温区域中心的预报与ERA5再分析资料相比整体偏北、偏西。2) GRAPES对流尺度模式对高温出现和结束的时段的预报与ERA5再分析资料高温出现和结束时间相比均有所提前,高温开始时间提前1~2小时,高温结束时间提前1~3小时。3) GRAPES对流尺度模式预报高温区域面积与ERA5再分析资料相比整体偏大,二者高温面积相关性较高,高温区域面积的预报能力较好。4) GRAPES对流尺度模式出现高温时段温度变化趋势与ERA5再分析资料相符合,GRAPES对流尺度模式对高温强度的预报与ERA5再分析资料的高温强度相比整体较弱。
Abstract: This paper selects the temperature data from the GRAPES 3 km model prediction of temperature data, the ERA5 reanalysis temperature data and the conventional data from Chengdu stations from July 28 to August 4 in Chengdu and its surrounding areas (102˚E~105˚E, 30˚N~31.5˚N), to evaluate the prediction ability of the GRAPES convective scale model for high temperature events. By using the feature area extraction algorithm of image recognition to extract the area with temperature higher than 30˚C, calculating the correlation coefficient to evaluate the capability of forecasting the high temperature event of the GRAPES convective scale model for this high temperature event in Chengdu. This paper discusses from four aspects: the start time, the end time, the area of high temperature region and the intensity of high temperature region of this high temperature event. Major results are as follows. 1) The prediction trend of the regional center of high temperature by the GRAPES convective scale model is consistent with that by ERA5 reanalysis data, but the prediction trend of the regional center of high temperature by the GRAPES convective scale model is generally more north and more west than that by ERA5 reanalysis data. 2) Compared with ERA5 reanalysis data, the prediction of the onset and end of high temperature by the GRAPES convective scale is earlier. The GRAPES convective scale model predicts that the onset of high temperature is 1~2 hours earlier and the end of high temperature is 1~3 hours earlier. 3) The GRAPES convective scale model has a high correlation with ERA5 reanalysis data, the prediction ability of high temperature area is better. 4) Compared with ERA5 reanalysis data, the GRAPES convective scale model predicted high temperature area is mainly larger than ERA5 reanalysis data. The correlation between the two models is high and the prediction ability of high temperature area is good.
文章引用:徐璇烨, 蔡宏珂. 一次高温事件的GRAPES对流尺度模式预报能力评估[J]. 自然科学, 2022, 10(6): 1034-1044. https://doi.org/10.12677/OJNS.2022.106116

参考文献

[1] Alexander, L.V., Zhang, X., et al. (2006) Global Observed Changes in Daily Climate Extremes of Temperature and Precipitation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111, D05109.
[2] Song, X., Zhang, Z., Chen, Y., et al. (2014) Spatiotemporal Changes of Global Extreme Temperature Events (ETEs) since 1981 and the Meteorological Causes. Natural Hazards, 70, 975-994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Coumou, D. and Rahmstorf, S. (2012) A Decade of Weather Extremes. Nature Climate Change, 2, 491-496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] 张书娟, 尹占娥, 温家洪, 等. 近60年我国华东地区高温灾害特征分析[J]. 上海师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 40(1): 95-101.
[5] Dole, R., Martin, H., et al. (2011) Was There a Basis for Anticipating the 2010 Russian Heat Wave? Geophysical Research Letters, 38, L06702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] IPCC (2013) Summary for Policymakers. In: Stocker, T.F., et al., Eds., Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 3-29.
[7] 吴统文, 宋连春, 刘向文, 等. 国家气候中心短期气候预测模式系统业务化进展[J]. 应用气象学报, 2013, 24(5): 533-543.
[8] 肖子牛. 我国短期气候监测预测业务进展[J], 气象, 2010, 36(7): 21-25.
[9] 鲍媛媛. 2006年6-8月T213与ECMWF模式中期预报性能检验[J]. 气象, 2006, 32(11): 98-104.
[10] 吴剑坤, 高丽, 乔林, 等. 基于T213集合预报的中国极端温度预报方法研究[J]. 气象科学, 2015, 35(4): 428-444.
[11] 郑嘉雯, 高丽, 任宏利, 等. 基于T639集合预报的我国2016年极端温度预报检验[J]. 气象, 2019, 45(4): 469-482.
[12] 陈法敬, 矫梅燕, 陈静. 一种温度集合预报产品释用方法的初步研究[J]. 气象, 2011, 37(1): 14-20.
[13] 夏凡, 陈静. 基于T213集合预报的极端天气预报指数及温度预报应用试验[J]. 气象, 2012, 38(12): 1492-1501.
[14] 康岚, 冯汉中, 屠妮妮, 等. GRAPES模式预报西南地区夏季2m温度的检验评估[J]. 高原山地气象研究, 2009, 29(2): 26-32.
[15] 任绪伟. GRAPES_Meso 3km模式及云分析系统在西北地区天气预报中的应用评估及水汽方案改进[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2021.
[16] 张利红, 何光碧. GRAPES_MESO模式对2011年夏季青藏高原东部及周边区域的预报检验[J]. 高原气象, 2014, 33(1): 14-35.
[17] 庄照荣, 薛纪善, 李兴良. GRAPES全球模式的模式误差估计[J]. 大气科学, 2010, 34(3): 591-598.
[18] 黄丽萍, 陈德辉, 邓莲堂, 等. GRAPES_MESO V4.0主要技术改进和预报效果检验[J]. 应用气象学报, 2017, 28(1): 25-37.