论采砂权出让合同在情势变更中的利益协调——以成都鹏伟实业有限公司采砂权纠纷案为视角
The Coordination of Interests of the Sand Mining Right Assignment Contract in Circumstance Change—From the Perspective of the Sand Mining Right Dispute Case of Chengdu Pengwei Industrial Co., Ltd.
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2022.1111653, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 周 旭:中国政法大学,民商经济法学院,北京
关键词: 采砂权出让合同情势变更利益协调鹏伟公司The Sand Mining Right Assignment Contract Circumstance Change Coordination of Interests Pengwei Company
摘要: 采砂权出让合同的履行涉及不同利益诉求的对立可能,在情势变更事由作用时冲突更易显现。结合鹏伟公司案的裁判实际,法院在应对这种利益纠纷时,存在缺乏公益之间、私益之间及彼此间的利益权衡原则与难以合理分担情势变更事由造成的损失等不足。以宏观视角分析,行为者应当明晰不同利益关系对立乃至冲突时的保障顺位,完善情势变更等情形下采砂权管理的法律规则,鼓励“中立”、“区分”与“裁量”取向为关键的裁判实践。
Abstract: The performance of the sand mining right assignment contract involves the possibility of the conflict of different interests, and the conflict is more likely to appear during circumstance change. Combined with the actual judgment of the Pengwei Company case, when the court dealt with such interest disputes, there were still shortcomings such as the lack of the principle of ba-lancing interests between public interests, between private interests and each other, and the difficulty of sharing losses caused by circumstance change. To this end, from a macro perspec-tive, actors should clarify the order of protection when different interests are opposed or even conflict, improve the legal rules for the management of sand mining rights in situations such as circumstance change, and encourage judgment concepts of “neutrality”, “discrimination” and “discretion”.
文章引用:周旭. 论采砂权出让合同在情势变更中的利益协调——以成都鹏伟实业有限公司采砂权纠纷案为视角[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2022, 11(11): 4792-4798. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2022.1111653

参考文献

[1] 王利明. 论行政协议的范围——兼评《关于审理行政协议案件若干问题的规定》第1条、第2条[J]. 环球法律评论, 2020, 42(1): 5-22.
[2] 刘燚. 论自然资源使用权出让协议在司法适用中的困境与解决路径[J]. 中国政法大学学报, 2020(1): 58-72+206.
[3] 何登辉. 双阶理论视阈下自然资源特许出让协议的应然定性[J]. 内蒙古社会科学(汉文版), 2017, 38(3): 92-99.
[4] 朱广新. 论“以合法形式掩盖非法目的”的法律行为[J]. 比较法研究, 2016(4): 162-178.
[5] 杨锐. 采矿权转让阴阳合同效力的司法认定[J]. 人民司法(应用), 2018(4): 44-47.
[6] 邱波, 杨庆堂. 情势变更规则下重新协商的困境与出路——以《民法典》第533条之适用为视角[J]. 山东法官培训学院学报, 2021, 37(1): 44-55.
[7] 张素华, 宁园. 论情势变更原则中的再交涉权利[J]. 清华法学, 2019, 13(3): 144-157.
[8] 王利明. 情事变更制度若干问题探讨——兼评《民法典合同编(草案)》(二审稿)第323条[J]. 法商研究, 2019, 36(3): 3-10.
[9] 谢鸿飞. 民法典合同编总则的立法技术与制度安排[J]. 河南社会科学, 2017, 25(6): 28-36+52.
[10] 徐冰. 情势变更原则的具体化构建——规范审判权行使视角下《民法典》第533条的准确适用[J]. 法律适用, 2022(2): 94-105.
[11] Lautpacht, H. (1947) Recognition in International Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[12] [英]亚当∙斯密, 著. 国民财富的性质和原因的研究(上卷) [M]. 郭大力, 王亚南, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1996: 14.
[13] [美]波斯纳, 著. 法理学问题[M]. 苏力, 译. 北京: 中国政法大学出版社, 2002: 442, 476.
[14] 梁根林. 防卫过当不法判断的立场、标准与逻辑[J]. 法学, 2019(2): 3-25.
[15] 省法院研究室. 江西高院发布2021年度全省法院贯彻实施民法典十大典型案例[EB/OL]. https://jxfy.chinacourt.gov.cn/article/detail/2022/01/id/6476558.shtml, 2020-01-10.