我国商标侵权惩罚性赔偿制度的适用及完善
Application and Improvement of Punitive Damages for Trademark Infringement in China
摘要: 商标侵权惩罚性赔偿制度在我国已经实施了八年多,商标侵权案件日渐增加,案件复杂程度也不断增加,与之相反的是,惩罚性赔偿的使用率很低,并未真正发挥出该制度的作用。如何唤醒“沉睡”的惩罚性赔偿制度,让其回归正轨,发挥其打击商标侵权行为、优化市场营商环境的作用,需要从司法适用的难点出发,把握好“恶意”与“情节严重”的内涵,运用科学的计算方法进行赔偿数额的计算,同时厘清商标侵权中惩罚性赔偿与法定赔偿的界限,避免泛化适用惩罚性赔偿。
Abstract:
The punitive damages system for trademark infringement has been implemented in China for more than eight years, and the number of trademark infringement cases has been increasing, and the complexity of the cases has also been increasing. On the contrary, the usage rate of punitive dam-ages is low, and the system has not really played its role. How to wake up the “sleeping” punitive damages system, bring it back to the right track, play its role in combating trademark infringement and optimizing the market business environment, it is necessary to start from the difficulties of ju-dicial application, grasp the connotation of “malice” and “circumstances serious”, apply scientific calculation methods to calculate the amount of compensation, and at the same time clarify the boundary between punitive damages and statutory damages in trademark infringement, so as to avoid the generalized application of punitive damages.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张茗莉. 商标侵权惩罚性赔偿制度司法适用的完善路径——兼评“MOTR”案与“喜茶”案[J]. 西南知识产权评论, 2021(1): 166-185.
|
|
[2]
|
平衡身体公司诉永康一恋运动器材有限公司侵权商标权纠纷案, 上海市浦东新区人民法院(2018)沪0115民初53351号民事判决书[Z].
|
|
[3]
|
斐乐体育有限公司诉浙江中远鞋业有限公司等侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷案, 北京知识产权法院(2017)京73民终1991号民事判决书[Z].
|
|
[4]
|
马忠法, 谢迪扬. 专利法中的惩罚性赔偿问题研究——以《专利法修正案(草案)》第72条的适用为视角[J]. 武陵学刊, 2020, 45(2): 46-56.
|
|
[5]
|
李明德. 关于知识产权损害赔偿的几点思考[J]. 知识产权, 2016(5): 3-9.
|
|
[6]
|
钱玉文, 李安琪. 论商标法中惩罚性赔偿制度的适用——以《商标法》第63条为中心[J]. 知识产权, 2016(9): 60-65.
|