流动人口社会融入的土地因素影响途径研究
Study on the Ways of Land Factors Affecting the Social Integration of Floating Population
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2022.1111824, PDF,   
作者: 李远哲:上海工程技术大学管理学院,上海
关键词: 土地流动人口社会融入Land Floating Population Social Integration
摘要: 2014年中国流动人口达2.53亿人次,自此中国流动人口数量逐年减少,流动人口减少意味着两种趋势,即流动人口返回户籍地或加入当地户口融入当地生活。论文围绕流动人口的宅基地使用权与承包地经营权的持有情况以及流动人口的社会融入意愿展开研究。在社会行为理论下,在2017全国流动人口动态监测调查数据(CMDS)的基础上,运用多分类有序回归模型对土地因素是否影响流动人口社会融入意愿展开研究。结果表明,婚姻、承包地经营对于流动人口融入意愿存在显著正面影响,农村户籍存在负面影响。宅基地与承包地同时考量时,宅基地使用权的持有对于流动人口的社会融入意愿存在负面影响。代际比较发现40~50岁的流动人口相较于60~70岁的流动人口受土地因素影响更显著。
Abstract: In 2014, China’s floating population reached 253 million person times. Since then, the number of China’s floating population has decreased year by year. The decrease of floating population means two trends, namely, the floating population returns to the registered residence or joins the local residence to integrate into the local life. This paper focuses on the ownership of the right to use the homestead and the right to manage contracted land of the floating population, as well as the will-ingness of the floating population to integrate into society. Under the social behavior theory, on the basis of the 2017 National Mobile Population Dynamic Monitoring Survey (CMDS) data, the multi category ordered regression model is used to study whether land factors affect the social integra-tion willingness of the migrant population. The results show that marriage and contracted land management have a significant positive impact on migrant population’s willingness to integrate, while rural registered residence has a negative impact. When homestead and contracted land are considered at the same time, the holding of homestead use right has a negative impact on the social integration willingness of the floating population. The intergenerational comparison shows that the floating population aged 40~50 is more significantly affected by land factors than the floating pop-ulation aged 60~70.
文章引用:李远哲. 流动人口社会融入的土地因素影响途径研究[J]. 应用数学进展, 2022, 11(11): 7803-7812. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2022.1111824

参考文献

[1] 陈成文, 孙嘉悦. 社会融入: 一个概念的社会学意义[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2012, 41(6): 66-71.
[2] 杨菊华. 中国流动人口的社会融入研究[J]. 中国社会科学, 2015(2): 61-79+203-204.
[3] 刘建娥. 农民工融入城市的影响因素及对策分析——基于五大城市调查的实证研究[J]. 云南大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 10(4): 64-71+96.
[4] 李怀. 集体地权整合、农村经济发展与乡村治理现代化[J]. 新视野, 2021(2): 85-91.
[5] 费孝通. 乡土中国[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2019.
[6] 刘银妹. 流动耕作农户的社会融入问题研究[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 37(6): 118-123.
[7] 杨菊华, 贺丹. 分异与融通: 欧美移民社会融合理论及对中国的启示[J]. 江苏行政学院学报, 2017(5): 72-80.
[8] 邓群钊, 石俊, 喻登科. 户籍制度背景下的社会资本结构与城乡收入差距[J/OL]. 管理评论: 1-13, 2021-05-09.
[9] 张五常. 佃农理论[M]. 上海: 商务印书馆, 2002.
[10] 李宁, 何文剑, 仇童伟, 陈利根. 农地产权结构、生产要素效率与农业绩效[J]. 管理世界, 2017(3): 44-62.
[11] 徐惠孝, 刘艳军. 收缩城市建设用地利用效率时空分异及影响机制——以黑龙江省伊春市为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(6): 937-947.
[12] 张栋, 李德平, 周亮, 等. 高精度住房空置率的地理空间影响因素定量研究[J]. 测绘通报, 2022(2): 100-105.