资本逻辑的“反生态性”及其生态文明道路选择
The “Anti Ecology” of Capital Logic and the Choice of the Road to Ecological Civilization
DOI: 10.12677/ACPP.2022.116275, PDF,   
作者: 杨宇轩:南京林业大学马克思主义学院,江苏 南京
关键词: 全球化资本逻辑生态危机生态文明Globalization Capital Logic Ecological Crisis Ecological Civilization
摘要: 当今世界生态环境问题日益凸显,在资本主义的运行体系中,生态危机是其必然出现的产物。资本逻辑的本质就是不断追求资本的增殖,产生生态危机的原因就是资本从生产资料私人占有这一理路出发,将人类共有的自然环境资源视作为其私人生产过程中可以独占的具有排他性的对象。资本生产方式的私有性质和自然资源的公有属性之间具有对抗性的矛盾,导致了人与自然之间的关系也变为对立关系。资本的无限增殖属性,必然导致自然资源被不加限制的掠夺和破坏,生态危机的出现成为了资本逻辑发展的必然。在资本逻辑的不断推动下,生态危机在全球范围内出现,并由此催生了生态帝国主义等形形色色的问题,只有用生态文明的逻辑对资本的生产方式加以限制,引导和变革,才能最终超越资本逻辑,达成人与自然的“和解”。
Abstract: Nowadays, the world ecological and environmental problems are increasingly prominent. In the operating system of capitalism, the ecological crisis is an inevitable product. The essence of capital logic is to constantly pursue the proliferation of capital. The reason for ecological crisis is that capital starts from the principle of private possession of means of production, and regards the natural environmental resources shared by human beings as exclusive objects that can be monopolized in the process of private production. The antagonistic contradiction between the private nature of capital production mode and the public nature of natural resources has led to the relationship between man and nature becoming antagonistic. The unlimited proliferation of capital will inevitably lead to the unlimited plundering and destruction of natural resources. The emergence of ecological crisis has become the inevitable development of capital logic. Under the constant promotion of capital logic, ecological crisis has emerged in the global scope, which has given birth to various problems such as ecological imperialism. Only by using the logic of ecological civilization to limit, guide and change the mode of production of capital, can we finally transcend the logic of capital and achieve “reconciliation” between man and nature.
文章引用:杨宇轩. 资本逻辑的“反生态性”及其生态文明道路选择[J]. 哲学进展, 2022, 11(6): 1610-1617. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACPP.2022.116275

参考文献

[1] 赵睿夫, 董海军. 布兰德生态资本主义批判理论及当代启示[J]. 北京社会科学, 2022(3): 4-13.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] 马克思, 恩格斯. 《马克思恩格斯全集》第46卷(上) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1979: 391.
[3] 马克思, 恩格斯. 《马克思恩格斯选集》第1卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1995: 275-276.
[4] 洪大用. 环境公平: 环境问题的社会学视点[J]. 浙江学刊, 2001(4): 67-73.
[5] 马克思, 恩格斯. 《马克思恩格斯全集》第42卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1979: 167.
[6] 马克思, 恩格斯. 《马克思恩格斯选集》第3卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1995: 374-375.
[7] 马克思. 1844年经济学哲学手稿[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2014: 52.
[8] 马克思, 恩格斯. 《马克思恩格斯全集》第30卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1995: 389-390.
[9] Foster, J.B. (2002) Ecology against Capitalism. Monthly Review Press, New York, 88.
[10] 马克思, 恩格斯. 《马克思恩格斯全集》第30卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1995: 227.
[11] 马克思. 《资本论》第一卷(下) [M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1975: 275.
[12] 马克思, 恩格斯. 《马克思恩格斯文集》第7卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 278.
[13] 黄娟, 张涛. 生态文明视域下的我国绿色生产方式初探[J]. 湖湘论坛, 2015, 28(4): 77-82.
[14] 马克思, 恩格斯. 《马克思恩格斯文集》第七卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2009: 928.
[15] 马克思, 恩格斯. 《马克思恩格斯选集》第1卷[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 1995: 346.