论老子的“损”与“益”
On Laozi’s “Reduction” and “Increase”
DOI: 10.12677/ACPP.2022.116278, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 李锡林:江苏师范大学哲学范式研究院,江苏 徐州
关键词: 为学为道无为有为reduction increase Harmony learning practice of Tao inaction action
摘要: 老子言“损”与“益”,从道与天道的形而上基础出发,以对人道现实的关怀为最终旨归,强调“为道者”修行中“损”的重要性。因此,在不同范畴中,其虽包含统一性,但在具体内容上略有分别:整体上,“损”、“益”以“和”为原则;人道视域下,“为学”与“为道”相和相成,益的是大道真知,损的是“有为”。在此基础之上,“日损”、“损之又损”才能实现真正的无为。老子的主“损”论不仅是针对当时社会现状、社会问题所提出的解决方法,置之于中国高速发展的今天,亦于精神文明建设等方面具有积极的借鉴意义。
Abstract: Laozi said “reduction” and “increase”, starting from the metaphysical basis of Tao and Heaven, taking the concern for the reality of humanity as the ultimate goal, emphasizing the importance of “reduction” in the practice of Tao. Therefore, although it contains unity in different categories, it is slightly different in specific content: on the whole, “reduction” and “increase” are based on the principle of “harmony”; from a humane perspective, “learning" and “practice of Tao” are in harmony with each other, they benefit the true knowledge of the road and reduce “action”. On this basis, “daily reducing” and “reducing and reducing” can achieve real inaction. Laozi’s theory of principal “reduction” is not only a solution to the current social situation and social problems at that time, but also has positive reference significance in the construction of spiritual civilization in today’s rapid development of China.
文章引用:李锡林. 论老子的“损”与“益”[J]. 哲学进展, 2022, 11(6): 1631-1636. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACPP.2022.116278

参考文献

[1] 许慎. 说文解字[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2015.
[2] 张岱年. 中国哲学史大纲——中国哲学问题史[M]. 北京: 昆仑出版社, 2010: 485.
[3] 楼宇烈. 老子道德经注校释[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1984.
[4] 庄周. 庄子[M]. 方勇, 译注. 北京: 中华书局, 2015.
[5] 刘安. 淮南子[M]. 陈广忠, 译注. 北京: 中华书局, 2012.
[6] 刘笑敢. 老子古今: 五种对堪舆析评引论修订版[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1984.
[7] 冯有兰. 中国哲学史新编[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2010: 343.
[8] 陈鼓应. 老子今注今译[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2020.
[9] 高亨. 老子译注[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2010: 81.
[10] 张松辉. 老子新解[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2018: 141.
[11] 撒穆尔∙伊诺克∙斯通普夫. 西方哲学史[M]. 邓晓芒, 匡宏, 译. 北京: 北京联合出版公司, 2019: 46.
[12] 刘爱军. 本体、方法与科学: 中西方哲学知识论的区别及其根由[J]. 哲学研究, 2015(11): 105-109.
[13] 郭振香. 老子“为道日损,损之又损”的思辨理路探析[J]. 学术界, 2019(12): 85-93.