低强度单波长红光仪与针刺疗法防控青少年儿童近视的疗效对比分析
Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Low-Intensity Single-Wavelength Red Light Instrument and Acupuncture Therapy for Preventing and Controlling Myopia in Adolescent Children
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2022.12121593, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 贾仕玉, 丁艳丽, 景海霞:甘肃中医药大学第一临床医学院,甘肃 兰州;张娜娜:甘肃省人民医院眼视光学中心,甘肃 兰州;刘丁龙:甘肃省人民医院传统医学诊疗中心,甘肃 兰州;刘 勤*:甘肃中医药大学第一临床医学院,甘肃 兰州;甘肃省人民医院眼视光学中心,甘肃 兰州
关键词: 近视针刺低强度单波长红光仪裸眼视力眼轴屈光度Myopia Acupuncture Low-Intensity Single-Wavelength Red Light Instrument Naked Eye Vision Eye Axis Diopter
摘要: 目的:观察低强度单波长红光仪与针刺疗法对青少年儿童近视进展的防控效果。方法:随机对照研究。在我院眼视光学中心就诊的患者中,选取7~15岁近视患者90例(180只眼),分为低强度单波长红光仪组30例(60只眼)、针刺组30例(60只眼)和对照组30例(60只眼)。低强度单波长红光仪组采用低强度单波长红光仪进行近视防控干预,非干预时间佩戴普通近视框架眼镜,针刺组每周一次穴位针刺疗法进行近视防控干预,非干预时间佩戴普通近视框架眼镜,对照组佩戴普通近视框架进行日常生活及学习。干预期间规律复诊,观察并比较干预前和干预后1、2、3、6个月患者的裸眼视力、屈光度以及眼轴长度。采用SPSS25.0软件对数据进行统计学分析。结果:与初筛时相比,干预1、2、3、6个月后,低强度单波长红光仪组裸眼视力基本趋于稳定,针刺组裸眼视力稍有所改善,对照组裸眼视力呈下降趋势,三组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);干预1、2、3、6个月后,低强度单波长红光仪组屈光度基本保持稳定,针刺组屈光度增长缓慢,对照组屈光度增长较明显,三组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05);干预1、2、3、6个月后,低强度单波长红光仪组眼轴长度逐渐缩短,针刺组眼轴长度增长缓慢,对照组眼轴长度增长较明显,三组间比较差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:低强度单波长红光仪及针刺疗法对延缓青少年儿童近视进展有一定疗效,干预期间未见明显不良反应。
Abstract: Objective: To observe the prevention and control effect of low-intensity single-wavelength red light instrument and acupuncture on the progress of myopia in adolescents and children. Methods: Ran-domized controlled study. A total of 90 myopic patients aged 7~15 years (180 eyes) were selected and divided into low-intensity single-wavelength red light instrument group (30 cases, 60 eyes), acupuncture group (30 cases, 60 eyes) and control group (30 cases, 60 eyes). Low-intensity sin-gle-wavelength red light instrument group with low-intensity of single-wavelength red light in-strument myopia prevention and control intervention, the non-intervention time wear ordinary myopia glasses, acupuncture group once a week point acupuncture myopia prevention and control intervention, the non-intervention time wear ordinary myopia glasses, control group wear ordinary myopia framework in daily life and study. Regular review during intervention. The naked eye visual acuity, diopter and axial length of patients were observed and compared before intervention and 1, 2, 3 and 6 months after intervention. SPSS25.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: Compared with the initial screening, after 1, 2, 3 and 6 months of intervention, the naked eye visual acuity of the low-intensity single-wavelength red light instrument group basically tended to be sta-ble, the naked eye visual acuity of the acupuncture group was slightly improved, and the naked eye visual acuity of the control group showed a downward trend, with statistical significance among the three groups (P < 0.05). After 1, 2, 3 and 6 months of intervention, the diopter of the low-intensity single-wavelength red light instrument group was basically stable, while the diopter of the acu-puncture group increased slowly, and the diopter of the control group increased significantly, with statistical significance among the three groups (P < 0.05). After 1, 2, 3 and 6 months of intervention, the axial length of the low-intensity single-wavelength red light instrument group was gradually shortened, the axial length of the acupuncture group was slowly increased, and the axial length of the control group was significantly increased, with statistical significance among the three groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Low-intensity single-wavelength red light instrument and acupuncture therapy can delay the progress of myopia in children and adolescents.
文章引用:贾仕玉, 张娜娜, 刘丁龙, 刘勤, 丁艳丽, 景海霞. 低强度单波长红光仪与针刺疗法防控青少年儿童近视的疗效对比分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2022, 12(12): 11057-11064. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2022.12121593

参考文献

[1] Németh, J., et al. (2021) Update and Guidance on Management of Myopia. European Society of Ophthalmology in Co-operation with International Myopia Institute. European Journal of Ophthalmology, 31, 853-883.
[2] Huang, L., Ka-wasaki, H., Liu, Y., et al. (2019) The Prevalence of Myopia and the Factors Associated with It among University Stu-dents in Nanjing: Across-Sectional Study. Medicine (Baltimore), 98, e14777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Sun, J.T., An, M., Yan, X.B., et al. (2018) Prevalence and Related Factors for Myopia in School-Aged Children in Qingdao. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2018, Article ID: 9781987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Jonas, J.B., et al. (2017) Retinal Pigment Epithelium Cell Density in Relationship to Axial Length in Human Eyes. Acta Ophthalmologica, 95, e22-e28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Pucker, A.D., et al. (2020) Morphological Ciliary Muscle Changes Associ-ated with Form Deprivation-Induced Myopia. Experimental Eye Research, 193, Article ID: 107963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Yu, Q. and Zhou, J.B. (2022) Scleral Remodeling in Myopia De-velopment. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 15, 510-514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Du, R., Xie, S., Igarashi-Yokoi, T., et al. (2021) Continued Increase of Axial Length and Its Risk Factors in Adults with High Myopia. JAMA Ophthalmology, 139, 1096-1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Tian, L., et al. (2021) Co-Existence of Myopia and Am-blyopia in a Guinea Pig Model with Monocular Form Deprivation. Annals of Translational Medicine, 9, Article No. 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] She, Z.H., et al. (2021) The Development of and Recovery from Form-Deprivation Myopia in Infant Rhesus Monkeys Reared under Reduced Ambient Lighting. Vision Research, 183, 106-117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Carr, B.J., et al. (2019) Alpha2-Adrenoceptor Agonists Inhibit Form-Deprivation Myopia in the Chick. Clinical & Experimental Optometry, 102, 418-425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[11] Wu, H., et al. (2018) Scleral Hypoxia Is a Target for Myopia Control. Pro-ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, E7091-E7100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Zhou, X., et al. (2020) Increased Choroidal Blood Perfusion Can Inhibit Form Deprivation Myopia in Guinea Pigs. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 61, Article No. 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] García García, M., et al. (2019) A Global Approach to Describe Retinal Defocus Patterns. PLOS ONE, 14, e0213574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Kumar, S., et al. (2022) A Robust Microbead Occlusion Model of Glaucoma for the Common Marmoset. Translational Vision Science & Technology, 11, Article No. 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Yuan, X.-L., et al. (2021) Corneal Curvature-Associated MTOR Variant Differentiates Mild Myopia from High Myopia in Han Chinese Population. Ophthalmic Genetics, 42, 446-457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Seow, W.J., et al. (2019) In-Utero Epigenetic Factors Are Associated with Early-Onset Myopia in Young Children. PLOS ONE, 14, e0214791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Tedja, M.S., et al. (2019) IMI—Myopia Genetics Report. Inves-tigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 60, M89-M105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Zhao, F., et al. (2018) Virtual Reality: A Possible Approach to Myopia Prevention and Control? Medical Hypotheses, 121, 1-3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Xiang, Z.-Y. and Zou, H.-D. (2020) Recent Epidemiology Study Data of Myopia. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020, Article ID: 4395278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Jiang, Y., et al. (2022) Effect of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Ther-apy for Myopia Control in Children: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Ophthalmology, 129, 509-519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[21] 王一鹏, 陈松, 杨文超, 等. 治疗性650 nm低功率半导体激光照射鸡视网膜的安全剂量研究[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志, 2020, 38(7): 573-580.
[22] Xiong, F., et al. (2021) Or-thokeratology and Low-Intensity Laser Therapy for Slowing the Progression of Myopia in Children. BioMed Research International, 2021, Article ID: 8915867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 闫艺, 薛文娟, 赵延军, 等. 650 nm半导体激光控制青少年儿童近视进展的研究[J]. 临床眼科杂志, 2021, 29(2): 132-137.
[24] 陈培正, 等. 艾尔兴哺光仪控制青少年、儿童近视疗效分析[J]. 实用中西医结合临床, 2018, 18(10): 63-64+106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef