儒家伦理视野下的《伤逝》
Regret for the Past from the Perspective of Confucian Ethics
摘要: 儒家文化统制中国两千多年,其中的儒家伦理文化对国人留下了深重的影响,甚至在极度追求现代性的现代文学中也无法避免。《伤逝》中的涓生和子君无疑是处于由传统到现代转型期的中国知识分子。他们有对自由、平等、独立的现代追求,却又深受旧时代儒家伦理的思想桎梏,特别是儒家伦理中的性别伦理、责任伦理在他们身上仍有深重的残留,并最终导致了爱情悲剧。将《伤逝》置于儒家伦理视野下来考察,能从一个侧面理解这个爱情悲剧必然发生的缘由,同时为建构现代中国人健康的新儒家伦理提供借鉴。
Abstract:
The Confucian culture has dominated China for more than 2000 years, and the Confucian ethics among them have left a deep influence on Chinese people, even in the modern literature which is extremely pursuing modernity. Juansheng and Zijun in Re-gret for the Past are undoubtedly Chinese intellectuals in the transition period from tradition to modern times. They have a modern pursuit of freedom, equality and independence, but they are deeply shackled by the Confucian ethics of the old times. In particular, the gender ethics and re-sponsibility ethics in the Confucian ethics still have a deep residue on them, and ultimately led to the tragedy of love. The study of Regret for the Past from the perspective of Confucian ethics can help us understand the inevitable love tragedy from one side, and at the same time provide a ref-erence for the construction of modern Chinese healthy neo Confucian ethics.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
欧阳哲生. 新文化的传统——五四人物与思想研究[M]. 广州: 广东人民出版社, 2004: 56.
|
|
[2]
|
费孝通. 乡土中国[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2007: 43.
|
|
[3]
|
(美)黄仁宇. 中国大历史[M]. 北京: 三联书店, 1997: 29.
|
|
[4]
|
(美)费正清, 著. 伟大的中国革命[M]. 刘尊棋, 译. 北京: 世界知识出版社, 2000: 82.
|
|
[5]
|
鲁迅. 南腔北调集∙关于妇女解放[M]//《鲁迅全集》第4卷. 北京: 人民文学出版社, 1981: 597.
|
|
[6]
|
鲁迅. 伤逝[M]//严家炎. 《二十世纪中国文学作品选》(上). 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2013: 127-139.
|
|
[7]
|
郜元宝. 关于伤逝[M]//鲁迅六讲(增订本). 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2007: 274, 275, 276.
|
|
[8]
|
鲁迅. 娜拉走后怎样[M]//鲁迅全集(第1卷). 北京: 人民文学出版社, 2005: 168.
|
|
[9]
|
吴光, 钱明, 董平, 姚延福, 编. 《王阳明全集》(中册) [M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2006: 665.
|
|
[10]
|
岳寒飞, 卓光平. 自叙视角与话语遮蔽——鲁迅《伤逝》中涓生的自叙话语考察[J]. 绍兴文理学院学报, 2018, 38(1): 25-29.
|
|
[11]
|
陈思和, 止庵. 中国现当代小说名作欣赏[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2012: 33.
|
|
[12]
|
朱熹. 延平答问[M]//朱杰人, 严佐之, 刘永翔. 《朱子全书》第13册. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 合肥: 安徽教育出版社, 2002: 339.
|