浅析合法预期原则
A Brief Analysis of Legitimate Expectation
DOI: 10.12677/DS.2022.84150, PDF,   
作者: 朱逸凡:华东政法大学国际金融法律学院,上海
关键词: 合法预期实体性保护程序性保护 Legitimate Expectation Substantial Protection Procedural Protection
摘要: 合法预期原则起源于以英国为首的普通法国家。经过英国一系列判决,从程序性保护发端到实体性保护迈进。逐渐形成了以政府信任为基础,以实体性保护、程序性保护、补偿(赔偿)保护为救济手段的体系。中国学界对合法预期原则抱有极大的热情,但是立法和司法中对于合法预期态度模糊,合法预期原则未能彻底走上正轨。且目前很多能够由合法预期原则大展身手的领域,均被其他相关的制度取代,导致合法预期原则在中国引入缺乏必要性。
Abstract: The legitimate expectation originated from common law countries led by Britain. Through a series of judgments in the UK, the principle of legitimate expectation has moved from procedural protection to substantive protection. It has gradually developed into a system based on the trust of the government, with substantive protec-tion, procedural protection and compensation (indemnity) protection as the means of redress. Chi-nese academic study has great enthusiasm for the principle of legal expectation, but the legislative and judicial attitudes towards the principle of legal expectation are vague, and the principle of legal expectation has not been officially recognized. At present, many fields that can be fully utilized by the legal expectation principle are replaced by other related systems, which leads to the lack of ne-cessity for the introduction of the legal expectation principle in China.
文章引用:朱逸凡. 浅析合法预期原则[J]. 争议解决, 2022, 8(4): 1109-1116. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2022.84150

参考文献

[1] 骆梅英. 英国法上实体正当期待的司法审查——立足于考夫兰案的考察[J]. 环球法律评论, 2007(2): 115-123.
[2] 陈海萍. 行政相对人合法预期保护之研究——以行政规范性问津的变更为视角[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2012.
[3] 余凌云. 行政法上合法预期之保护[J]. 中国社会科学, 2003(3): 128-139+208.
[4] 陈海萍. 英国行政法上合法预期原则的最新发展[J]. 环球法律评论, 2014, 36(5): 99-111.
[5] 黄学贤. 行政法中合法预期保护的理论研究与实践发展[J]. 政治与法律, 2016(9): 83-97.
[6] 余凌云. 对《行政许可法》第8条的批判性思考——以九江市丽景湾项目纠纷案为素材[J]. 清华法学, 2007(4): 29-41.
[7] L. L.富勒, 小威廉•R. 帕杜. 合同损害赔偿中的信赖利益[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2004.
[8] 余凌云. 蕴育在法院判决之中的合法预期[J]. 中国法学, 2011(6): 162-177.