涉民营企业刑事错案防范对策研究
Research on the Prevention of Criminal Wrongful Cases Involving Private Enterprises
摘要: 涉民营企业刑事错案的产生不仅损害企业与企业家的合法权益,扰乱正常的社会主义市场经济秩序,同时也给刑事司法公正带来较大损害,影响了司法公信力。只有逐步完善错案纠正制度,增强司法公正,才能使民众对刑事法治树立信心。对此,需结合相关案例分析,探究涉民营企业刑事错案发生原因,提出防范对策,为预防涉民营企业刑事错案的发生提供参考。
Abstract: The occurrence of criminal wrongful convictions involving private enterprises not only damages the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises and entrepreneurs and disrupts the normal order of the socialist mar-ket economy, but also causes greater damage to criminal justice and affects judicial credibility. Only by gradually improving the system for correcting wrongful cases and enhancing judicial fairness can people build confidence in the criminal rule of law. In this regard, it is necessary to combine rele-vant case analysis to explore the reasons for the occurrence of criminal wrongful convictions in-volving private enterprises, and propose preventive countermeasures, so as to provide reference for preventing the occurrence of criminal wrongful convictions involving private enterprises.
文章引用:张曼. 涉民营企业刑事错案防范对策研究[J]. 争议解决, 2022, 8(4): 1126-1132. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2022.84152

参考文献

[1] 龚佳禾. “刑事错案认定标准”研究[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2007(5): 84-87.
[2] 王乐龙. 刑事错案概念再分析[J]. 法治论丛(上海政法学院学报), 2009, 24(2): 33-37.
[3] 王晓霞. 刑事错案认定标准的反思与重构[J]. 人民检察, 2006(22): 37-40.
[4] 田文昌. 冤假错案的五大成因[J]. 中外法学, 2015, 27(3): 576-579.
[5] 谢进杰. “疑罪从无”在实践中的艰难展开[J]. 犯罪研究, 2005(6): 42-46.
[6] 卢勤忠. 民营企业的刑事合规及刑事法风险防范探析[J]. 法学论坛, 2020, 35(4): 127-137.
[7] 万毅. “先刑后民”原则的实践困境及其理论破解[J]. 上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007(2): 19-27.
[8] 张明楷. 刑法学[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2020: 114.
[9] 张明楷. 论刑法分则中作为构成要件的“情节严重”[J]. 法商研究(中南政法学院学报), 1995(1): 14-19.
[10] 北大法宝: 最高人民法院发布6起人民法院充分发挥审判职能作用保护产权和企业家合法权益典型案例(第二批) [EB/OL].
https://www.pkulaw.com/chl/7afe1a682ed8e66ebdfb.html, 2022-07-12.
[11] 黄祥青. 职务侵占罪的立法分析与司法认定[J]. 法学评论, 2005(1): 80-86.
[12] 王作富. 挪用公款罪司法认定若干问题研究[J]. 政法论坛, 2001(4): 79-86.