产品伤害危机对消费者品牌信任的影响研究——基于网络负面口碑的调节作用
The Impact of Product Injury Crisis on Consumer Brand Trust—Based on the Moderating Effect of Negative Word-of-Mouth on the Internet
摘要: 以食品安全事件为背景,将产品伤害危机引发的感知损失作为自变量,从网络负面口碑和消费者宽恕两个方面,采用了实验设计并设置问卷的方法探究产品伤害危机对消费者购买的影响机理。研究结果表明,产品伤害危机感知损失对消费者品牌信任和购买意愿均存在负向影响,它随着网络负面口碑的增强而增强;消费者宽恕在产品伤害危机感知损失对品牌信任和购买意愿的影响中起中介作用,它随着网络负面口碑的增强而减弱。丰富了社会化媒体背景下产品伤害危机相关领域的文献,为其实际应对提供参考。
Abstract: In the context of food safety incidents, the perceived loss caused by product injury crisis was used as an independent variable, from two aspects of negative word-of-mouth on the Internet and consumer forgiveness, an experiment was designed and a questionnaire was designed to explore the mecha-nism of the impact of product injury crisis on consumer purchase. The results show that the per-ceived loss of product harm crisis has a negative impact on both brand trust and purchase inten-tion, and it increases with the increase of negative online word-of-mouth. Consumer forgiveness mediates the effect of perceived loss of product harm crisis on Brand Trust and purchase intention, which decreases with the increase of negative online word-of-mouth. It enriches the related litera-ture of product injury crisis under the background of social media, and provides reference for its actual response.
文章引用:安双格, 夏志杰. 产品伤害危机对消费者品牌信任的影响研究——基于网络负面口碑的调节作用[J]. 应用数学进展, 2022, 11(12): 8605-8613. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2022.1112907

参考文献

[1] 刘国华. 危机环境中的企业困境与自救——国内外企业危机研究综述与比较分析[J]. 上海管理科学, 2021, 43(2): 87-96.
[2] 张蓓, 万俊毅. 农产品伤害危机后消费者逆向行为影响因素研究[J]. 北京社会科学2014(7): 72-81.
[3] Stäbler, S. and Fischer, M. (2020) When Does Corporate Social Irresponsibility Become News? Evidence from More Than 1, 000 Brand Transgressions across Five Countries. Journal of Marketing, 84, 46-67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Vedadi, A. and Greer, T.H. (2021) Revisiting How Perceived Uncertainty and Herd Behavior Influence Technology Choice. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 33, 1-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Dutta, S. and Pullig, C. (2011) Effectiveness of Corporate Re-sponses to Brand Crises: The Role of Crisis Type and Response Strategies. Journal of Business Research, 64, 1281-1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 陶红, 卫海英. 抢雷策略对品牌危机修复效果的影响研究——品牌危机类型、品牌声誉的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, 19(3): 77-88+97.
[7] 于维娜, 樊耘, 张婕, 门一. 宽恕视角下辱虐管理对工作绩效的影响——下属传统性和上下级关系的作用, 南开管理评论, 2015, 18(6): 16-25.
[8] Ngai, S.B.C. and Falkheimer, J. (2017) How IKEA Turned a Crisis into an Opportunity. Pub-lic Relations Review, 43, 246-248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Vohs, K.D., Aaker, J.L. and Catapano, R. (2019) It’s Not Going to Be That Fun: Negative Experiences Can Add Meaning to Life. Current Opinion in Psychology, 26, 11-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] 陈晓, 高辛, 周晖. 宽宏大量与睚眦必报: 宽恕和报复对愤怒的降低作用[J]. 心理学报, 2017, 49(2): 241-252.
[11] Sinha, J. and Lu, F.C. (2016) ‘I’ Val-ue Justice, but ‘We’ Value Relationships: Self-Construal Effects on Post-Transgres- sion Consumer Forgiveness. Jour-nal of Consumer Psychology, 26, 265-274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] 徐小龙. 产品伤害危机下消费者与品牌关系再续机制[J]. 现代经济探讨, 2015(4): 88-92.
[13] 徐小龙. 产品伤害危机下消费者–品牌关系断裂影响因素及作用机制[J]. 经济问题探索, 2013(5): 162-166.
[14] 张新国, 崔冬冬. 产品伤害危机后消费者购买意愿的恢复——以“低介入”情境为例[J]. 湖南师范大学社会科学学报, 2012, 41(3): 92-96.
[15] 王文峰, 李磊. 网络口碑对消费者再传播意愿的影响——基于消费者宽恕的中介作用[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2020(11): 124-127.
[16] 庞隽, 宋卓昭, 吕一林. 报复欲望和回避欲望: 实用性和享乐性产品失败后消费者反应的性别差异[J]. 管理评论, 2014, 26(2): 92-103.
[17] 李瑞强, 李永强, 张雪莲. 关系强度与非对称性对宽恕意愿的影响[J]. 财经科学, 2015(5): 97-109.
[18] East, R., Uncles, M.D., Romaniuk, J. and Lomax, W. (2016) Measuring the Impact of Positive and Negative Word of Mouth: A Reappraisal. Australasian Marketing Journal, 24, 54-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 韩心瑜, 张向达. 在线评论影响顾客资产的机制研究——基于品牌信任视角的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2018(11): 151-153+164.
[20] 孙瑾, 郑雨, 陈静. 感知在线评论可信度对消费者信任的影响研究——不确定规避的调节作用[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(4): 146-159.
[21] 郭晶, 石悦. 负面网络口碑的消费者效应研究综述[J]. 品牌研究, 2020(4): 121-125.
[22] 张蓓, 陈玉婕, 马如秋. 食品伤害危机消费者宽恕意愿形成机理研究——网络负面口碑的调节作用[J]. 南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2019, 50(3): 65-74.
[23] Mena, S., Rintamki, J., Fleming, P. and Spicer, A. (2016) On the Forgetting of Corporate Irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 41, 720-738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef