抗菌生物材料在骨感染中应用的研究进展
Research Progress on the Application of Antibacterial Biomaterials in Bone Infection
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2022.12121614, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 李 森, 苑 龙, 李万祥, 延易泽, 崔心广:济宁医学院临床医学院,山东 济宁;卞继超, 王国栋*:济宁医学院附属医院关节与运动医学科,山东 济宁
关键词: 骨感染3D打印抗菌生物材料综述Bone Infection 3D Printing Antibacterial Biomaterials Review
摘要: 骨感染是目前骨科常见并且难以治愈的疾病。其主要的病原菌是金黄色葡萄球菌,感染过程中主要特征是生物膜的形成,这也是病菌难清除的主要原因。骨感染常常伴有骨缺损,这需要有创手术并可能发生反复感染,这给病人带来了极大的痛苦。新兴的抗菌生物材料因其良好的生物相容性及抗菌能力而受到关注。利用3D打印技术和金属离子、纳米材料、水凝胶等物质的结合可以生产出不同的抗菌生物材料。这些材料有着不俗的抗菌能力但也有着明显的缺点。本文主要对负载金属涂层的抗菌植入物、灌注抗生素的支架及抗菌水凝胶进行了简要说明。
Abstract: Bone infection is a common and difficult disease in orthopedics department. The main pathogen is Staphylococcus aureus, and the main feature of the infection process is the formation of biofilm, which is also the main reason for the difficult removal of bacteria. Bone infections are often accom-panied by bone defects that require invasive surgery and can lead to repeated infections, which can be extremely painful for patients. The emerging antibacterial biomaterials have more attention because of their good biocompatibility and antibacterial ability. Different antibacterial biomaterials can be produced by combining 3D printing technology with metal ions, nanomaterials, hydrogels and other substances. These materials have excellent antibacterial properties but also have obvious disadvantages. In this paper, antibacterial implants loaded with metal coating, stents infused with antibiotics and antibacterial hydrogels were briefly described.
文章引用:李森, 苑龙, 李万祥, 延易泽, 崔心广, 卞继超, 王国栋. 抗菌生物材料在骨感染中应用的研究进展[J]. 临床医学进展, 2022, 12(12): 11194-11201. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2022.12121614

参考文献

[1] Lu, H., Liu, Y., Guo, J., et al. (2016) Biomaterials with Antibacterial and Osteoinductive Properties to Repair Infected Bone Defects. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Mehnath, S., Ayisha Sithika, M.A., Arjama, M., et al. (2019) Seri-cin-Chitosan Doped Maleate Gellan Gum Nanocomposites for Effective Cell Damage in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 122, 174-184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[3] Guo, X., Chen, M., Feng, W., et al. (2011) Electrostatic Self-Assembly of Multilayer Copolymeric Membranes on the Surface of Porous Tantalum Implants for Sustained Re-lease of Doxorubicin. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 6, 3057-3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Zeng, H., Pang, X., Wang, S., et al. (2015) The Preparation of Core/Shell Structured Microsphere of Multi First-Line Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs and Evaluation of Biological Safety. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 8, 8398-8414.
[5] Li, K., Zhu, M., Xu, P., et al. (2015) Three-Dimensionally Plotted MBG/PHBHHx Composite Scaffold for Antitubercular Drug Delivery and Tissue Regen-eration. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 26, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Liu, Y., Zhu, J. and Jiang, D. (2017) Release Characteristics of Bone-Like Hydroxyapatite/Poly Amino Acid Loaded with Rifapentine Microspheres in Vivo. Molecular Medicine Re-ports, 16, 1425-1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Qayoom, I., Verma, R., Murugan, P.A., et al. (2020) A Biphasic Na-nohydroxyapatite/Calcium Sulphate Carrier Containing Rifampicin and Isoniazid for Local Delivery Gives Sustained and Effective Antibiotic Release and Prevents Biofilm Formation. Scientific Reports, 10, Article No. 14128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] Cyphert, E.L., Lu, C.Y., Marques, D.W., et al. (2020) Combina-tion Antibiotic Delivery in PMMA Provides Sustained Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Activity and Allows for Postim-plantation Refilling. Biomacromolecules, 21, 854-866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Khalaf, A.T., Wei, Y., Wan, J., et al. (2022) Bone Tissue Engi-neering through 3D Bioprinting of Bioceramic Scaffolds: A Review and Update. Life (Basel), 12, Article No. 903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[10] Chen, Z.Y., Gao, S., Zhang, Y.W., et al. (2021) Antibacterial Biomateri-als in Bone Tissue Engineering. Journal of Materials Chemistry B, 9, 2594-2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Cui, M., Pan, H., Li, L., et al. (2021) Exploration and Preparation of Patient-Specific Ciprofloxacin Implants Drug Delivery System via 3D Printing Technologies. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 110, 3678-3689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Ramesh, S., Kovelakuntla, V., Meyer, A.S., et al. (2020) Three-Dimensional Printing of Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogel with Antibacterial Activity. Bioprinting, 24, e00106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Siddiqui, N., Asawa, S., Birru, B., et al. (2018) PCL-Based Composite Scaffold Matrices for Tissue Engineering Applications. Molecular Biotechnology, 60, 506-532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[14] Chen, X., Gleeson, S.E., Yu, T., et al. (2017) Hierarchically Or-dered Polymer Nanofiber Shish Kebabs as a Bone Scaffold Material. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 105, 1786-1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] Barba, A., Maazouz, Y., Diez-Escudero, A., et al. (2018) Osteogenesis by Foamed and 3D-Printed Nanostructured Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds: Effect of Pore Architecture. Acta Biomaterialia, 79, 135-147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Arciola, C.R., Campoccia, D., Montanaro, L. (2018) Implant In-fections: Adhesion, Biofilm Formation and Immune Evasion. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 16, 397-409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Masters, E.A., Ricciardi, B.F., Bentley, K.L.M., et al. (2022) Skeletal Infections: Microbial Pathogenesis, Immunity and Clinical Management. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 20, 385-400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Sarkissian, E.J., Gans, I., Gunderson, M.A., et al. (2016) Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Musculoskeletal Infections: Emerging Trends over the Past Decade. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 36, 323-327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Kernéis, S., Plainvert, C., Barnier, J.P., et al. (2017) Clinical and Microbiological Features Associated with Group B Streptococcus Bone and Joint Infections, France 2004-2014. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 36, 1679-1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] Ahmed, S., Meghji, S., Williams, R.J., et al. (2001) Staphylococ-cus aureus Fibronectin Binding Proteins Are Essential for Internalization by Osteoblasts But Do Not Account for Dif-ferences in Intracellular Levels of Bacteria. Infection and Immunity, 69, 2872-2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Ellington, J.K., Harris, M., Webb, L., et al. (2003) Intracel-lular Staphylococcus aureus. A Mechanism for the Indolence of Osteomyelitis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 85, 918-921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Josse, J., Velard, F. and Gangloff, S.C. (2015) Staphylococ-cus aureus vs. Osteoblast: Relationship and Consequences in Osteomyelitis. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbi-ology, 5, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Roper, P.M., Shao, C. and Veis, D.J. (2020) Multi-tasking by the OC Lineage during Bone Infection: Bone Resorption, Immune Modulation, and Microbial Niche. Cells, 9, 2157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Yang, D., Wijenayaka, A.R., Solomon, L.B., et al. (2018) Novel Insights into Staphylococcus aureus Deep Bone Infections: The Involvement of Osteocytes. mBio, 9, e00415-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Foster, T.J., Geoghegan, J.A., Ganesh, V.K., et al. (2014) Adhesion, Invasion and Evasion: The Many Functions of the Surface Proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nature Reviews Microbi-ology, 12, 49-62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Edwards, A.M., Potts, J.R., Josefsson, E., et al. (2010) Staphylococcus aureus Host Cell Invasion and Virulence in Sepsis Is Facilitated by the Multiple Repeats within FnBPA. PLOS Patho-gens, 6, e1000964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Edwards, A.M., Potter, U., Meenan, N.A., et al. (2011) Staphy-lococcus aureus Keratinocyte Invasion Is Dependent upon Multiple High-Affinity Fibronectin-Binding Repeats within FnBPA. PLOS ONE, 6, e18899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] Alva-Murillo, N., López-Meza, J.E., Ochoa-Zarzosa, A. (2014) Nonprofessional Phagocytic Cell Receptors Involved in Staphylococcus aureus Internalization. BioMed Research Inter-national, 2014, Article ID: 538546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[29] Horn, J., Stelzner, K., Rudel, T., et al. (2018) Inside Job: Staphylococcus aureus Host-Pathogen Interactions. International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 308, 607-624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[30] Zhang, T., Wei, Q., Zhou, H., et al. (2020) Sustainable Release of Vancomycin from Micro-Arc Oxidised 3D-Printed Porous Ti6Al4V for Treating Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bone Infection and Enhancing Osteogenesis in a Rabbit Tibia Osteomyelitis Model. Biomaterials Science, 8, 3106-3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] Raynaud-Messina, B., Verollet, C., Maridonneau-Parini, I. (2019) The Osteoclast, a Target Cell for Microorganisms. Bone, 127, 315-323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[32] Alexander, E.H., Rivera, F.A., Marriott, I., et al. (2003) Staphylo-coccus aureus-Induced Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand Expression Mediates Apoptosis and Caspase-8 Activation in Infected Osteoblasts. BMC Microbiology, 3, Article No. 5.
[33] Wang, N., Fuh, J.Y.H., Dheen, S.T., et al. (2021) Functions and Applications of Metallic and Metallic Oxide Nanoparticles in Orthopedic Implants and Scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 109, 160-179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[34] Qing, Y., Li, K., Li, D., et al. (2020) Antibacterial Effects of Silver In-corporated Zeolite Coatings on 3D Printed Porous Stainless Steels. Materials Science & Engineering C, Materials for Bi-ological Applications, 108, Article ID: 110430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[35] Vu, A.A., Rob-ertson, S.F., Ke, D., et al. (2019) Mechanical and Biological Properties of ZnO, SiO2, and Ag2O Doped Plasma Sprayed Hydroxyapatite Coating for Orthopaedic and Dental Applications. Acta Biomaterialia, 92, 325-335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[36] Zou, Y.H., Wang, J., Cui, L.Y., et al. (2019) Corrosion Re-sistance and Antibacterial Activity of Zinc-Loaded Montmorillonite Coatings on Biodegradable Magnesium Alloy AZ31. Acta Biomaterialia, 98, 196-214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[37] Tong, X., Shi, Z., Xu, L., et al. (2020) Degradation Behavior, Cytotoxicity, Hemolysis, and Antibacterial Properties of Electro-Deposited Zn-Cu Metal Foams as Potential Biodegrada-ble Bone Implants. Acta Biomaterialia, 102, 481-492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[38] Tao, B., Chen, M., Lin, C., et al. (2019) Zn-Incorporation with Graphene Oxide on Ti Substrates Surface to Improve Osteogenic Activity and Inhibit Bacterial Adhesion. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 107, 2310-2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[39] Shen, X., Zhang, Y., Ma, P., et al. (2019) Fabrication of Magnesi-um/Zinc-Metal Organic Framework on Titanium Implants to Inhibit Bacterial Infection and Promote Bone Regeneration. Biomaterials, 212, 1-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[40] Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R., Dayaghi, E., Ismail, A.F., et al. (2019) Synthesis and In-Vitro Characterization of Biodegradable Porous Magnesium-Based Scaffolds Containing Silver for Bone Tissue Engineering. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 29, 984-996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[41] Pearlin, Nayak, S., Manivasagam, G., et al. (2018) Progress of Regenerative Therapy in Orthopedics. Current Osteoporosis Reports, 16, 169-181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[42] Roseti, L., Parisi, V., Petretta, M., et al. (2017) Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the Art and New Perspectives. Materials Science & Engineering C, Materials for Biological Applications, 78, 1246-1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[43] Zhang, X. and Zhang, Y. (2015) Tissue Engineering Applications of Three-Dimensional Bioprinting. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 72, 777-782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[44] Aragón, J., Feoli, S., Irusta, S., et al. (2019) Composite Scaffold Obtained by Electro-Hydrodynamic Technique for Infection Prevention and Treatment in Bone Repair. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 557, 162-169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[45] Cobos, M., Ramos, J.R., Guzmán, D.J., et al. (2018) PCL/POSS Nanocomposites: Effect of POSS Derivative and Preparation Method on Morphology and Properties. Poly-mers (Basel), 11, Article No. 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[46] Gadalla, D., Goldstein, A.S. (2020) Improving the Osteogenicity of PCL Fiber Substrates by Surface-Immobilization of Bone Morphogenic Protein-2. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 48, 1006-1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[47] Aragón, J., Salerno, S., De Bartolo, L., et al. (2018) Polymeric Electrospun Scaffolds for Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Delivery in Bone Tissue Engineering. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 531, 126-137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[48] Sousa, C., Rodrigues, D., Oliveira, R., et al. (2011) Superhydro-phobic Poly(L-lactic acid) Surface as Potential Bacterial Colonization Substrate. AMB Express, 1, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[49] Buxadera-Palomero, J., Canal, C., Torrent-Camarero, S., et al. (2015) Antifouling Coatings for Dental Implants: Polyethylene Glycol-Like Coatings on Titanium by Plasma Polymerization. Bi-ointerphases, 10, Article ID: 029505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[50] Bai, J., Wang, H., Gao, W., et al. (2020) Melt Electrohydrodynamic 3D Printed Poly(ε-caprolactone)/Polyethylene Glycol/Roxithromycin Scaffold as a Potential Anti-Infective Implant in Bone Repair. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 576, Article ID: 118941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[51] Watcharajittanont, N., Tabrizian, M., Putson, C., et al. (2020) Osseointegrated Membranes Based on Electro-Spun TiO(2)/Hydroxyapatite/Polyurethane for Oral Maxillofacial Surgery. Materials Science & Engineering C, Materials for Biological Applications, 108, Article ID: 110479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[52] Rodríguez-Vázquez, M. and Ramos-Zúñiga, R. (2020) Chi-tosan-Hydroxyapatite Scaffold for Tissue Engineering in Experimental Lumbar Laminectomy and Posterolateral Spinal Fusion in Wistar Rats. Asian Spine Journal, 14, 139-147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[53] Gupta, A., Mumtaz, S., Li, C.H., et al. (2019) Combatting Antibi-otic-Resistant Bacteria Using Nanomaterials. Chemical Society Reviews, 48, 415-427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[54] Benedini, L., Laiuppa, J., Santillán, G., et al. (2020) Antibacterial Algi-nate/Nano-Hydroxyapatite Composites for Bone Tissue Engineering: Assessment of Their Bioactivity, Biocompatibility, and Antibacterial Activity. Materials Science & Engineering C, Materials for Biological Applications, 115, Article ID: 111101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[55] Manzano, M. and Vallet-Regí, M. (2018) Mesoporous Silica Na-noparticles in Nanomedicine Applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 29, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[56] Wang, Y. and Gu, H. (2015) Core-Shell-Type Magnetic Meso-porous Silica Nanocomposites for Bioimaging and Therapeutic Agent Delivery. Advanced Materials, 27, 576-585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[57] Perera, K., Ivone, R., Natekin, E., et al. (2021) 3D Bioprinted Im-plants for Cartilage Repair in Intervertebral Discs and Knee Menisci. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 9, Article ID: 754113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[58] Li, S., Dong, S., Xu, W., et al. (2018) Antibacterial Hydrogels. Advanced Science (Weinh), 5, Article ID: 1700527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[59] Hua, L., Lei, T., Qian, H., et al. (2021) 3D-Printed Porous Tantalum: Recent Application in Various Drug Delivery Systems to Repair Hard Tissue Defects. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 18, 625-634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[60] Posadowska, U., Brzychczy-Włoch, M., Drożdż, A., et al. (2016) Injectable Hybrid Delivery System Composed of Gellan Gum, Nanoparticles and Gentamicin for the Localized Treatment of Bone Infections. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 13, 613-620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[61] De Mori, A., Hafidh, M., Mele, N., et al. (2019) Sustained Release from Injectable Composite Gels Loaded with Silver Nanowires Designed to Combat Bacterial Resistance in Bone Regeneration Applications. Pharmaceutics, 11, Article No. 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[62] Makvandi, P., Ali, G.W., Della Sala, F., et al. (2020) Hyalu-ronic Acid/Corn Silk Extract Based Injectable Nanocomposite: A Biomimetic Antibacterial Scaffold for Bone Tissue Re-generation. Materials Science & Engineering C, Materials for Biological Applications, 107, Article ID: 110195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[63] Taglietti, A., Diaz Fernandez, Y.A., Amato, E., et al. (2012) An-tibacterial Activity of Glutathione-Coated Silver Nanoparticles against Gram Positive and Gram Negative Bacteria. Langmuir, 28, 8140-8148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]