MOOCs采纳行为意图的元分析
A Meta-Analysis of MOOCs Adoption Behavior Intention
DOI: 10.12677/ASS.2022.1112703, PDF,  被引量    科研立项经费支持
作者: 吴 冰, 赛争奇:同济大学,经济与管理学院,上海
关键词: MOOCs元分析信息系统采纳行为意图文化差异MOOCs Meta-Analysis Information System Adoption Behavioral Intention Cultural Differences
摘要: MOOCs学习具有巨大优势,随着MOOCs在全球的发展,在MOOCs采纳方面取得了很多研究成果,但受限于研究理论和研究样本,这些研究可能出现研究结果不一致的情形,因此需要综合MOOCs采纳研究文献进行元分析,但目前MOOCs领域的元分析研究尚缺乏。本文广泛收集MOOCs采纳实证研究,筛选出43篇文献,采用元分析探讨MOOCs采纳行为意图的影响因素,以及文化差异的调节作用。研究结果表明:1) MOOCs使用态度对MOOCs采纳行为意图有较强的正向影响;2) MOOCs感知有用性和内在动机对MOOCs采纳行为意图有中等强度的影响;3) MOOCs感知易用性和主观规范对MOOCs采纳行为意图的影响较弱;4) MOOCs感知行为控制对MOOCs采纳行为意图无显著影响;5) 文化背景作为调节因素,作用于MOOCs感知易用性对MOOCs采纳行为意图的影响。本研究为MOOCs采纳研究构建了系统的理论框架。
Abstract: MOOCs learning has great advantages. With the global development of MOOCs, many researches focus on the adoption of MOOCs, but limited by research theories and research samples, these studies may have inconsistent research results, so it is necessary to integrate these researches by meta-analysis. However, there is still a lack of meta-analysis research in the field of MOOCs. Based on the extensive collection of empirical studies on the adoption of MOOCs, this paper selects 43 literatures, and uses a meta-analysis to explore the influencing factors of MOOCs adoption behavioral intentions, as well as the moderating effects of cultural differences. The results show that: 1) MOOCs use attitude has a strong positive effect on MOOCs adopting behavioral intention; 2) MOOCs perceived usefulness and the intrinsic motivation have a moderately strong influence on MOOCs adopting behavioral intention; 3) The perceived ease of use of MOOCs and the subjective norm have a weak influence on MOOCs adoption behavior intention; 4) MOOCs perceived behavior control has no significant effect on MOOCs adoption behavior intention; 5) Cultural background as a moderating factor, influences MOOCs perceived ease of use on MOOCs adoption behavior intention. This research provides theoretical guidance for constructing a comprehensive framework for MOOCs adoption research.
文章引用:吴冰, 赛争奇. MOOCs采纳行为意图的元分析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2022, 11(12): 5159-5168. https://doi.org/10.12677/ASS.2022.1112703

参考文献

[1] Estrada-Molina, O. and Fuentes-Cancell, D.R. (2022) Engagement and Desertion in MOOCs: Systematic Review. Comunicar, 30, 111-124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Jordan, K. (2014) Initial Trends in Enrolment and Completion of Massive Open Online Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15, 133-160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Ma, L. and Lee, C.S. (2019) Understanding the Barriers to the Use of MOOCs in a Developing Country: An Innovation Resistance Perspective. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57, 571-590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Dwivedi, Y.K., Ismagilova, E., Sarker, P., Jeyaraj, A., Jadil, Y. and Hughes, L.A. (2021) Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Model for Understanding Social Commerce Adoption. Information Systems Frontiers. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 夏丽华, 韩冬梅. 学习者文化因素对MOOCs参与度的影响——以edX平台为例[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2018, 36(2): 105-112.
[6] Pozon-Lopez, I., Kalinic, Z. and Higueras-Castillo, E. (2020) A Multi-Analytical Approach to Modeling of Customer Satisfaction and Intention to Use in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC). Interactive Learning Environments, 28, 1003-1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] 王建亚, 牛晓蓉, 万莉. 基于元分析的在线学习用户使用行为研究[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(1): 58-68.
[8] Kim, J., Yoo, M., Jang, Y.J. and Hoon, S. (2020) The Effect of MOOC-Based Learning in Korea: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 163-190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Zhao, Y., Wang, N., Li, Y.X., Zhou, R.X. and Li, S.S. (2021) Do Cultural Differences Affect Users’ e-Learning Adoption? A Meta-Analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52, 20-41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 邹菊梅. MOOC学习者的持续参与行为研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2017.
[11] Wu, B. and Chen, X.H. (2017) Continuance Intention to Use MOOCs: Integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Task Technology Fit (TTF) Model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221-232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Ajzen, I. (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Moon, J.W. and Kim, Y.G. (2001) Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context. Information & Management, 38, 217-230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Wu, B. and Zhang, C.Y. (2014) Empirical Study on Continuance Intentions towards E-Learning 2.0 Systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 33, 1027-1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Abdullah, F., Ward, R. and Ahmed, E. (2016) Investigating the Influence of the Most Commonly Used External Variables of TAM on Students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of E-Portfolios. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 75-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Nyeko, J.S. and Ogenmungu, C. (2017) Determinants of Electronic Learning Adoption in Higher Institutions of Learning in Uganda: A Learners’ Perspective. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 17, 7-20.
[18] Hsu, J.Y., Chen, C.C. and Ting, P.F. (2018) Understanding MOOC Continuance: An Empirical Examination of Social Support Theory. Interactive Learning Environments, 26, 1100-1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] 黄婷. 社交网络服务(SNS)的用户接受影响因素研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2010.
[20] Miller, K.A. (1988) Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Hu-man-Behavior—RYAN, RM. Contemporary Sociology—A Journal of Reviews, 17, 253-253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] Bandura, A. (1977) Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[22] Yi, M.Y. and Hwang, Y.J. (2003) Predicting the Use of Web-Based Information Systems: Self-Efficacy, Enjoyment, Learning Goal Orientation, and the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 59, 431-449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[23] Cheng, Y.M. (2012) Effects of Quality Antecedents on e-Learning Acceptance. Internet Research, 22, 361-390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[24] Reinecke, K. and Bernstein, A. (2013) Knowing What a User Likes: A Design Science Approach to Interfaces That Automatically Adapt to Culture. MIS Quarterly, 37, 427-453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[25] Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X.H. and Tarhini, T. (2017) Examining the Moderating Effect of Individual-Level Cultural Values on Users’ Acceptance of E-Learning in Developing Countries: A Structural Equation Modeling of an Extended Technology Acceptance Model. Interactive Learning Environments, 25, 306-328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[26] Dwivedi, Y.K., Shareef, M.A., Simintiras, A.C. and Lal, B. (2016) A Generalised Adoption Model for Services: A Cross-Country Comparison of Mobile Health (m-Health). Government Information Quarterly, 33, 174-187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[27] Shi, Y.C., Frederiksen, C.H. and Muis, K.R. (2013) A Cross-Cultural Study of Self-Regulated Learning in a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environment. Learning and Instruction, 23, 52-59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[28] Sanchez-Franco, M.J., Martinez-Lopez, F.J. and Martin-Velicia, F.A. (2009) Exploring the Impact of Individualism and Uncertainty Avoidance in Web-Based Electronic Learning: An Empirical Analysis in European Higher Education. Computers & Education, 52, 588-598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[29] de Mooij, M. and Hofstede, G. (2011) Cross-Cultural Consumer Behavior: A Review of Research Findings. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23, 181-192.
[30] Guilera, G., Barrios, M. and Gomez-Benito, J. (2013) Meta-Analysis in Psychology: A Bibliometric Study. Scientometrics, 94, 943-954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[31] 张晴. 企业社会资本与技术创新绩效关系的元分析研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2021.
[32] Cram, W.A., D’Arcy, J. and Proudfoot, J.G. (2019) Seeing the Forest and the Trees: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents to Information Security Policy Compliance. MIS Quarterly, 43, 525-554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef