论民事执行和解制度的完善
On the Improvement of Civil Enforcement Settlement System
摘要: 执行和解在解决执行程序中的纠纷方面具有不可替代的作用，而在现行的执行和解法律制度的实施中依然在立法和司法上存在许多缺陷和漏洞，如执行和解次数无限制、执行和解协议扣除已履行部分时无标准等。为了使执行和解更好地发挥其制度功能，本文以执行和解的概念、性质等基本理论为出发点，对存在的问题进行了深入的分析并提出了明确执行和解次数、统一扣除标准等相关完善建议。
Abstract:
The implementation of reconciliation has an irreplaceable role in resolving disputes in the implementation process. However, there are still many shortcomings and loopholes in the leg-islative and judicial framework under the current implementation of the reconciliation legal system, such as the number of execution reconciliations. The execution of the settlement agreement has been partially deducted without standards. In order to make the implementation of the reconcilia-tion better play its institutional functions, this paper takes the basic theories such as the concept and nature of reconciliation as the starting point, and deeply analyzes the existing problems and puts forward relevant suggestions for clear implementation of the number of reconciliations and unified deduction standards.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
韩红俊. 执行和解制度研究[J]. 理论月刊, 2010(3): 95-98.
|
|
[2]
|
张卫平. 执行和解制度的再认识[J]. 法学论坛, 2016, 31(4): 5-16.
|
|
[3]
|
孔金萍. 论我国执行和解协议救济机制的完善[J]. 甘肃社会科学, 2017(3): 162-167.
|
|
[4]
|
谭秋桂. 论民事执行和解的性质[J]. 法学杂志, 2020, 41(11): 16-28.
|
|
[5]
|
陈荣宗. 强制执行法[M]. 台北: 三民书局, 1999: 18.
|
|
[6]
|
于鹏, 赵丹阳. 赋予强制力抑或建立司法审查机制——执行和解双重救济制度的完善[J]. 北方论丛, 2021(6): 91-98.
|
|
[7]
|
范小华. 执行和解协议的效力分析及完善立法建议[J]. 河北法学, 2008(6): 127-130.
|
|
[8]
|
董少谋. 民事强制执行法学[M]. 第二版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016: 136.
|
|
[9]
|
金俊银. 对执行和解若干问题的探讨[J]. 法律适用, 2005(9): 34-36.
|
|
[10]
|
王利明. 论和解协议[J]. 政治与法律, 2014(1): 49-57.
|
|
[11]
|
谭行方. 论我国民事执行和解制度的完善[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 济南: 山东大学, 2018.
|
|
[12]
|
汤维建, 许尚豪. 论民事执行程序的契约化——以执行和解为分析中心[J]. 政治与法律, 2006(1): 89-97.
|
|
[13]
|
杨明. 民事执行和解制度研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2017.
|
|
[14]
|
刘东. 论民事执行和解协议效力的完善[J]. 时代法学, 2013, 11(5): 57-65.
|
|
[15]
|
郭素琴, 宫顺龙, 卢凤春. 民事执行监督与促进执行和解[J]. 中国检察官, 2011(19): 64-65.
|