“哲学无用论”的三个错误
Three Mistakes of “Philosophy Useless The-ory”
摘要: 哲学并非“无用”,实则“有用”。“哲学无用论”者犯了三个明显的错误:一是对“总体性”问题的“非总体性”回答;二是割裂了直接联系与间接联系的辩证统一;三是被实证主义和工具主义影响,将人可计算化,试图追求时时、事事的确定性。通过分析“哲学无用论”的错误,我们可以发现,哲学的用处无处不在,且深入人心。
Abstract:
Philosophy is not “useless”, but actually “useful”. The “philosophical uselessness” makes three ob-vious mistakes: first, the “non-totality” answers to the “totality” question. Second, the dialectical unity of direct connection and indirect connection is separated. Third, influenced by positivism and instrumentalism, people can be calculated, trying to pursue the certainty of everything from time to time. By analyzing the mistakes of “the uselessness of philosophy”, we can find that the useful-ness of philosophy is everywhere and deeply rooted in people’s hearts.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
苏德超. 哲学无用论为什么是错的? [J]. 四川师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2018(4): 14-21.
|
|
[2]
|
罗安宪. “有用之用”“无用之用”以及“无用”——庄子对外物态度的分析[J]. 哲学研究, 2015(7): 32-37+129.
|
|
[3]
|
朱仁官, 左亚文. 我们何以需要哲学[J]. 湖北社会科学, 2014(5): 85-97.
|
|
[4]
|
李异雷. 试论“哲学的价值”——基于罗素《哲学问题》的新思考[J]. 学理论, 2018(8): 90-91.
|
|
[5]
|
赵汀阳. 哲学怎样才是有用的[J]. 哲学动态, 1995(5): 33.
|