标准必要专利全球许可费率管辖权:扩张趋势与中国因应
Global Royalty Jurisdiction for SEPs: Expansion Trends and China Responses
摘要: 专利标准化已经成为普遍现象。为降低成本、提高效率,标准必要专利权利人和实施者往往就专利组合进行一揽子许可,在谈判无法达成时诉诸法院并请求法院裁决全球费率。由于标准必要专利对一国产业和经济发展有着重要的推动作用,部分国家法院在司法实践中积极裁决全球费率,出现管辖权扩张趋势。为避免肆意裁决全球费率引发国际争端,我国法院应当以合理行使国际裁判管辖权为基本原则,在综合考量意思自治、司法礼让以及公共政策保护的基础上,谨慎行使管辖权,公平合理地解决纠纷。
Abstract: Patent standardization has become a common phenomenon. In order to reduce legal costs and improve efficiency, SEPs owners and implementers often negotiate a blanket license for their patent portfolios, and ask the court to rule on global rates when negotiations fail. Since SEPs are important in promoting a country’s industrial and economic development, some national courts actively determine global rates in judicial practice and a trend of expanding jurisdiction appears . In order to avoid international disputes caused by the arbitrary adjudication of global rates, our courts shall, under the principle of reasonable exercise of jurisdiction, prudently exercise jurisdiction and fairly and reasonably resolve disputes on the basis of comprehensive consideration of autonomy of will, judicial comity and public policy protection.
文章引用:万雪茹. 标准必要专利全球许可费率管辖权:扩张趋势与中国因应[J]. 争议解决, 2022, 8(4): 1263-1270. https://doi.org/10.12677/DS.2022.84171

参考文献

[1] Clarivate, Demystifying the 5G Standard Essential Patent Landscape with Manual SEP: Phase 2.
https://clarivate-com-443.webvpn.bjtu.edu.cn/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2021/07/Clarivate_5G-Declared-Patent-Statistics-Report_Phase-2_June-2021_FIN.pdf
[2] 吴太轩. 技术标准化的反垄断法规制[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2011.
[3] 罗娇. 论标准必要专利诉讼的“公平、合理、无歧视”许可——内涵、费率与适用[J]. 法学家, 2015(3): 86-94.
[4] Henningsson, K. (2016) Injunctions for Standard Essential Patents under FRAND Commitment: A Balanced, Royalty-Oriented Approach. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 47, 438-469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] 吴汉东, 胡开忠. 无形财产权制度研究[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2001: 290.
[6] 邹琳. 论专利权的权利属性[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011, 35(5): 69.
[7] What Is a Standard?
https://www.iso.org/standards.html
[8] ISO/ IEC Guide 2: Standardization and Related Activities General Vocabulary, Definition 3.2.
[9] 李煜. 标准必要专利滥用的反垄断法规制研究[M]. 南京: 南京大学出版社, 2018: 5.
[10] 郑成思. 知识产权论[M]. 第3版. 北京: 法律出版社, 2003: 71-72.
[11] 徐祥. 论知识产权的地域性[J]. 武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2005(5): 604.
[12] Haedicke, M. (2022) Anti-Suit Injunctions, FRAND Policies and the Conflict between Overlapping Jurisdictions. GRUR International, 71, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 广东省高级人民法院知识产权审判庭. 通信领域标准必要专利法律问题研究[M]. 北京: 知识产权出版社, 2020: 156.
[14] 宁立志. 知识产权法[M]. 第2版. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2011: 22.
[15] 王勇. 试论法律环境对经济发展的影响[J]. 科学社会主义, 2008(2): 118.
[16] 吕岩峰. 知识产权之冲突法评论[J]. 法制与社会发展, 1996(6): 56.
[17] 单晓光. 新一轮科技革命与中国的知识产权战略[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2019(13): 27.
[18] Trimble, M. (2012) Global Patents: Limits of Transnational Enforcement. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 185-191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] WTO, Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Request for Information Pursuant to Article 63.3 of the TRIPS Agreement (Communication form the Europe to China), IP/C/W/682.
[20] EU (2022, February 18) Permanent Mission to the World Trade Organization, Request for Consultations by the European Union.
[21] 王利明. 统一合同法制订中的若干疑难问题探讨(上) [J]. 政法论坛, 1996(4): 52.
[22] 刘嘉明. 标准必要专利定价困境与出路——“法院-市场主体”二元复合解决模型的构建[J]. 法学杂志, 2021, 42(1): 127.
[23] 张鹏. 跨境知识产权侵权纠纷的民事诉讼管辖规则研究[J]. 知识产权, 2022(1): 17.
[24] 郭禾, 吕凌锐. 确定标准必要专利许可费率的Top-down方法研究——以TCL案为例[J]. 知识产权, 2019(2): 58-68.
[25] 祝建军. 标准必要专利全球许可条件的司法裁判研究[J]. 知识产权, 2022(1): 36-49.