论先秦孔子与墨家的义利观
On the Concept of Righteousness ofConfucius and Mohism in Pre-Qin Dynasty
摘要: 义利之辩是我国传统伦理学的重要问题,在先秦道德哲学与政治哲学中有着不可撼动的地位。儒家代表孔子与墨家在各自的立场上分别提出了关于义的观念,孔子倾向于“重义轻利”而墨家倾向于“义利并举”。因此,义利关系是他们思想体系的重要组成部分,区分孔子与墨家之间的义利关系有助于更好把握儒墨两家义的概念,从而对孔子与墨家的思想体系有更深刻的提示。
Abstract:
The debate of benefits and righteousness are an important issue of traditional ethics of our country, and it has an unshakable position in the pre-Qin moral philosophy and political philosophy. On be-half of Confucianism and Mohism, they put forward the concept of righteousness in their respective positions. Confucius tends to “value righteousness over profit” while Mohism tends to “combine justice with profit”. Therefore, the relationship between benefits and righteousness are an im-portant part of their ideological system. Distinguishing the relationship between benefits and righteousness between Confucius and Mohism is helpful for us to understand the concept of Confu-cianism and Mohismdeeply, and thus to have a deeper understanding of their ideological systems.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
申绪璐. 先秦义观念述论[J]. 儒学与文明, 2016(1): 157-168.
|
|
[2]
|
房占元. “義”字含义浅析[J]. 新乡学院学报: 社会科学版, 2009(3): 148-150.
|
|
[3]
|
谷衍奎. 汉字源流字典[M]. 北京: 华夏出版社, 2003.
|
|
[4]
|
许慎. 说文解字[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1996.
|
|
[5]
|
刘熙. 《释名》卷四《释言语第十二》[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 1985: 52.
|
|
[6]
|
冯友兰, 涂又光. 中国哲学简史[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2013.
|
|
[7]
|
高庆年. 论孔子的义利观及其现代转换[J]. 孔子研究, 1997(3): 13-20.
|
|
[8]
|
钱逊. 《论语》读本[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2007.
|
|
[9]
|
黄济. 再谈如何看待“国学热” ? [J]. 中国教育学刊, 2008(1): 22-26.
|
|
[10]
|
陈来, 李存山, 陈卫平, 秦彦士, 杨武金. 儒墨关系的现代诠释(笔谈) [J]. 文史哲, 2021(4): 13-40.
|
|
[11]
|
张国钧. 儒墨义利论比较[J]. 哲学动态, 1994(7): 38.
|
|
[12]
|
孙以楷. 墨子全译[M]. 成都: 巴蜀书社, 2000.
|