营商环境与企业投资回报率研究——基于模糊集定性比较分析
Research on Business Environment and Enterprise Return on Investment—By Using Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2022.1112926, PDF,   
作者: 姚 良：贵州大学管理学院，贵州 贵阳；梁培林*：广西鹿鼎林业集团有限责任公司，广西 柳州
关键词: 营商环境模糊集；定性比较分析(fsQCA)；投资回报率；Business Environment Fuzzy Set； Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA)； ROI
摘要: 在复杂因素背景下，营商环境的外部因素对企业投资回报率的影响程度逐渐提高，但现有文献并不足以对这一现象提供系统的检验和理论解析。QCA作为一种新兴方法，能够将营商环境和企业实际经营效益的研究结合起来，构建外部营商环境与企业投资回报率增长的理论模型，从而捕捉投资回报率的外在影响因素。本文通过收集调查问卷数据，实证研究显示：存在着3种营商环境组态，代表着不同的高投资回报率的实现方式。此外，引入制度组态视角，探究营商环境生态要素耦合对于企业投资回报率的影响，研究揭示了营商环境生态要素耦合对企业投资效益的深刻意义，以及改善制度环境对于推动企业良性发展的价值。
Abstract: In the context of complex factors, the external factors of business environment have gradually in-creased their impact on the rate of return on investment of enterprises, but the existing literature is not enough to provide a systematic test and theoretical analysis of this phenomenon. As a new method, QCA can combine the research of business environment and the actual operating efficiency of enterprises, build a theoretical model of external business environment and the growth of enterprise return on investment, so as to capture the external factors affecting the return on investment. Through the collection of questionnaire data, the empirical study shows that there are three business environment configurations, representing different ways to achieve high ROI. In ad-dition, from the perspective of institutional configuration, the study explored the impact of business environment ecological element coupling on the return on investment of enterprises, revealed the profound significance of business environment ecological element coupling on enterprise in-vestment benefits, and the value of improving the institutional environment for promoting the be-nign development of enterprises.
文章引用：姚良, 梁培林. 营商环境与企业投资回报率研究——基于模糊集定性比较分析[J]. 应用数学进展, 2022, 11(12): 8792-8802. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2022.1112926

参考文献

[1] 钱苹, 张帏. 我国创业投资的回报率及其影响因素[J]. 经济研究, 2007, 42(5): 78-90.
[2] 刘兴国. 中国企业平均寿命为什么短[N]. 经济日报, 2016-06-01(09).
[3] 李志军, 张世国, 李逸飞, 单珊. 中国城市营商环境评价及有关建议[J]. 江苏社会科学, 2019(2): 30-42+257.
[4] Lim, D.S.K., Morse, E.A., Mitchell, R.K. and Seawright, K.K. (2010) Institutional Environment and Entrepreneurial Cognitions: A Comparative Business Systems Perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 491-516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[5] Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., et al. (2011) In-stitutional Complexity and Organizational Responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 317-371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[6] 郑馨, 周先波, 陈宏辉, 杨甜. 东山再起: 怎样的国家制度设计能够促进失败再创业?——基于56个国家7年混合数据的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(7): 136-151+181.
[7] Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V.F., et al. (2020) Capturing Causal Complexity: Heuristics for Configurational Theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 46, 778-799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[8] Douglas, E.J., Shepherd, D.A. and Prentice, C. (2020) Using Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis for a Finer-Grained Understanding of Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 35, Article ID: 105970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[9] Ragin, C.C. (2008) Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis to Study Causal Order. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 431-441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[10] Moore, J.F. (1993) Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 71, 75-86.
[11] Korner, P., Kudrna, Z. and Vychodil, O. (2002) Measuring Business Environment Quality in Central Europe. Finance AUVER, 52, 674-697.
[12] Bradley, S.W., Shepherd, D.A. and Wiklund, J. (2011) The Importance of Slack for New Organizations Facing “Tough” Environments. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1071-1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[13] Thornton, P.H. and Ocasio, W. (2008) Institutional Logics. In: Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin-Andersson, K. and Suddaby, R., Eds., The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Sage, London, 99-129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[14] Elif, A. (2011) Economic Policies and FDI Inflows to Emerging Market Economies. IMF Working Papers, 2011(192). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[15] 李成, 施文泼. 世界银行纳税营商环境指标体系研究[J]. 厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(5): 118-130.
[16] 宋林霖, 何成祥. 优化营商环境视阈下放管服改革的逻辑与推进路径——基于世界银行营商环境指标体系的分析[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018(4): 67-72.
[17] 夏后学, 谭清美, 白俊红. 营商环境、企业寻租与市场创新——来自中国企业营商环境调查的经验证据[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(4): 84-98.
[18] 崔鑫生. “一带一路”沿线国家营商环境对经济发展的影响——基于世界银行营商环境指标体系的分析[J]. 北京工商大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 35(3): 37-48.
[19] “中国城市营商环境评价研究”课题组, 李志军, 张世国, 牛志伟, 袁文融, 刘琪. 中国城市营商环境评价的理论逻辑、比较分析及对策建议[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5): 98-112+8.
[20] 杜运周, 刘秋辰, 程建青. 什么样的营商环境生态产生城市高创业活跃度?——基于制度组态的分析[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9): 141-155.
[21] 刘晓亮, 侯凯悦, 张洺硕. 从地方探索到中央推广: 政府创新扩散的影响机制——基于36个案例的清晰集定性比较分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2019, 16(3): 157-167+176.
[22] 魏玮, 张兵. 中国投资回报率的国际比较及启示[J]. 企业经济, 2020, 39(10): 111-120.
[23] Gugler, K., Mueller, D.C. and Yurtoglu, B.B. (2004) Corporate Governance and the Returns on In-vestment. Journal of Law and Economics, 47, 589-633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[24] Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. (1999) The Corporate Cost of Capital and the Return on Corporate Investment. The Journal of Finance, 54, 1939-1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[25] Gugler, K., Mueller, D.C. and Yurtoglu, B.B. (2003) The Impact of Corporate Governance on Investment Returns in Developed and Developing Countries. The Economic Journal, 113, 511-539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[26] Cull, R. and Xu, L.C. (2005) Institutions, Ownership, and Finance: The Determinants of Profit Reinvestment among Chinese Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 77, 117-146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[27] 张勋, 徐建国. 中国资本回报率的再测算[J]. 世界经济, 2014, 37(8): 3-23.
[28] 辛清泉, 林斌, 杨德明. 中国资本投资回报率的估算和影响因素分析——1999-2004年上市公司的经验[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2007(4): 1143-1164.
[29] 郭春娜. 制造业资本回报率的省际差异及收敛性研究[J]. 重庆大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 26(6): 69-79.
[30] 黄晶. 资本回报率、人力资本投资与收入不平等——基于Galor-Zeira模型的扩展[J]. 商业研究, 2020(3): 113-121.
[31] Whitley, R. (1999) Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business. Oxford University Press, New York, 88-95.
[32] Miller, D. (1986) Configurations of Strategy and Structure: Towards a Synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 233-249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[33] Abbott, A. and Ragin, C.C. (2001) Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Con-temporary Sociology, 30, 331-334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[34] 杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA): 管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017, 33(6): 155-167.
[35] Rihoux, B. and Ragin, C.C. (2009) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Technique. SAGE, London, 38-48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[36] 谭海波, 范梓腾, 杜运周. 技术管理能力、注意力分配与地方政府网站建设——一项基于TOE框架的组态分析[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(9): 81-94.
[37] Ford, J.D. and Schellenberg, D.A. (1982) Conceptual Issues of Linkage in the Assessment of Organizational Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 7, 49-58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[38] Fiss, P.C. (2011) Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 393-420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[39] Lim, D.S.K., Oh, C.H. and De Clercq, D. (2016) En-gagement in Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies: Interactive Effects of Individual-Level Factors and Institutional Conditions. International Business Review, 25, 933-945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[40] Covin, J.G. and Wales, W.J. (2019) Crafting High-Impact En-trepreneurial Orientation Research: Some Suggested Guidelines. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43, 3-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[41] Dul, J., van der Laan, E. and Kuik, R. (2020) A Statistical Sig-nificance Test for Necessary Condition Analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 23, 385-395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] 
[42] Vis, B. and Dul, J. (2018) Analyzing Relationships of Necessity Not Just in Kind but Also in Degree: Complementing fsQCA With NCA. Sociological Methods & Research, 47, 872-899.

为你推荐