比亚迪公司企业估值及其风险研究
Research on BYD’s Corporate Valuation and Risk
DOI: 10.12677/AAM.2022.1112944, PDF,  被引量   
作者: 闫勇志:上海理工大学管理学院,上海
关键词: 公司估值FCFF模型GARCH-VaR模型KMV模型Company Valuation FCFF Model GARCH-VaR Model KMV Model
摘要: 发展新能源科技是缓解能源短缺的关键举措,也是实现碳中和目标的内在要求。对新能源企业合理估值及研究企业面临的金融风险,能够帮助企业实现最大化管理。首先从财务角度分析比亚迪企业面临的风险,其次采用FCFF和P/E模型对比亚迪企业进行估值,最后用GARCH-VaR和KMV模型度量目标企业的金融风险。研究发现:1) 比亚迪公司近两年的盈利能力有所提高;偿债能力较差,有偿债风险;企业具有一定的发展潜力,但是投资风险较大。2) FCFF模型很可能高估比亚迪公司企业价值而P/E模型很可能低估比亚迪公司企业价值。3) 比亚迪企业2019年以后市场风险逐渐增加,但是几乎不会发生违约风险。
Abstract: The development of new energy technology is a key measure to alleviate energy shortage, and is al-so an internal requirement to achieve the goal of carbon neutrality. Reasonable valuation of new energy enterprises and research on financial risks faced by enterprises can help enterprises achieve maximum management. First, analyze the risks faced by BYD enterprises from the financial perspective, then use FCFF and P/E models to evaluate BYD enterprises, and finally use GARCH-VaR and KMV models to measure the financial risks of the target enterprises. The research finds that: 1) The profitability of BYD has improved in recent two years; poor debt paying ability, with debt pay-ing risk; the enterprise has certain development potential, but the investment risk is high. 2) The FCFF model is likely to overestimate the enterprise value of BYD and the P/E model is likely to un-derestimate the enterprise value of BYD. 3) After 2019, the market risk of BYD enterprises will gradually increase, but there will be almost no default risk.
文章引用:闫勇志. 比亚迪公司企业估值及其风险研究[J]. 应用数学进展, 2022, 11(12): 8947-8961. https://doi.org/10.12677/AAM.2022.1112944

参考文献

[1] Damodaran, A. (2015) Equity Discounted Cash Flow Models. In: Damodaran, A., Ed., Damodaran on Valuation, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken.
[2] Sutjipto, E., Setiawan, W. and Ghozali, I. (2020) Determination of Intrinsic Value: Dividend Discount Model and Discounted Cash Flow Methods in Indonesia Stock Exchange. International Journal of Management, 11, 1842-1852.
[3] 孙璐璐. 中科曙光企业投资价值分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 兰州: 西北民族大学, 2021.
[4] 李亚男. 基于哈佛分析框架的比亚迪公司财务分析研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2021.[CrossRef
[5] Vrbka, J. and Vitková, P. (2021) The Applicability of FCFF Method Evaluating an Enterprise of Real Estate Segment. SHS Web of Conferences, 91, Article ID: 01042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] 陈萌. 基于自由现金流量法的比亚迪企业价值评估研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 郑州: 中原工学院, 2021.[CrossRef
[7] 王培培. 新能源科技汽车行业的估值研究[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 贵阳: 贵州财经大学, 2022.
[8] 李佳, 陈冬兰. 我国保险股市场风险度量的比较研究——来自VaR-GARCH族模型的证据[J]. 生产力研究, 2018(11): 51-55+124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Guo, Z.-Y. (2022) Risk Management of Bitcoin Fu-tures with GARCH Models. Finance Research Letters, 45, Article ID: 102197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] 杨馥, 叶羲舒. 基于GARCH-VaR模型的保险公司市场风险度量研究——以R保险公司为例[J]. 保险职业学院学报, 2021, 35(4): 15-20.
[11] Xia, T. and Yang, J.X. (2022) Per-formance Evaluation Method of Online Supply Chain Finance Logistics Enterprises Based on GARCH-VAR. Security and Communication Networks, 2022, Article ID: 4500430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Tomas, K., Misankova, M. and Kocisova, K. (2015) Calculation of Distance to Default. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 238-243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 卢茜, 高丽. 基于KMV模型对上市企业信用违约风险度量的研究[J]. 科技与经济, 2021, 34(4): 106-110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] 郭立仑, 周升起. 商业银行信用风险主要影响因素来自内部还是外部?——基于KMV及随机森林模型的实证研究[J]. 会计与经济研究, 2022, 36(1): 105-124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef