消费金融下供应链运营策略研究
Research on the Decision-Making of Supply Chain Entities Led by E-Commerce Platforms Considering Consumer Finance
DOI: 10.12677/MSE.2022.114083, PDF,    国家自然科学基金支持
作者: 吴 媚, 王志宏*:东华大学旭日工商管理学院,上海
关键词: 供应链融资消费金融电商平台资金约束Supply Chain Financing Consumer Finance E-Commerce Platform Capital Constraints
摘要: 将消费金融与供应链金融相结合,基于消费者效用理论,构建电商平台作为主导者的三级供应链系统的博弈模型,分析了银行、供应商、电商三个主体的最优决策方案。研究发现:供应商有无资金约束时最主要的不同在于适用的利率不同,当银行利率等于无风险利率时,无论供应商是否存在资金约束,电商平台的最优决策是一定的。加入消费金融作为考量因素后,当分期付款违约率在一定范围内时,电商平台的利润空间增加,供应商的利润占比减小。数值分析结果显示最优零售价格敏感系数随着缺陷率的增加先大后小,最优批发价格敏感系数随着缺陷率的增大先小后大;顾客分期付款履约率与最佳零售价格反向变化;最优批发价格w关于Rd的敏感系数大于最优零售价格p关于Rd的敏感系数。
Abstract: Based on the theory of consumer utility, we combine consumer finance with supply chain finance and build a game model of three-tier supply chain system with e-commerce platform as the leader, analyzing the optimal decision-making scheme of banks, suppliers and e-commerce. The study found that the main difference between suppliers with or without funding constraints is that the supplier’s profit structure is different and the applicable interest rates are different. When the bank interest rate is equal to the risk-free interest rate, regardless of whether the supplier has funding constraints, the retailer’s optimal decision is certain. Through numerical analysis, it is found that the optimal retail price sensitivity coefficient first increases and then decreases with the increase of the defect rate, and the optimal wholesale price sensitivity coefficient first decreases and then increases with the increase of the defect rate; the customer installment performance rate is inverse to the best retail price. The sensitivity coefficient of the optimal wholesale price w with respect to Rd is greater than the sensitivity coefficient of the optimal retail price p with respect to Rd.
文章引用:吴媚, 王志宏. 消费金融下供应链运营策略研究[J]. 管理科学与工程, 2022, 11(4): 701-718. https://doi.org/10.12677/MSE.2022.114083

参考文献

[1] Alessio, R., Antonella, M. and Federico, C. (2021) A Decision Framework for Inventory- and Equipment-Based Supply Chain Finance Solutions. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 27, Article ID: 100712.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[2] Niu, B.Z., Zeng, F.Z. and Liu, Y.Q. (2021) Firms’ Introduction of Internet-Based Installment: Incremental Demand vs. Cash Opportunity Cost. Transportation Research Part E, 152, Article ID: 102277.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Moretto, A., Grassi, L., Caniato, F., et al. (2019) Supply Chain Finance: From Traditional to Supply Chain Credit Rating. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 25, 197-217.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[4] Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Sallam, K. and Elhoseny, M. (2020) A Novel Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supply Chain Finance under Uncertainty Environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, Article ID: 122324.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[5] Michela, G., Maria, M.A. and Francesco, A.C.F. (2021) How to Select a Supply Chain Finance Solution? Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 27, Article ID: 100701.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[6] Giovanna, L.N., Giovanni, F. and Lorenzo, A. (2021) Supply Chain Finance: The Role of Credit Rating and Retailer Effort on Optimal Contracts. International Journal of Production Economics, 240, Article ID: 108235.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[7] Lai, G.M., Debo, L.G. and Sycara, K. (2008) Sharing Inventory Risk in Supply Chain: The Implication of Financial Constraint. Omega, 37, 811-825.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[8] Oussama, K., Tarik, A., Tarik, Z. and Meriem, D. (2021) Dynamic Lot-Sizing with Short-Term Financing and External Deposits for A Capital-Constrained Manufacturer. International Journal of Production Economics, 242, Article ID: 108281.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[9] Chen, M.J. and Matousek, R. (2019) Do Productive Firms Get External Finance? Evidence from Chinese Listed Manufacturing Firms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 67, Article ID: 101422.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[10] Karpavičius, S. and Yu, F. (2019) External Growth Opportunities and a Firm’s Financing Policy. International Review of Economics and Finance, 62, 287-308.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] Jiang, Z.-Z., Feng, G.Q. and Yi, Z.L. (2021) How Should a Capital-Constrained Servicizing Manufacturer Search for Financing? The Impact of Supply Chain Leadership. Transportation Research Part E, 145, Article ID: 102162.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Shi, J., Li, Q., Chu, L.K. and Shi, Y. (2021) Effects of Demand Uncertainty Reduction on the Selection of Financing Approach in a Capital-Constrained Supply Chain. Transportation Research Part E, 148, Article ID: 102266.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] Luo, Y., Wei, Q., Ling, Q.H. and Huo, B.F. (2020) Optimal Decision in a Green Supply Chain: Bank Financing or Supplier Financing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, Article ID: 122090.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[14] Tseng, M.-L., Wu, K.-J., Hu, J.Y. and Wang, C.-H. (2018) Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supply Chain Finance under Uncertainties. International Journal of Production Economics, 205, 30-36.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[15] Lariviere, M.A. and Porteus, E.L. (2001) Selling to the Newsvendor: An Analysis of Price-Only Contracts. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 3, 293-305.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[16] Ghosh, D. and Shah, J. (2015) Supply Chain Analysis under Green Sensitive Consumer Demand and Cost Sharing Contract. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 319-329.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[17] Xia, N. and Rajagopalan, S. (2009) Standard vs. Custom Products: Variety, Lead Time, and Price Competition. Marketing Science, 28, 887.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[18] 王建华, 侯爱娇. 考虑消费者社会责任偏好的供应链策略研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2021, 51(12): 42-54.
[19] 于晓辉, 李敏, 叶兆兴. 基于竞合博弈节能补贴对双渠道低碳供应链决策影响分析[J]. 模糊系统与数学, 2021, 35(2): 153-166.
[20] Akçay, Y., Natarajan, H.P. and Xu, S.H. (2010) Joint Dynamic Pricing of Multiple Perishable Products under Consumer Choice. Management Science, 56, 1345-1361.
[Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[21] 纪雅杰, 马德青, 胡劲松. 供应商管理库存下基于消费者行为偏好的全渠道运营策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 82-96.
[22] 汤婷, 徐海燕, 张智超. 不同融资模式下线上双渠道供应链运营策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 2(1): 1-11.
[23] 经有国, 王迪, 秦开大, 杨红娟. 卖方消费信贷下零售商与金融企业的成本共担契约[J]. 系统管理学报, 2020, 29(5): 1011-1017.
[24] 陈中洁, 于辉. 产能过剩下“京东白条”的供应链模型分析[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2019, 39(5): 773-789.
[25] 王迪, 周永生. 卖方消费信贷下基于扩展报童模型的收益共享契约协调[J]. 价值工程, 2017, 36(26): 105-110.
[26] 李怡娜, 陈冲. 基于顾客选择行为的提前期和价格响应模式[J]. 系统工程学报, 2016, 31(4): 460-470.
[27] 黄甫, 宋华明, 杨慧, 张哲, 吴佳伟, 吕一帆. 考虑消费者退货的双渠道订货量决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4): 33-39.
[28] 白世贞, 陶阳红, 鄢章华. 信用支付下基于收益共享契约的网购供应链协调策略研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(7): 44-54.
[29] 金伟, 骆建文. 基于双边资金约束供应链的均衡组合融资策略[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(6): 1441-1451.