论我国民事判决瑕疵更正制度及其完善
On the System of Correction of Defects in Civil Judgments in China and Its Improvement
摘要: 作为民事审判程序的最终环节,民事裁判关系到民事诉讼目的的实现。裁判文书承载着司法公正的价值理念,裁判文书质量的优劣体现了一个国家法治文明的先进与否,因而裁判文书的重要性已不言而喻,但是基于实践中各种因素的影响,民事判决的瑕疵难以避免地存在于司法实践中,且我国现行法律规范对于民事判决瑕疵的更正程序规定并不完善,存在许多问题。因此,探寻民事判决瑕疵更正的机制具有十分重要的理论和实践意义。在我国法治进程着力推行的当下,必须充分考虑制度的局限与实务的缺漏,完善瑕疵更正程序,从制度的适用范围、程序的定位、程序的运作等方面展开。
Abstract:
As the final link of civil trial procedure, civil judgment is related to the realization of the purpose of civil litigation. Judicial documents carry the value concept of judicial justice. The quality of judicial documents reflects the advancement of a country’s legal civilization. Therefore, the importance of judicial documents is self-evident. However, based on the influence of various factors in practice, the defects of civil judgments inevitably exist in judicial practice. And the current legal norms of our country for the correction procedure of civil judgment defects are not perfect, there are many problems. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to explore the mechanism of civil judgment defect correction. At the moment of the implementation of the rule of law in China, we must fully consider the limitations of the system and the deficiencies of practice, improve the defect correction procedure, and carry out it from the aspects of the scope of application of the system, the positioning of the procedure, the operation of the procedure and so on.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
祁若冰, 卢玉振. 民事判决的瑕疵[J]. 山东行政学院山东省经济管理干部学院学报, 2004(4): 85-87.
|
|
[2]
|
胡夏冰. 裁判表述错误及其补正[J]. 法律适用, 2009(10): 70-73.
|
|
[3]
|
曹书瑜. 论民事瑕疵裁判的补正程序[J]. 人民司法, 2006(6): 58-61.
|
|
[4]
|
杜睿哲. 论裁判脱漏及其程序上的处理[J]. 甘肃政法学院学报, 2008(3): 104-108.
|
|
[5]
|
刘荣军. 民事诉讼行为瑕疵及其处理[J]. 中国法学, 1999(3): 111-118.
|
|
[6]
|
占善刚. 民事判决中的表示错误及其更正[J]. 法学, 2017(8): 164-173.
|
|
[7]
|
陈晓君. 缺陷的弥补与权利的补充救济民事裁判瑕疵补正程序[J]. 法律适用, 2008(9): 46-49.
|
|
[8]
|
王以. 民事裁判错误问题研究——以法律救济为视角[J]. 河南科技大学学报, 2007, 25(5): 99-102.
|
|
[9]
|
姜启波. 论法官判后答疑[J]. 法律适用, 2006(8): 55-58.
|