大学生任务失败后的酸葡萄效应
The Sour Grapes Effect on Undergraduates after Mission Failure
DOI: 10.12677/AP.2023.131007, PDF,    科研立项经费支持
作者: 康 佳, 杨博茜, 冯萌萌：天津师范大学心理学部，天津；都 旭：遵义师范学院，贵州 遵义；白学军*：天津师范大学心理学部，天津；教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院，天津
关键词: 酸葡萄效应；任务失败；大学生；Sour Grapes Effect； Mission Failure； Undergraduates
摘要: 酸葡萄效应是指个体失败后贬低目标的现象。为考察个体经历失败后的酸葡萄效应，本研究以54名大学生为被试，采用部件组字任务探究个体失败前、后对目标态度的转变。结果发现，任务失败后，个体对心理协会的评价、成功进入心理协会的幸福感预期以及加入心理协会的动机强度得分均低于任务前。表明大学生经历失败后，在认知、情绪和行为倾向上均会产生酸葡萄效应。
Abstract: The sour grapes effect refers to the phenomenon of individuals devaluing goals after failure. In order to examine the sour grapes effect after individuals experienced academic setbacks, this study used 54 undergraduates as subjects to explore the change in attitude towards the target before and after failure using an anagram task. The results showed that after failure of the task, the scores of individuals’ evaluations of the psychological association, their expectation of happiness in successfully entering the psychological association, and their motivational intensity for joining the psychological association were lower than those before the task. The result reveals that after undergraduates experience failure, there will be sour grapes effect on cognitive, affect and behavior tendency.
文章引用：康佳, 都旭, 杨博茜, 冯萌萌, 白学军 (2023). 大学生任务失败后的酸葡萄效应. 心理学进展, 13(1), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.12677/AP.2023.131007

参考文献

[1] 都旭, 白学军, 刘颖, 郝嘉佳(2021). 成功经历能改善低耐挫大学生的挫折心理. 心理科学, 44(5), 1216-1223.
[2] 方鸿志, 李红霞, 白玲(2013). 大学生挫折感影响因素的实证研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 21(5), 749-751.
[3] 刘明妍, 吴师, 王妍, 张馨心, 杨娟(2017). 自我威胁与防御: 自尊的调节作用. 心理技术与应用, 5(1), 43-51.
[4] 徐音奇, 展艳茹, 门芯宇, 魏祥迁, 韩磊(2021). 自我形象受威胁对风险决策的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 29(5), 923-925+961.
[5] 闫淑楠, 边和平(2016). 大学新生学习挫折分析及其引导策略. 江苏经贸职业技术学院学报, (1), 60-64.
[6] 伊索(2018). 伊索寓言(周作人, 译). 浙江文艺出版社.
[7] Aronson, E. (1999). Dissonance, Hypocrisy, and the Self-Concept. In E. Harmon-Jones, & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive Dissonance: Progress on a Pivotal Theory in Social Psychology (pp. 103-126). American Psychological Association.[CrossRef] 
[8] Baron, R. A., Byrnt, D., & Suls, J. (1988). Exploring Social Psychology (3th ed., pp. 79-82). Allyn and Bacon.
[9] Beasley, R. K., & Joslyn, M. R. (2001). Cognitive Dissonance and Post-Decision Attitude Change in Six Presidential Elections. Political Psychology, 22, 521-540.[CrossRef] 
[10] Bruckner, D.W. (2009). In Defense of Adaptive Preferences. Philosophical Studies, 142, 307-324.[CrossRef] 
[11] Cook, J. E., & Attari, S. Z. (2012). Paying for What Was Free: Lessons from the New York Times Paywall. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 15, 682-687.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] Deci, E., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. (1999). A Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-688.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[13] DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Chester, D. S., & Bushman, B. J. (2016). How Often Does Currently Felt Emotion Predict Social Behavior and Judgment? A Meta-Analytic Test of Two Theories. Emotion Review, 8, 136-143.[CrossRef] 
[14] Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal Strivings: An Approach to Personality and Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1058.[CrossRef] 
[15] Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive Consequences of Forced Compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Jussim, L., Yen, H. J., & Aiello, J. R. (1995). Self-Consistency, Self-Enhancement, and Accuracy in Reactions to Feedback. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 322-356.[CrossRef] 
[17] Khader, S. J. (2009). Adaptive Preferences and Procedural Autonomy. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, (10), 169-187.[CrossRef] 
[18] Miloyan, B., & Suddendorf, T. (2015). Feelings of the Future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 196-200.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[19] Pyszczynski, T. (1982). Cognitive Strategies for Coping with Uncertain Outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 16, 386-399.[CrossRef] 
[20] Sjåstad, H., Baumeister, R., & Ent, M. (2020). Greener Grass or Sour Grapes? How People Value Future Goals after Initial Failure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 88, Article ID: 103965.[CrossRef] 
[21] Smyth, A. P. J., Peetz, J., & Capaldi, A. A. (2020). Ex-Appraisal Bias: Negative Illusions in Appraising Relationship Quality Retrospectively. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37, 1673-1680.[CrossRef] 
[22] vanDellen, M. R., Campbell, W. K., Hoyle, R. H., & Bradfield, E. K. (2011). Compensating, Resisting, and Breaking: A Meta-Analytic Examination of Reactions to Self-Esteem Threat. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 51-74.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] Vinckier, F., Rigoux, L., Kurniawan, I. T., Hu, C., Bourgeois-Gironde, S., Daunizeau, J. et al. (2019). Sour Grapes and Sweet Victories: How Actions Shape Preferences. PLoS Computational Biology, 15, e1006499.[CrossRef] [PubMed]
[24] Wilson, T. D., Wheatley, T., Kurtz, J., Dunn, E., & Gilbert, D. T. (2004). When to Fire: Anticipatory versus Postevent Reconstrual of Uncontrollable Events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 340-351.[CrossRef] [PubMed]