经剑突下单孔与经肋间手术治疗前纵隔肿瘤效果对比——Meta分析
Comparison of the Efficacy of Thoracoscopic Resection via Subxiphoid Single-Foramen Approach and via Intercostal Approach for Anterior Mediastinal Tumors—Meta Analysis
摘要: 目的:本研究采用荟萃分析评价经剑突下单孔胸腔镜手术与经肋间胸腔镜手术治疗前纵隔肿瘤的效果。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science、CNKI、VIP、WanFang数据库,搜集行剑突下单孔入路或肋间入路胸腔镜手术治疗前纵隔肿瘤的随机对照试验和队列研究,检索时限为建库至2022年11月,采用StataSE 15进行Meta分析并绘制相关图表。结果:纳入了9项研究,共涉及AMT手术患者550例,所有研究均发表于2017年至2022年之间。分析结果显示:两种术式在手术时间方面没有显著统计学差异,剑突下单孔入路组对比肋间入路组显著减少或降低了术中出血量、术后引流量、术后引流管留置时间、术后24小时和48小时疼痛评分、住院时间以及术后并发症的发生率。另外还对其中的术后并发症方面进行了更为细致的亚组分析,结果显示剑突下单孔入路组术后肺不张和肺部感染的发生率显著低于肋间入路组,而在术后心律失常方面两组术式间没有显著统计学差异。结论:除手术时间方面,剑突下单孔入路胸腔镜手术治疗前纵隔肿瘤相较于肋间入路术式,在各疗效指标上均显示出了明显的优势,并且当手术医生对手术有一定熟练度后,手术时间也可明显缩短体现出优势,说明剑突下单孔入路胸腔镜手术是安全可行的,值得进一步推广和研究。
Abstract: Objective: This study used a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of thoracoscopic resection via subxiphoid single-foramen approach and via intercostal approach in the treatment of anterior me-diastinal tumors. Methods: The database of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP and Wan Fang were searched by computer to collect the randomized controlled trial and cohort study of thoracoscopic surgery for anterior mediastinal tumors through subxiphoid single-foramen approach and intercostal approach. The retrieval time limit is from the establishment of the data-base to November 2022. This paper uses StataSE 15 to conduct meta-analysis and draw relevant charts. Results: Nine studies were included, involving 550 patients with AMT surgery, all of which were published between 2017 and 2022. The analysis results showed that there was no significant statistical difference between the two operation methods in terms of operation time. Compared with the intercostal approach group, the subxiphoid single-foramen approach group significantly re-duced the amount of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage flow, postoperative drainage tube retention time, postoperative pain score 24 hours and 48 hours, hospital stay and the inci-dence of postoperative complications. In addition, a more detailed subgroup analysis of postopera-tive complications was carried out. The results showed that the incidence of postoperative atelecta-sis and pulmonary infection in the subxiphoid single-foramen approach group was significantly lower than that in the intercostal approach group, while there was no significant statistical differ-ence between the two groups in terms of postoperative arrhythmia. Conclusion: In addition to the operation time, compared with intercostal approach, thoracoscopic resection via subxiphoid sin-gle-foramen approach in the treatment of anterior mediastinal tumors shows obvious advantages in terms of various therapeutic indicators, and when the surgeon has a certain degree of proficiency in surgery, the operation time can also be significantly shortened, reflecting the advantages, indicating that the subxiphoid single-foramen approach for thoracoscopic surgery is safe and feasible, and is worth further promotion and research.
文章引用:李鑫, 张雪, 李超. 经剑突下单孔与经肋间手术治疗前纵隔肿瘤效果对比——Meta分析[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(1): 452-466. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.131068

参考文献

[1] 王伟, 杜宁, 刘嘉文, 等. 电视胸腔镜下纵隔肿瘤切除术中膈神经保护的临床效果[J]. 山东医药, 2017, 57(28): 97-98.
[2] 章恒, 简俊岭, 王起奎, 等. 胸腔镜手术和开胸手术治疗纵隔肿瘤的对比研究[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2018, 23(9): 1593-1595.
[3] Mineo, T.C. and Ambrogi, V. (2019) Surgical Techniques for Myasthenia Gravis: Vid-eo-Assisted Thoracic Surgery. Thoracic Surgery Clinics, 29, 165-175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Furukawa, T., Sakai, K., Higashi, M., et al. (2019) Thoraco-scopic Resection for Mediastinal Thymolipoma in a Child. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 12, 218-221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Zielinski, M., Czajkowski, W., Gwozdz, P., et al. (2013) Resection of Thymomas with Use of the New Minimally-Invasive Technique of Extended Thymectomy Performed through the Subxiphoid-Right Video-Thoracoscopic Approach with Double Elevation of the Sternum. European Journal of Car-dio-Thoracic Surgery, 44, e113-e119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Mao, Y., Lan, Y., Cui, F., et al. (2020) Comparison of Different Surgical Approaches for Anterior Mediastinal Tumor. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 12, 5430-5439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Yano, M., Moriyama, S., Haneda, H., et al. (2017) The Subxiphoid Ap-proach Leads to Less Invasive Thoracoscopic Thymectomy than the Lateral Approach. World Journal of Surgery, 41, 763-770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[8] 梁宝磊, 魏豪, 石珂, 等. 剑突下入路与侧胸入路胸腔镜手术治疗纵隔肿瘤近期疗效和安全性Meta分析[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2019, 6(2): 115-124.
[9] 梁少杰, 李德冰, 路遥, 等. 剑突下与侧胸入路胸腔镜手术治疗胸腺瘤效果的Meta分析[J]. 安徽医药, 2021, 25(9): 1701-1707.
[10] 吴鑫. 剑突下与肋间入路胸腔镜手术胸腺切除疗效评价的Meta分析[D]: [硕士学位论文]. 延吉: 延边大学, 2021.
[11] Wang, H., Wang, M., Xin, N., et al. (2022) Effect Evaluation of Subxiphoid and Intercostal Thymectomy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Frontiers in Surgery, 9, Article ID: 925003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[12] 方泽民, 王跃斌, 丁志丹, 等. 剑突下单孔胸腔镜手术在前纵隔肿瘤治疗中的应用[J]. 河南医学研究, 2018, 27(5): 890-891.
[13] 何中杰, 韦泽, 庞靖. 前纵隔肿瘤手术治疗方式的比较[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2020, 37(6): 1162-1163.
[14] 李晓亮, 刘高华, 刘蔡杨, 等. 不同入路胸腔镜手术治疗前纵隔肿瘤的临床疗效比较[J]. 成都医学院学报, 2021, 16(6): 743-746.
[15] 林经纬. 前纵隔肿瘤切除患者应用剑突下单孔胸腔镜手术对并发症和安全性的效果研究[J]. 中外医学研究, 2019, 17(30): 3-5.
[16] 裴登科, 孔德淼, 罗猛. 层面解剖技术在剑突下单孔胸腔镜前上纵隔肿瘤切除术中的应用[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2019, 35(12): 1850-1852.
[17] 宋绪洋, 孙琰, 刘阳. 剑突下胸腔镜手术在前纵隔肿瘤切除患者中的有效性和安全性分析[J]. 医学信息, 2022, 35(14): 89-91.
[18] 杨勇坡. 剑突下单孔胸腔镜手术治疗前纵隔肿瘤的效果[J]. 实用中西医结合临床, 2019, 19(7): 95-96.
[19] 袁江, 张永学, 高兆明. 剑突下单孔胸腔镜与三孔胸腔镜前纵隔肿瘤切除的临床疗效对比[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2017, 37(15): 3815-3817.
[20] 祝沪军, 王岳峰, 杨鹏, 等. 剑突下单孔胸腔镜技术治疗前纵隔肿瘤与传统外科手术方法的效果比较[J]. 哈尔滨医科大学学报, 2018, 52(2): 163-166+169.
[21] 杨盛荣. 经剑突下胸腔镜手术研究进展[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2020, 36(10): 1519-1521.
[22] Xu, H., Liu, D., Li, Y., et al. (2020) The Outcomes of Subxiphoid Thoracoscopic versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery for Thymic Diseases. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques A, 30, 508-513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[23] 陈舒晨, 余绍斌, 林济红, 等. 经剑突下入路胸腔镜下前纵隔肿瘤切除术学习曲线分析[J]. 福建医科大学学报, 2017, 51(5): 311-315.
[24] 朱炬, 陈焕文, 刘蔡杨, 等. 经剑突下路径胸腔镜下全胸腺切除术学习曲线分析[J]. 重庆医科大学学报, 2018, 43(9): 1257-1261.
[25] Suda, T., Hachimaru, A., Tochii, D., et al. (2016) Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Thymectomy versus Subxiphoid Single-Port Thymectomy: Initial Results. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 49, i54-i58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[26] Li, J., Qi, G., Liu, Y., et al. (2020) Meta-Analysis of Subxiphoid Ap-proach versus Lateral Approach for Thoracoscopic Thymectomy. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 15, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[27] Curley, G.F., Laffey, J.G., Zhang, H., et al. (2016) Biotrauma and Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury: Clinical Implications. Chest, 150, 1109-1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[28] 李仁鹏, 黎琰, 胡文滕, 等. 截石位经剑突下入路与侧卧位经肋间入路胸腔镜下前纵隔肿物切除术的临床分析[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2019, 26(12): 1171-1175.
[29] 胡迪. 双腔支气管导管插管与保留自主呼吸喉罩在胸腔镜肺大疱切除术患者全身麻醉中的应用效果[J]. 淮海医药, 2020, 38(3): 272-274.
[30] 秦智刚, 李锟. 单腔气管插管全身麻醉用于胸腔镜下肺大疱手术患者中的系统评价[J]. 当代医学, 2020, 26(18): 1-3.