情态副词“算是”的语义游移及变化机制
On Semantic Shit and Emergence Mechanism of “Suanshi”
DOI: 10.12677/ML.2023.111037, PDF,   
作者: 杨 净:上海师范大学,上海
关键词: 情态化命题主观叙实性Morality Proposition Subjective Narrative
摘要: 现代汉语“算是”经历情态化演变,“算是”的句法性质也发生了相应的变化。遵循形式和语义相适应原则,“算是”从“判断推测义”向“主观评价义”逐步推进。“算是”的情态化发展需要满足句法上否定形式从无到有,语义上事件叙实性从现实到非现实的变化。
Abstract: Modern Chinese “suanshi” has undergone modal evolution, and the syntactic nature of “suanshi” has also undergone corresponding changes. Following the principle of compatibility of form and semantics, “suanshi” gradually advances from “judgment and speculative meaning” to “subjective evaluation meaning”. The modal development of “suanshi” needs to meet the changes of syntactic negative form from growing out of nothing, semantic event narrative from reality to non-reality.
文章引用:杨净. 情态副词“算是”的语义游移及变化机制[J]. 现代语言学, 2023, 11(1): 253-258. https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2023.111037

参考文献

[1] 代玲玲. “就算是X”的真实、假设与违实[J]. 安庆师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 41(3): 123-128.
[2] 史金生. 语气副词的范围、类别和共现顺序[J]. 中国语文, 2003(1): 17-31.
[3] 罗素. 论模糊性[J]. 模糊系统与数学, 1990(1): 16-22.
[4] 李福印. 事件语法导论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2021.
[5] 沈家煊. “语法化”研究综观[J]. 外语教学与研究, 1994(4): 17-24, 80.
[6] 袁毓林. 叙实性和事实性: 语言推理的两种导航机制[J]. 语文研究, 2020(1): 1-9.
[7] 宗守云. 积极反叙实动词与消极反叙实动词——以“当”为例[J]. 世界汉语教学, 2021, 35(3): 323-334.