症状性颅内椎–基底动脉非急性闭塞介入开通的疗效观察
Curative Effect Observation of Interventional Patency of Symptomatic Vertebrobasilar Artery Non-Acute Occlusion
DOI: 10.12677/ACM.2023.131138, PDF,   
作者: 金文涛:青岛大学,山东 青岛;枣庄市山亭区人民医院,山东 枣庄;孙玉杰, 张 勇*:青岛大学附属医院,山东 青岛;杨芬芬:滕州市中心人民医院,山东 枣庄
关键词: 椎–基底动脉颅内段非急性闭塞血管内治疗球囊扩张术支架置入术Vertebrobasilar Artery Intracranial Segment Non-Acute Occlusion Endovascular Therapy Balloon Dilatation Stent Implantation
摘要: 目的:探讨症状性颅内椎–基底动脉非急性闭塞介入开通的技术可行性、围手术期安全性及治疗效果。方法:回顾性分析两家大型区域性卒中中心2017年8月至2021年8月收治的非急性颅内椎–基底动脉闭塞患者资料。分析这些患者的基本资料,临床特征、影像学特征及随访资料,包括开通成功率、围手术期并发症发生率、临床随访资料及影像随访资料。采用脑梗死溶栓试验(thrombolysis in cerebral ischemia, TICI)分级评估是否开通成功,采用改良Rankin量表(mRS)评估术后神经功能恢复程度。结果:本文纳入41例患者,成功开通37例,占比90.24%,术后TICI分级较术前TICI分级差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);4例出现围手术期并发症,无死亡病例,发生率为9.75%。对37例成功开通患者进行90天临床随访,无复发性TIA或中风;mRS评分与术前相比明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);1年临床随访时,有2例患者死亡(与手术无关)。35例患者mRS评分与术前相比差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:经过选择的有症状的非急性颅内椎–基底动脉闭塞患者,介入开通技术上可行,围手术期并发症可以接受,随访患者临床症状改善明显。
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the technical feasibility, perioperative safety and therapeutic effect of in-terventional opening of symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery non-acute occlusion. Methods: The data of patients with non-acute intracranial vertebrobasilar artery occlusion admit-ted from August 2017 to August 2021 in two large regional stroke centers were analyzed retro-spectively. The basic data, clinical characteristics, imaging characteristics and follow-up data of these patients were analyzed, including the success rate of patency, perioperative complication rate, clinical follow-up data and imaging follow-up data. The thrombolysis in cerebral ischemia (TICI) grade was used to assess whether the opening was successful, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to assess the degree of postoperative neurological recovery. Results: Of the 41 pa-tients included in this study, 37 patients were successfully opened, accounting for 90.24%. There was a significant difference in postoperative TICI grading compared with preoperative TICI grading (P < 0.05); There were 4 cases with perioperative complications, no death, and the incidence rate was 9.75%. 37 patients who were successfully opened were followed up for 90 days, and there was no recurrent TIA or stroke; The mRS score was significantly improved compared with that before operation (P < 0.05); During one year of clinical follow-up, 2 patients died (unrelated to surgery). The mRS scores of 35 patients were significantly different from those before operation (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The selected symptomatic patients with non-acute intracranial vertebrobasilar artery occlusion are technically feasible, the perioperative complications are acceptable, and the clinical symptoms of follow-up patients are improved significantly.
文章引用:金文涛, 孙玉杰, 杨芬芬, 刘彤晖, 张勇. 症状性颅内椎–基底动脉非急性闭塞介入开通的疗效观察[J]. 临床医学进展, 2023, 13(1): 970-977. https://doi.org/10.12677/ACM.2023.131138

参考文献

[1] Ma, N., et al. (2018) Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Arterial Stenosis in China: 1-Year Outcome of a Multicentre Registry Study. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 3, 176-184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[2] Lindsay, E. (2018) Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 54, 583-584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[3] Kong, W., et al. (2021) Outcomes of Endovascular Therapy in Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion with Severe Symptoms. JAMA Network Open, 4, e2139550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[4] Sarraj, A., Shazam Hussain, M. and Gupta, R. (2017) Response to Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Occlusion of the Middle Cerebral Artery M2 Seg-ment—Reply. JAMA Neurology, 74, 488-489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[5] Zhang, H., et al. (2021) Endovascular Recanalization and Standard Medical Management for Symptomatic Non-Acute Intracranial Artery Occlusion: Study Protocol for a Non-Randomized, 24-Month, Multicenter Study. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, Article ID: 729534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[6] Yamauchi, H., Higashi, T., et al. (2012) Is Misery Perfusion Still a Predictor of Stroke in Symptomatic Major Cerebral Artery Disease? Brain, 135, 2515-2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[7] Wang, Y., et al. (2014) Prevalence and Outcomes of Symptomatic Intra-cranial Large Artery Stenoses and Occlusions in China: The Chinese Intracranial Atherosclerosis (CICAS) Study. Stroke, 45, 663-669.
[8] Gao, P., et al. (2018) Endovascular Recanalization for Chronic Symptomatic Intracranial Vertebral Artery Total Occlusion: Experience of a Single Center and Review of Literature. Journal of Neuroradiology, 45, 295-304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[9] Samuels, O.B., Joseph, G.J., Lynn, M.J., Smith, H.A. and Chimowitz, M.I. (2000) A Standardized Method for Measuring Intracranial Arterial Stenosis. American Journal of Neu-roradiology, 21, 643-646.
[10] 赵芳, 周畅, 李广文, 孙玉杰, 刘彤辉. 非急性症状性颅内前循环大动脉闭塞血管内治疗的疗效观察[J]. 中风与神经疾病杂志, 2022, 39(1): 38-42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[11] The EC/IC Bypass Study Group (1985) Failure of Extra-cranial-Intracranial Arterial by Pass to Reduce the Risk of Ischemic Stroke—Results of an International Randomized Trial. New England Journal of Medicine, 313, 1191-1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[12] Komotar, R.J., et al. (2009) The Role of Indirect Extracrani-al-Intracranial Bypass in the Treatment of Symptomatic Intracranial Atheroocclusive Disease. Journal of Neurosurgery, 110, 896-904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[13] 陈康宁, 王伊龙. 2018症状性动脉粥样硬化性非急性颅内大动脉闭塞血管内治疗中国专家共识[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2018, 13(11): 1166-1181.
[14] Aghaebrahim, A., et al. (2014) Endovascular Recanalization of Complete Subacute to Chronic Atherosclerotic Occlusions of Intracranial Arteries. Jour-nal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 6, 645-648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[15] He, Y., et al. (2013) Preliminary Findings of Recanalization and Stenting for Symptomatic Vertebrobasilar Artery Occlusion Lasting More than 24 h: A Retrospective Analysis of 21 Cases. European Journal of Radiology, 82, 1481-1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[16] Chen, K., Hou, X., Zhou, Z., Li, G., Liu, Q., Gui, L., Hu, J. and Shi, S. (2017) The Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Recanalization of Occluded Large Cerebral Arteries during the Subacute Phase of Cerebral Infarction: A Case Series Report. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2, 124-131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[17] Wang, X., Wang, Z., Ji, Y., Ding, X., Zang, Y. and Wang, C. (2017) Enterprise Stent in Recanalizing Non-Acute Atherosclerotic Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Occlusion. Clinical Neu-rology and Neurosurgery, 162, 47-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[18] Nogueira, R.G., Jadhav, A.P., Haussen, D.C., Bonafe, A., Budzik, R.F., Bhuva, P., Yavagal, D.R., Ribo, M., Cognard, C., Hanel, R.A., Sila, C.A., Hassan, A.E., Millan, M., Levy, E.I., Mitchell, P., Chen, M., English, J.D., Shah, Q.A., Silver, F.L., Pereira, V.M., Mehta, B.P., Baxter, B.W., Abraham, M.G., Cardona, P., Veznedaroglu, E., Hellinger, F.R., Feng, L., Kirmani, J.F., Lopes, D.K., Jankowitz, B.T., Frankel, M.R., Costalat, V., Vora, N.A., Yoo, A.J., Malik, A.M., Furlan, A.J., Rubiera, M., Aghaebrahim, A., Olivot, J.M., Tekle, W.G., Shields, R., Graves, T., Lewis, R.J., Smith, W.S., Liebeskind, D.S., Saver, J.L. and Jovin, T.G. (2018) Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct. New England Journal of Medi-cine, 378, 11-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef
[19] Desai, S.M., et al. (2018) Thrombectomy 24 Hours after Stroke: Beyond DAWN. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, 10, 1039-1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
[20] 中华医学会神经病学分会神经血管介入协作组, 中国医师协会神经内科医师分会神经介入专业委员会, 中国研究型医院学会介入神经病学专业委员会. 中国颅内外大动脉非急性闭塞血管内介入治疗专家共识[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2020, 59(12): 932-941.