构建中国特色ESG评级体系的路径策略
The Path Strategy for Building an ESG Rating System with Chinese Characteristics
摘要: 气候变化、极端天气是人类面临的共同挑战,贫富差距、种族歧视、公平正义、冲突矛盾是人类面临的重大课题。在此背景下,中国积极参与ESG领域的全球经济治理意义重大。而参与ESG领域的全球经济治理的抓手之一是建立符合人类命运共同体的ESG评级体系来全面评判企业的发展绩效、长期发展能力和投资潜力,从而有效链接国内企业、投资机构、政府监管部门和专业智库平台形成合力,推动中国在全球范围的ESG投资行稳致远。本文旨在通过梳理国际国内ESG评级体系的差异,汲取国际主流ESG评级体系的经验,在联合国可持续发展目标的指导下,提出构建符合人类命运共同体的中国特色ESG评级体系的路径策略。
Abstract:
Climate change and extreme weather are common challenges facing humanity, and the gap between the rich and the poor, racial discrimination, justice and conflicts are the major issues facing humanity. In this context, China’s active participation in global economic governance in the ESG field is of great significance. One of the tools to participate in global economic governance in the ESG field is to establish an ESG rating system in line with the concept of a human community with a shared future to comprehensively judge the development performance, long-term development capability and investment potential of enterprises, so as to effectively link domestic enterprises, investment institutions, government regulators and professional think tank platforms to form a synergy to promote China’s ESG investment in the global context. The purpose of this paper is to sort out the differences between international and domestic ESG rating systems, learn from the experience of international mainstream ESG rating systems, and propose a pathway strategy for building an ESG rating system with Chinese characteristics that is consistent with the concept of a human community with a shared future under the guidance of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
参考文献
|
[1]
|
张晓燕. ESG投资的理念是将来的大势, 量化投资需要理性的预期和态度[EB/OL].
https://thuifr.pbcsf.tsinghua.edu.cn/info/1012/1743.htm, 2022-01-19.
|
|
[2]
|
清华大学中国经济思想与实践研究院(ACCEPT)宏观预测课题组, 徐翔, 吴舒钰, 李稻葵. 2021年中国宏观经济形势分析与预测——“十四五”开局之年: 加快完成疫后恢复是重中之重[J]. 改革, 2021(6): 1-16.
|
|
[3]
|
Rajesh, R. (2020) Exploring the Sustainability Per-formances of Firms Using Environmental, Social, and Governance Scores. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 965-987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[4]
|
Lee, D.D., Fan, J.H. and Wong, V.S.H. (2020) No More Ex-cuses! Performance of ESG-Integrated Portfolios in Australia. Accounting and Finance, 61, 2407-2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
|
|
[5]
|
徐振东. 巴塞尔协议持续改进引领全面风险管理变革[J]. 国际金融, 2019(5): 29-42.
|
|
[6]
|
郭栋, 熊蕙. “净零”驱动: 可持续债务创新演变、市场动态和策略应对[J]. 国际金融, 2021(9): 48-54.
|
|
[7]
|
中国证券投资基金业协会, 国务院发展研究中心金融研究所. 中国上市公司ESG评价体系研究报告(2019) [M]. 北京: 中国财政经济出版社, 2020.
|
|
[8]
|
曹德云. 中国保险资产管理业的ESG实践与发展[R]. 2020中国责任投资论坛, 2020.
|
|
[9]
|
Berg, F., Klbel, J.F. and Rigobon, R. (2019) Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings. Review of Finance, 26, 1315-1344.
|
|
[10]
|
Gibson, R., Krueger, P., Riand, N., et al. (2019) ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series, 77, 104-127.
|
|
[11]
|
郑秉文. 财富储备与“资产型”养老金体系转型研究[J]. 中国人口科学, 2021(1): 23-37+126.
|